Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaIn a small town circa 1860 small pox takes the life of a little boy. He enters a world that will get him prepped and re-incarnated for his next life.In a small town circa 1860 small pox takes the life of a little boy. He enters a world that will get him prepped and re-incarnated for his next life.In a small town circa 1860 small pox takes the life of a little boy. He enters a world that will get him prepped and re-incarnated for his next life.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Josh Elliott Pickel
- Thomas
- (as Joshua Pickel)
Joseph Ciminera
- Orz, Lead Guardian
- (as Joe Ciminera)
Tiffany Browne-Tavarez
- Mrs. Peters
- (as Tiffany Brown-Tavarez)
James Terriaca
- The Relic
- (as Jim Terriaca)
Nicole Rosenberg
- The Witch
- (as Nicole Rosengberg)
Adam Ginsberg
- Dark Lord
- (as Adam Ginsberg III)
Avaliações em destaque
Wow, what can I say? The acting was not only terrible, but the actors kept forgetting their lines, or stumbling through them making corrections as they went along. I was dumb struck with the lack of period costumes/clothes. It was set in 1860's but you had all kinds of dresses, except the actual hoop skirt dresses of the time. (I seen only one) I seen hair styles, short sleek, modern cuts, other than a few kids with braids or an adult with waist long hair, none of them had the braid, ringlets, and buns worn in the 1800,s. They wore hats from the 1700's, as well as modern style hats. Not the style of bonnets or hair attire worn in the 1800's. I especially loved the sleeping caps worn in church and during the day in public with their short hair sticking out of it. When I seen a guy walking with knicker style pants like worn in the 1600's I burst out laughing. You may be working on a short budget, but come on. Actors need to remember their lines and not say ummmm so much. I just could not get past the mixed period clothes everyone wore. I guess you just needed a long dress to play a part. If it was a modern straight maxi dress from the local clothing store it was OK. I can get past a little period inconsistencies, but this was a constant. I hung on for the first 1/2 hour hoping for any type of improvement in the movie before finally turning it off in disgust.
Waste of money and my time.
Waste of money and my time.
Quite possibly the worst community theater "actors" on the planet got together with a seriously deluded writer/director and made this piece of flotsam.....ghastly....hilariously bad acting......incomprehensible plot and script.......uncomfortably inferior writing and delivery of badly written dialogue......apparently, anybody that contributed money to this project was cast in a speaking role....so many characters that it was impossible for continuity......the only good work was the actual camera operation and special effects.....all wasted by community theatre-quality direction......somebody in that cast had big money, because Red Box got paid to put it in their machines....I turned it off after 15 minutes of gawping in wonder....
I thought oh man it's a new horror movie on red box and it looks creepy. Well goes to show that looks are deceiving. Extremely horrible movie. The actors are downright awful as well as the story line. Which I never found out what it even was. Everyone who played part in the movie has got to be deeply ashamed. I maybe watched 15 minutes and honestly thought it was a joke. I wish I would of looked on here first and have saw the obvious awful rating. Folding laundry and brushing my teeth was more entertaining than this barf. Worst movie I have saw in years. So please don't waste your dollar at red box because it's not even worth a dollar. I wouldn't even accept if it was given to me.
FIrst off, all the positive reviews on here are clearly written by the director or someone involved in the film - they share the same weird overuse of commas and odd grammatical structure. But more importantly, no sentient being could sit through ten minutes of this without recognizing the utter and complete lack of even the tiniest shred of filmmaking going on here. This is literally one of the most pathetic excuses for a "film" I've ever seen. It is no exaggeration to say that I've seen high school film projects done in two weeks that had more intelligence and artistic talent than this gigantic turd. The "director" should be ashamed, and if it's him leaving these bogus 9-star reviews, I can guarantee him that it's not going to help - no one will watch this and walk away unscarred by its sheer, undiluted crapitude. Please, do yourself a favor, bang your head against a wall for an hour - it's much more entertaining than "6 Minutes of Death."
6 minutes of death shouldn't be this good. But it is. How can the director turn a movie that cost 5k into a feature with a wide release? He has and did before. In fact, I found it rather great. 6 minutes of death a lot of descriptions were bandied about. Many said it was very so so, I'd say the film is a Hitchcockian execution with a story that feels started from the brain of a deep horror fan director. But I don't want all of that to say 6 minutes of death is the best horror film I have ever seen. It is very much its own thing and credit for the film rests heavily on on the no script style of director Joe Ciminera who normally gets your palms wet and cold. Combine that with a dedicated performance by a few known B actors and you've got a masterful display of suspense that in my opinion is a worth watch, Enjoy the film
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- 6 Minutes of Death
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 5.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 10 min(70 min)
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente