Um mockumentário de crimes reais sobre a perseguição por dois detetives de um assassino em série chamado Mr. Shiny, que aterrorizou o sul da Califórnia por quase duas décadas.Um mockumentário de crimes reais sobre a perseguição por dois detetives de um assassino em série chamado Mr. Shiny, que aterrorizou o sul da Califórnia por quase duas décadas.Um mockumentário de crimes reais sobre a perseguição por dois detetives de um assassino em série chamado Mr. Shiny, que aterrorizou o sul da Califórnia por quase duas décadas.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 2 vitórias e 1 indicação no total
Avaliações em destaque
Strange Harvest is a fascinating hybrid on paper a horror mockumentary that merges the unsettling realism of true crime with the creeping dread of a slasher film. Directed by Stuart Ortiz (Grave Encounters), the film chronicles the return of a long-dormant serial killer known as "Mr. Shiny," who resurfaces in Southern California's Inland Empire after a 20-year absence. Told through interviews with detectives, witnesses, and survivors, the story unfolds much like a Netflix docuseries or an Investigation Discovery special, but with the menace of a fictional monster lurking between the lines.
If you're a fan of the ID Channel or Netflix crime documentaries especially those built on talking head interviews, crime scene photos, and slow burn narrative reveals this movie is squarely in your wheelhouse. Ortiz nails the structure of a prestige docuseries, right down to the ominous voiceovers, grainy police footage, and staged reenactments that look just believable enough to make you forget you're watching a scripted film. The two lead detectives, played with grit and weary realism, give the story a grounded center, and the Inland Empire setting brings a sun-bleached, suburban eeriness to the proceedings.
That said, while the format is well executed, it's also limiting. There's a compelling protagonist here, and Mr. Shiny himself is an intriguing, cryptic villain-but the rigid docu-style storytelling keeps them both at arm's length. We're always watching them through someone else's filter, rather than fully inhabiting their world. The horror elements, when they arrive, are effective but sparse, sometimes feeling like they're spliced in rather than organically growing from the story.
This is where Strange Harvest may divide audiences. For true crime devotees, the authenticity and attention to procedural detail will be a treat. For horror fans looking for immersive tension or sustained scares, the docu-style pacing might feel like a slow drip that never fully erupts. And for viewers like me, who see the potential in the premise but want more than just a convincing imitation of a streaming documentary, it's hard not to wish the film broke free of its own structure.
Ultimately, Strange Harvest is a well crafted experiment that succeeds at what it's trying to do-recreate the feeling of a prestige true-crime do, but in doing so, it may have boxed itself in. It's a film that feels almost too convincing for its own good, leaving you wondering if the same story might have worked better told without the mockumentary constraints.
If you're a fan of the ID Channel or Netflix crime documentaries especially those built on talking head interviews, crime scene photos, and slow burn narrative reveals this movie is squarely in your wheelhouse. Ortiz nails the structure of a prestige docuseries, right down to the ominous voiceovers, grainy police footage, and staged reenactments that look just believable enough to make you forget you're watching a scripted film. The two lead detectives, played with grit and weary realism, give the story a grounded center, and the Inland Empire setting brings a sun-bleached, suburban eeriness to the proceedings.
That said, while the format is well executed, it's also limiting. There's a compelling protagonist here, and Mr. Shiny himself is an intriguing, cryptic villain-but the rigid docu-style storytelling keeps them both at arm's length. We're always watching them through someone else's filter, rather than fully inhabiting their world. The horror elements, when they arrive, are effective but sparse, sometimes feeling like they're spliced in rather than organically growing from the story.
This is where Strange Harvest may divide audiences. For true crime devotees, the authenticity and attention to procedural detail will be a treat. For horror fans looking for immersive tension or sustained scares, the docu-style pacing might feel like a slow drip that never fully erupts. And for viewers like me, who see the potential in the premise but want more than just a convincing imitation of a streaming documentary, it's hard not to wish the film broke free of its own structure.
Ultimately, Strange Harvest is a well crafted experiment that succeeds at what it's trying to do-recreate the feeling of a prestige true-crime do, but in doing so, it may have boxed itself in. It's a film that feels almost too convincing for its own good, leaving you wondering if the same story might have worked better told without the mockumentary constraints.
Strange Harvest had so much promise, blending its true crime element seamlessly into an eerie, gripping story. For most of the runtime, I was hooked with the pacing, atmosphere, and slow-burn tension were top notch. Unfortunately, the ending completely fizzled. There's barely any satisfying conclusion, and not even a clever final twist to leave on a high note. It's such a shame, because the rest was so strong. A 6/10 for me. Worth watching, but the final moments left me more frustrated than thrilled.
Saw this at Nevermore Film Festival in Durham, NC. This film nails the true-crime documentary format, with two hard-boiled detectives relating the story of how they worked to track down a serial killer in San Bernardino County, CA. It's like an extended edition of Dateline crossed with horror, and that's a grand compliment.
There are a lot of killings for the detectives to describe, but leads Peter Zizzo (Det. Joe Kirby) and Terri Apple (Det. Alexis 'Lexi' Taylor) keep it intensely interesting. Their sincere performance helps ground the film, which has a lot of pretty horrifying details to relate.
Although their testimony are mostly filmed seated (separately) in a studio, there are plenty of on-site details of the murders, and insightful and realistic interviews with the people who knew the victims.
The identity of the killer, who calls himself Mr. Shiny, and his reason for his killing spree is kept partially unknown to us until late in the film, which helps slowly ratchet up the suspense from beginning to end.
The film is quite gory, as it doesn't shy away from showing us the aftermath of the murders, each grisly in its own warped way.
When you realize the real reason for the murders (which you might guess sooner than I), the film takes on another dimension of fright.
To finish, if you like police procedurals, but find them too tame, this fictional account is a remarkable likeness of the format, as long as you're ready for some disturbing images.
There are a lot of killings for the detectives to describe, but leads Peter Zizzo (Det. Joe Kirby) and Terri Apple (Det. Alexis 'Lexi' Taylor) keep it intensely interesting. Their sincere performance helps ground the film, which has a lot of pretty horrifying details to relate.
Although their testimony are mostly filmed seated (separately) in a studio, there are plenty of on-site details of the murders, and insightful and realistic interviews with the people who knew the victims.
The identity of the killer, who calls himself Mr. Shiny, and his reason for his killing spree is kept partially unknown to us until late in the film, which helps slowly ratchet up the suspense from beginning to end.
The film is quite gory, as it doesn't shy away from showing us the aftermath of the murders, each grisly in its own warped way.
When you realize the real reason for the murders (which you might guess sooner than I), the film takes on another dimension of fright.
To finish, if you like police procedurals, but find them too tame, this fictional account is a remarkable likeness of the format, as long as you're ready for some disturbing images.
I'm a huge fan of found-footage, mockumentary style filmmaking. I really love and appreciate the illusion of truth convincingly told through interviews, first-hand accounts, character exploration etc., and this new independent horror film "Strange Harvest" checks off the boxes I needed to go see it in theatres. It's also the same writer/director who gave us "Grave Encounters", a personal favorite of mine.
Stuart Ortiz's new project centers around a ghostly serial killer with a cosmic agenda and a ritualistic manner of executing his victims. Much like the infamous Zodiac killer he enjoys taunting and mocking law enforcement with cryptic letters while meticulously tracking his victims to make sure they fit his demented criteria. We are told all of this through a series of ongoing interviews with San Bernardino County detectives and investigators as well as friends and loved ones of some of the victims. Overall I felt the acting was really solid and clean, if I wasn't already used to this style of filmmaking I would have genuinely believed these were true accounts that simply went under my radar. I would have assumed there's been a sadistic and disturbed man rampaging through the inland empire.
I've never seen this style of filmmaking on the big screen before, but I'm very glad I did and I do highly recommend this to anyone who loves and wants to support independent horror projects or anyone interested in the world of true crime mystery and lore. (8/10)
Stuart Ortiz's new project centers around a ghostly serial killer with a cosmic agenda and a ritualistic manner of executing his victims. Much like the infamous Zodiac killer he enjoys taunting and mocking law enforcement with cryptic letters while meticulously tracking his victims to make sure they fit his demented criteria. We are told all of this through a series of ongoing interviews with San Bernardino County detectives and investigators as well as friends and loved ones of some of the victims. Overall I felt the acting was really solid and clean, if I wasn't already used to this style of filmmaking I would have genuinely believed these were true accounts that simply went under my radar. I would have assumed there's been a sadistic and disturbed man rampaging through the inland empire.
I've never seen this style of filmmaking on the big screen before, but I'm very glad I did and I do highly recommend this to anyone who loves and wants to support independent horror projects or anyone interested in the world of true crime mystery and lore. (8/10)
The vibes of Fincher's Zodiac combined with Lovecraftian cosmic horror, expertly presented in a found footage/true crime documentary format. It's unsettling, interesting, and compelling, with some great practical effects and an intriguing antagonist. I absolutely love found footage horror, I think it's a sub-genre that, when put in the right hands, can lead to some truly creative filmmaking. This is now a new favorite of mine, and has the potential to become a classic of the genre.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoDuring one of the scenes mimicking a local TV broadcast, the temperature appears as 74°C, which would be about 165°F.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThere's a bonus scene after the credits.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 385.028
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 223.208
- 10 de ago. de 2025
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 385.028
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 34 min(94 min)
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente