Martin Scorsese Presents: The Saints

Martin Scorsese's idea behind The Saints is laudable. A series that looks into the lives of Christians who did extraordinary things in the name of God. We don't hear about them unless you go to the School of Theology. So putting some of these on the big screen was something I was excited about.

After watching the first 4 episodes however, I must say I am beyond disappointed. For a world class director like Martin Scorsese. The director who gave us classics like Goodfellas, The Wolf of Wall Street, Shuttle Island, Uncut Gem and Killers of the Flower Moon, I truly expected something outstanding. What we got however was more of a mini-documentary with narrations and a short discussion at the end with Martin's friends. Something I have my reservations about, but won't get into it.

The stories also were very bland. I don't know if it's due to lack of content, and not wanting to fabricate anything but then I watched the one with John the Baptist and there were several scenes not found in the Bible and what was found in the Bible was nicely omitted so I guess it wasn't about lack of content. With that being said, I think the first episode was the best so far. The rest, quite forgettable.

I guess not everyone can do it like Mel Gibson.

Not talking about the lead actress here... who is doing a fine job.

But the embarrassingly fake & forced "french accent" used by some of the actors, and in the ADR/dubbing, of the first episode ("Joan Of Arc") is absolutely terrible.

Everyone is now talking about (and aware of) cultural representation, but obviously FOXnation still seems to think that Pepe Le Pew is a truthful portrayal of the French heritage.

It is, however, the 21st century, therefore whoever directed the ADR/Dubbing, and/or let some actors do a parodic-sounding accent, should really get educated on proper cultural representation , or just let non-french actors speak in their real voice to avoid this absolute trainwreck. The work done here is neither truthful nor subtle (to say the very least!).

Other than that, the episode is actually pretty well filmed and edited. Scorsese is, of course, always enjoyable as a narrator, and the episode is well researched.

Unfortunately, the viewing is ruined by (and losing credibility from) the silly over-exaggerated phony "french" accent work (oscillating from comical to just degrading) and the subpar overdubbing which sounds like it was made in someone's living room by some random youtubers. For a show that is supposed to be high-quality television aiming at being both historically and culturally authentic, the team in charge of Voice direction should have tried harder than going for cheap & goofy stereotyping, because there is no other way to call this.... and when a show like "Emily In Paris" sounds less stereotypic than your historical documentary... it tells a lot on the quality and care that was put in your work.

Please, for the love of humanity, do better.

It saddens me to make this post. I think it is important to separate the craft of the making of these episodes from the religious material. In regards to the making I can only say that although the scenes were well designed etc that the fake accents and the shallow script made it so unpalatable that it detracted from the main theme. The format was also a bit overbearing with the discussions at the end of each episode. These people were so far removed from modern life that one has to wonder what went on in Scorsese's mind. I felt so totally wanting to slap these people out of their weird sense of reality. They were in their historical and old world bubble and just never left the ideas of the pre industrial and scientific age. Just boring and so slily. Bow for the religious aspect and I will likely get a few hates for this. The entire Christianity thing is such a total fake. Exactly like most other religions especially that of Islam and their idiotic Koran and Mohamed guy. Desert rat trying to get a following and yes he did which says a lot about Muslims. Look people, get out of the fairyland bulsh1t that has been plaguing the world for centuries, try for once to have a close look at the real universe and stop with the personification garbage of god and all this DOGMA OF HOW WE SHOULD BEHAVE AND PROTECT OUR IMMORTAL SOUL. REALLY DUMB STUFF. THE FACT THAT NO OTHER ANIMAL ON THE PLANET HAS A NEED FOR GOD SHOULD TELL YOU THAT THE ONLY REASON WHY THE HUMAN SPECIES WITH ITS TINY LITTLE BRAIN HAS A NEED FOR ONE IS VERY WEIRD. SOME PROGRAMMING GONE WRONG HERE PEOPLE. TO SUM IT UP = GOD IS EVERYWHERE AND IN EVERYTHING OR IT IS NOT SO AND IN EITHER CASE NOTHING REALLY CHANGES THE FACT THAT WE EXIST, WE DIE AND THAT IS IT. GET USED TO IT.

First, not withstanding his talents, Scorsese sadly seems intent on making The Saints about himself in title and his presence throughout. This during a time when the vast center and outspoken of his industry is clearly anti-Christianity.

Second, the screens seem poorly fabricated and labor-some throughout and more fitting to a 'B' grade movie even though the actress portraying Joan seemed quite good - not withstanding the fake french accents.

Third, I found the mostly pretentious panel discussion tedious and primarily useless other than the light explanation and timeline refererence of how Sainthood is determined by the Catholic Church today.

Note comments like "not even a person of letters" adds nothing but does show the bias of fools playing to the camera with nothing of value to add other than their token popularity restricted to their worldly pursuits. And, madam, giggling is never acceptable for any serious discussion.

Somehow these "experts?" provided nothing but seemed there only as attempt to gander credibility by their presence - which failed to my view.

Fourth, I must confess that I only watched the Joan of Arc episode as I judged the effort on this first episode as indicating the rest would not be worth my time or the fee to FOX. Plus there are much, much better source materials that can be studied which far surpass this attempt by(?) Scorsese.

Fifth, by stripping out the "panel" these episodes might be suitable for teens in a classroom setting to be shown prior to a discussion in general and on specific issues led by an informed teacher.

I started to watch the first episode, not knowing quite what to expect from a Scorsese produced show about the saints, but I was pleasantly surprised.

The series uses Scorsese's narration and dramatisations of key events in the saint's life to tell the viewer the background story of what they did and why they became saints.

The first saint, not surprisingly, is Joan of Arc. Now I, like many, I suspect, know the basics of Joan's story but little else about her. The show does a good job of filling in the background about their lives and what marked them out for sainthood.

I think it's worth watching, based on this first episode.