Supreme Justice with Judge Karen

This show makes me sick. Almost every decision she makes is SO WRONG. I'm not sure how the contestants are compensated but if the show pays the money sued for no wonder she hardly ever rules for the plaintive or dismisses both sides. She acts like she's stupid, interrupts to much, doesn't use common sense and asks for impossible "proof" when common sense should prevail. Don't ever go to her if you want justice! Awful, awful awful. If you loan someone money and it's obvious it's a loan she won't rule for you because she calls you stupid for the loan. I just can't watch it anymore and will not watch the advertisements or trust them because of how bad she is.

I have been watching Judge Karen for a few months now and find that many of her rulings are not only unjust, but defy logic and integrity. She yells, ridicules and gives people bad advice. In the show today Judge Karen told a young man to disassociate with his mother and called him a Momma's Boy. Where is the honor and respect for a parent, whether you agree with what she did or not? For her to tell the son not to bother with his mother and to embarrass her in court that way was inexcusable. Because a son loves his mother or listens to her wise advice does not make him a Momma's Boy. You could see he agreed with his mother, yet Judge Karen still made fun of him and called them both names. How mean to try and separate a mother and son. It is not her role as a judge to ruin people's lives. She should not be a judge nor be on TV. This is the last show I'll be watching.

I've never understood the "my courtroom" attitude, condescension and disdain some/most of these tv judges exhibit...as though their job is a favor to the litigant. I don't generally take issue with her rulings; I DO find her to be rude, dramatic, condescending, patronizing.. I can go on. The courtroom is dramatic itself without the extras...maybe it's necessary for ratings, but Mathis is even MORE dramatic, entertaining and loads more respectful doing it. You leave with your dignity in tact .. unless you try to play him. Then you leave in pieces. Sis can learn from a brotha. I think she's the one who says purpose of court is to make you whole or restore you to wholeness or some such. You don't do that awarding damages but damaging individuals in the process.

Similar to many other shows of this type, the show is entirely scripted, using outrageous complaints, and people who simply cannot act. It's an embarrassment for anyone involved in its production. With excellent legal-based fare on TV, it's incredible that this nonsense has found any audience. In the episode that I'm watching currently, a guy claimed that his ankle was broken by another fraternity member, and he wanted less than $150 in damages. The first case involved a woman who claimed that her husband-to-be faked his death, and had no proof that an money was expended, or that any sort of promise had been made. As I mentioned earlier, absolute nonsense. The show is produced by "Entertainment Studios", an obvious clue that no one involved with this mess has any legal standing whatsoever.

I am so upset over Judge Karen's decision today. She chose to teach the

plaintiff a lesson because she loaned the defendant $4000 after only 3

dates to purchase a car and he was to repay on payday.....Judge said

the plaintiff needed to learn a lesson..... first off this was a "verbal" contract and the defendant paid her $1000 (which proves he knew it

wasn't a gift)..... I understand why the judge wanted her to "learn"

not to loan a boyfriend money but what lesson did it teach him? Judge

should've just went by the evidence not her place to "teach" a

lesson......