Campo dos Mortos

Wannabe actors and director meets Evil Dead. First, get an original idea for a movie. Too many films are being made with no thought involved in the plot, acting or anything else. The whole film was nowhere close to being exciting or interesting for that matter. The killings, possessions and so forth has been done so many times, the fright is not there.

There is nothing new in this film except a black mark against the people who made this atrocious piece of work. I think people are running out of ideas; remakes of old films are being produced, movies based on comics and these pathetic found footage are still being released.

People, forget American movies for now and look up some foreign horror which you may surprisingly find more entertaining.

This had to be written by a middle schooler. The acting was terrible. Ashley (the "hottie") was the worst actress. Her spoiled routine was cliche and poorly executed. Skip this dumb movie.

Fields of the Dead (2014) is currently available on Tubi. The storyline follows a group of friends who stay the night in an old farm house. One of the friends find an old book in their room and decide to read a couple passages which awakes the dead around the farm. Can the friends survive the night?

This movie is directed by Daniel B. Iske (Monster X) and stars Mark Booker (Perfectmatch), Melanie Recker (It's Dark Here), Lara Adkins (The Wretched) and Mike Delange (The Wretched).

There's absolutely nothing good about this film. The kill to start the movie before the opening credits was weak and could have been much better. The jump scares in this were also lacking and the film focuses too much on character interactions and "missing friends" rather the horror elements. The use of blood was also a miss and the comedy elements were lame. There's really no aspects of this I liked.

Overall this is a disappointing addition to the horror genre I'd recommend skipping. I'd score this a 1/10.

Well you know a movie is going to be pretty bad when they rely on s*x and nudity more than is neccassary. Yes i understand it is low budget but i have seen many more low budget films do way better. The "actors" were terrible and should try to find other work. Sound was actually pretty good where music was not super loud compared to talking. Scenery was very nice. I am not sure why reviews have to be so many characters now. With some movies, especially one like this, you can only have so much to say. Very pedastrian (hope i spelled it right). Colour was good. Camera was good. Sound was good. Acting was not good.

I watched this movie yesterday, thinking it was a new part of the Land / Diary / Survival Of The Dead that I somehow missed... Yes, that's right... Anyway, after the first 2 minutes I knew it was NOT what I thought it will be. But I kept watching - sadly.

I wouldn't say that I regret watching it. I think it somehow will lower my expectation for a few next horror films. Therefore it still has a positive aspect, but that's really the only one.

I think the simplest way to explain is this: There's sunny weather and the next day it's cloudy, you'll say: Man, the weather sucks tomorrow." But if it's rainy and the next day it's cloudy, you'll say: "Aaah nice, at least no more rain!!" The movie would represent a blizzard in that scenario.

---- Due to the fact that you can't even make fun of it, I rate that movie lower than other really bad movies like sand sharks, sharknado, bigfoot,.. at least they had it's funny moments...