Mahi va gorbeh

A truly exceptional and extraordinary film that was both compelling and technically brilliant. Much like Alexander Sokurov's 2002 film Russian Ark, this film is shot in one single, continuous take that lasts, in this case, over two hours in length. That's enough to make it a technical marvel, but better is that Shahram Mokri manages to make a tantalising tale in the process.

The film starts by relating the urban legend of restaurants in the north of Iran which were shut down due to serving human flesh. Then the single shot begins and we follow two men from a suitably ominous restaurant attempting to coax some lost travellers to dine there. It's a fairly obvious beginning, and the insidious tension is high from the start.

However from there, the tale (and the shot) meanders much more than we might expect. We branch off to follow different characters for a while, then we catch up with old ones. Then, we start to see scenes which are oddly familiar—we end up in cycles, in loops of time that all seem to flow so naturally from one to the other. And there's always that underlying sinister element— we know something bad is going to happen from that first moment of the film, but we don't quite know when.

This is all the hook it needed for me to keep me captivated through this tale. And I was captivated throughout—this was riveting stuff, even as we watch the most mundane conversations between two characters, and then repeat them again from a slightly different angle some time later.

In the discussion after the showing of the film, the director stated fairly unequivocally that he wasn't influenced by any Iranian directors in particular, but as far as I'm concerned there are huge similarities to two of Jafar Panahi's films—the meandering storytelling of Dayereh, which also follows a sequence of different characters, and Closed Curtain (an excellent film I saw at the festival in 2013), which has that same sense of understated mystery and foreboding.

This really was an excellent film—it was ground-breaking and avant-garde in all the best ways possible, and used its uniqueness as a brilliant hook to enhance its appeal.

well this movie was a complete waste of time. i don't know why it had been given so many prizes intentionally? It's boring as hell and it's not even like a horror movie.there were so much buzz about this movie that i was excited to watch it but i was bored 10 minutes in. It seems the director wanted to make a horror movie but failed to do so.it's a big problem in Iranian cinema. the directors just don't know how to make a good horror movie like Hollywood does.just following the people with a camera and blurting out nonsense dialogues won't make a movie good enough to watch.this movie didn't even followed a certain rule.it was like you are following a bunch of clueless people going around. Don't waste your time. go and watch something else.

Fish and Cat was recently screened in Iran as part of what is called the "Art and Experience" movement, wherein independent films receive limited screening and all box- office revenue is given to the director and producers in support of such films.

I had personally followed news on Fish and Cat ever since its recognition at the Venice film festival. The movie is advertised as a slasher, and I guess that's what gets audiences all excited about the film in the first place: a number of guys running a restaurant in the north of Iran allegedly serve human meat to their customers (not the most usual theme for an Iranian film) but the movie is far more complex and layered than this simple hook would suggest.

Apart from the seemingly-impossible feat of recording a 2-hour-long movie in one take (I can only imagine how the crew felt after someone made a mistake -- and I assume there must have been at least a few), the cyclical nature of time, the recurrence of events, the eerie voice overs, the sudden shifts in tone and the elements of horror planted here and there made Fish and Cat into a cinematic treat.

Director Shahram Mokri obviously does not expect his audience to make sense of it all. Rather, he wants you to get lost in the borderlands of dream and reality, and he achieves this quite brilliantly. In fact, during the first few loops in time, I found myself trying to figure out what had just happened and at which point in the overall storyline the iterations were taking place; but after the loops occurred increasingly more often half-way through the film, I simply gave up and just waited to see where the film would take me next.

The movie can be viewed as a series of short films wrung together through the story of the restaurant and its ominous cooks, and in spite of the dissimilar themes (coincidence, loss, love, etc.), the overall product is a surprisingly coherent narrative and a successful feature-length film.

This is an attempt to create a clumsy copy that the director couldn't made, anything used in this movie such as storyline, scripts, directing, filming, and other stuff are very clumsy, primitive and used in the wrong place and without a purpose, so if you want to waste your more than a 2 hours of your time I highly recommend you to watch it.

Upon learning the story behind this particular movie, I was filled with excitement and anticipation. Unfortunately, my eagerness was short-lived after watching the movie. The storyline was completely irrelevant, with the text being random and unrelated. The plot of the movie had no clear direction and felt disjointed, with the different parts of the movie lacking any coherence. The performances by the actors felt artificial, with little to no emotion or connection between them. Overall, the movie was a huge letdown, and I highly advise against watching it if you are looking for a good storyline and well-executed performances.