The story involves characters I don't care about as they are so vacuous. They are people who utter polysyllabic technical words used by people who critique literature technically, thinking that makes them intellectual. Worst they think there's absolute value in other people's opinions about story's.
Apart from this pretense at being "clever" when the characters come across to me as vacuous People with the mental age of children, the characters and story board are clunky as hell.
Most of the film it appears is shot on the same park bench (cheap I know - I get it they are showing "they can" but actually can't! ) Presumably they had waivers to be able to film in a park somewhere / why not pick some alternate locations ? After 1 hour they finally get off the bench for the clunkiest tracking sHot ever. The composition is awful (both characters bang in the centre of the screen) rule of thirds ?!?! Hello ?!?!
9 minutes to the end there's another location - lying on the grass . I felt like cheering. The most interesting thing that had happened in the last hour.
Ok I'm harsh here on the photography. It isn't too bad - it's in focus mainly - the exposure is usually ok (sometimes underexposed) - err ok I know I'm being too techy there. The editing . Nooooo - at the end of each scene there's a terrible slow fade to black - then fade back to the same scene - but it's ok they have different clothes so you can tell it's a new scene -- err actually you can tell it's a disguised jump cut -- come on !!!! It's just not necessary!
The actors do pretty well, they depict vacuous characters reasonably well - but are wrestling with a terrible script, and poor direction.
Deep thoughts/ themes? I've no idea - I simply couldn't keep interested enough to think at that level about the film.
I had to start this review with 20 minutes to go: as essentially it had got to the point of losing me as an invested audience member.
"I'm going to get married tomorrow at 2 and I'm going to be happy" I've just heard the heroin say. Oh groan.
There are lots of conceptually stunning films Well executed about interactions between pupils and teachers - this is not one of them - try - good will hunting educating Rita, the history boys etc etc. This does not figure in that list.
Films about love - again this one is cringe worthy.
The story board is also poor.
When there is a montage - the montage depicts Exactly what is being said. The person who wrote the story board obviously doesn't understand that with film - you either depict things in the dialogue or visually - you do not have to say "we got on a bus" as you show them "getting on a bus" just show them getting on a flipping bus!!
I gather it is described as a romantic comedy.
I can buy the romantic bit - the two characters do finally get together, but comedy ?!?! There's no way I'd have known had I not read that. There seriously is no comedy in this. The odd (and I mean odd) mildly amusing retort from one character to the other (2 or 3
Maybe in the film?) as you'd have in any normal conversation between two people.
The good bit about the film ? It's pretty short as films go, at not much over an hour. Excellent. Pacing would have been better if they'd edited it down to bantam weight 20 minute art student overly long production though, needing some further editing.
Unfortunately I can't give it lower than 1 out of ten which is unreasonably high.
It appears Turkeys are not just for Christmas.
