Avaliações de usuários

Take a look at Princess Sweet Pea and watch her in the formal Tea Party where she meets Prince Henry and the impression one takes away is that not only is this a fantasy story, but the people producing it don't expect any other impression. It's cute. It parodies a little what goes on at a famous theme park we know where there is a store that you can take you little princess to buy a dress and visit the beauty salon to get all made up. If you have never been, yes, there is such a place and I could easily see this scene playing out there.

But then the story leaves the fantasy castle and theme park and goes out into the world leading eventually back to Henry's mother's kingdom.

We have a fanciful story that has what you need for a carefree fun time. Lacey is so good with Sophie that if it doesn't bring a tear, at least you want to go "Ahh".

But there is a bit of darkness in the kingdom as well. Many of these Royal romance stories have a Queen who always gives off a serious vibe and often some chastising as well. But if that's not enough there is also a royal advisor who is even more depressing. Obviously a potential villain, but he is almost as bad as "he who shall never be named".

If ever there was a commoner who didn't belong in the prince's world, it is Lacey who ironically has a job as a princess in a fantasy world.

As often happens where a child is as important to the story as this one, Lacey's screen time is split between Sophie and Henry making it harder to see chemistry between Nichole Sakura and William Moseley. The real chemistry is between Sakura and Francesca Europa as Rose.

I often complain in this genre about a character completely changing personality instantly. Emily Swan does that in spades as the queen.

In general terms the story is predictable. The obstacle to the romance is just like it is in so many Royal romance movies. The reconciliation is a little cute.

Because of some of the unusual, even quirky aspects of this story, there are some highlights. I mentioned the sentimental and the fanciful.

Third of a "Royal" Trilogy aired on Hallmark Channel in March 2025. Prince Henry, lead male character of this film, Prince Desmond of Androvia, lead male character in THE ROYAL WE, and Johnny Payne, heir to the Dukedom of Glasswick, England and lead male character in THE RELUCTANT ROYAL, are all cousins and referenced as such at the ends of both other films. The other two were breaths of fresh air. I already have a separate review posted for THE RELUCTANT ROYAL. THE ROYAL WE was nearly as engaging with the same great chemistry between actors, and the plot twists.

This one was just your run-of-the-mill formulaic and predictable "European Crown Prince falls for middle class American working girl" movie, specifically the variant where the prince is widowed with a young daughter who bonds with the American working girl who becomes a mentor to her. The characters have good chemistry and young Francesca Europa is particularly charming as the young princess, but it's just not something anyone who watches Hallmark Channel or Great American Family hasn't seen at least a half-dozen times before.

Oh, well, two out of three ain't bad!

The premise is pure Hallmark: Theme park princess meet handsome real life prince.

However, there are some very un-Hallmark issues here; the Princess is worried about aging out of her job and is frustrated by her unfinished educational goals, the prince's young daughter has emotional issues due to the death of her mother.

So, it's not perfect in this tale of fairy land meets real life fairy land.

The problem is how the Prince is portrayed. He talks in formal complete sentences and acts like his shorts are too small. A bad parody of what Americans think "Royals" are like.

Cardboard antagonists (the icy Queen and "Privy Council" head) are there to create roadblocks.

In private conversations the Prince acts and sounds entirely artificial. How about having him have two personas...one stuffy and "official" when acting in a official capacity and another where he talks and acts like a regular guy when talking to his daughter and the young woman trying to help her? The script DOES have him talk with the child and princess, but the actor uses the same tone all the time.

Do the Hallmark execs think a character with two facets (personas) is too subtle for audiences?

I hate to say it, but you have to blame the director here. A bit of subtle characterization would have done wonders here. I'm no Scorsese, but after watching a few takes I would if had the actor do the scene both ways...the traditional stilted Hallmark method, and one where the prince is acting less stereotypically "royal" when he needs to. When talking privately, make him a real person, not a stuffy stereotype.

Sakura does a wonderful job given her constraints, Moseley given his experience playing a modern prince in "The Royals" soap should have pushed his character to make him more realistic and relatable.

I hope to see more of Sakura, she comes across as much more real and worldly than the usual Hallmark lead female.

The basics were there to make it a much warmer, more dramatic and touching (but still HEA) film.

Hopefully Hallmark will let writers, directors and actors expand from their (admittedly successful) approach.

7.2 stars.

There are several interesting and somewhat charismatic characters in the story, which is why I give it the above average rating. It feels like a 6.9, but something about the atmosphere raised it a little.

Don't get me wrong, the story has been beaten-to-death and this movie does not stand out as anything particularly special. I enjoyed it sufficiently for a one-and-done, but the only chance of watching this ever again is if I run out of anything better, which I doubt will happen, considering I enjoyed hundreds, yes hundreds of Hallmark films more than this one.

But if you are planning on watching every royal-ish installment from Hallmark, this one is maybe a smidge above average. You might actually enjoy it, but I feel the plot and presentation are a bit deliberate and not original by any means. They modified the music a little to give it a slightly new feeling, not so much the usual royal horns and woodwinds, more strings and piano music, but that wasn't enough to make it stand out.

Never thought I would voluntarily sit through a hallmark movie but...boy did I enjoy it!!! The script? Whack. Costumes? Whack. Plot? Okay-ish. But holy snickerdoodles, William Mosely is not only a very good actor, able to make even some of the most absurd lines sound reasonable, he is also the finest British Beefcake I have had the pleasure of viewing upon in quite a while. Whenever he smiles and tiny crow's feet appear around the outer corners of his beautiful eyes I melt into a Mosely loving puddle. Also the way he interacted with his daughter and Lacey was so adorable and heart warming gosh. One thing I liked about this movie that didnt have anything to do with William and his wonderfullness was that it kinda felt like a children's movie? The relationship between Lacey and Henry is quite innocent, which was somewhat refreshing in the landscape of messed up romance movies we mostly see today. Anyways this movie just made me realise once again how much I'd love to see William Mosely return to Narnia in a movie about the Golden Era when the Pevensies are kings and queens.

I've been a little over all the royal type movies in the last 5 years, but I happened upon the premier of this movie tonight. Oh. My. Gosh. This was a lovely movie! Love the casting and overall storyline. I was a big fan of the actress who played Cheyenne in Superstore, so seeing her in this role was a complete 180 to that character. Pleasantly surprised she plays both so well. It also took a deep dive into IMDB to realize the prince is Peter from Chronicles of Narnia. Chemistry was fantastic and believable. While we all know basically how these movies end, this was still a really nice watch. Highly recommend!

Hallmark movies are where happily ever after lovers go for a guaranteed happy ending (usually in the last five minutes), and that's no different in one of their newest releases, Royal-ish. Theme park princess Lacey (Sakura) spends her days delivering magical tea parties to children in her role as Princess Sweet Pea. When she befriends 8-year-old Princess Rose (and her father and heir to the throne Prince Henry (Moseley) it sets off a romance that screams meet cute and swoon.

While the movie is very much stereotypical Hallmark in plot, it tackles some deeper issues. Lacey found work as a princess while she was working towards a graduate degree, and finds joy in bringing joy to others. She's worried about aging out of her job (which hadn't previously registered for me as an issue for theme park workers). The young princess Rose is struggling with the weight of responsibility after the death of her mother and a traumatic incident. And the romantic love interest (Prince Henry) struggles to balance his role as a father and the crown prince of a small kingdom. They did make some slight changes to the stereotypical 'royal' plot line for these movies that left me amused. And while the lines were undeniably cheesy, it remained entertaining and engaging.

Overall, this was another entertaining storyline. I didn't realize this was supposed to be another 'trilogy' movie, as they didn't connect it outright to the other movies (The Royal We and The Reluctant Royal) like they did in their other trilogies (The Wedding Veil Trilogy). I highly recommend this movie to those who like low pressure, guaranteed happily ever after stories. I don't recommend this movie to those looking for innovative, high-stakes storylines that are harder to predict.

Hallmark isn't good at producing "royal" themed movies, the plots and scripts are usually dumb and the dialog inane. That's the case with this movie, plus the female lead doesn't really work. William Moseley was in a far better movie "Christmas in Notting Hill" in 2023. The supporting cast were generally good.

The plot of this one is cliched, it's been done many times and most of the times they've bombed, like this movie. Hallmark really needs a new head of production who can find good scripts and good leads and make good rom-coms, their specialty. As always the filming locations in Canada are beautiful.

I don't hate Hallmark but... please stop making British Royal movies. Or at least watch how British is done by the BBC.... Watched the first few seconds of supposed Fencing, and it was painful to watch. Awkward, stumbling and inept, take them off grass and teach these 'actors' how to move/fight.

A good example of Fencing for film... check our Wednesday.

Please stop these American royal movies.

The costuming is cheap and crass, lacking any style and quality. If you must make these movies then stop shopping at Disney for cloths... The one star is really a no-star, for 'Royal-ish'

Error code saying review is too short ..... so this is added....