Hits

Maybe the movie would have been better if David Cross was actually in it, instead being behind the scenes as writer director.

The Mr. Show star turns what feels like a few sketches into one big movie about a girl trying to be a star in this era of Reality TV shows like Teen mom which the protagonist is obsessed with and social media, while her dad is getting the attention she thinks she deserves when his complaints about a pot hole in his street goes viral and all the hipsters from Brooklyn come out to help him.

The movie was not funny, although I'm in complete agreement with the joke, it did not make me laugh one bit sorry to say.

It was cool that David Cross got all his friends like Micheal Cera to take small roles adding to the feel of it being a bunch of sketches.

Overall, I got no real satisfaction on his parody of today's version of fame

Ahhh, Hits. It's one of those movies that you want to like going in more than you actually like after seeing it.

I think the main problem with this movie is that it suffers tremendously from "my first film" disease. Cross wrote and directed it, and because of that doesn't seem to be willing or able to throw anything away.

For example, Michael Cera plays a drug dealer and has two scenes. In those scenes we find that another character really likes a particular type of weed. That character's liking that particular type of weed is never referenced thereafter. (Nor is weed itself!) In other words, the two scenes with Cera are entirely superfluous to the story, they don't have us gain any insight into the characters (other than weed choice), and in general are just a waste of the audience's time. They don't make the characters any more relate-able, they don't draw you into the story, they just sit there like giant boxes on a storyboard taking up time and space but not advancing anything.

In a similar vein, we learn that another character's wife is baby crazy. This character being baby crazy is not used for comedic effect, it doesn't affect the actions of the main characters in any way, and again just takes up time. The movie would be exactly the same (the characters would still have motivation and do exactly the same things) if that entire character was excised from the script! So if that character is a giant GNDN, why are we wasting time learning about them?

Both of these scenes really typify the problems that Hits has; it has the genesis of a lot of funny ideas but few are seen through to completion and payoff. Baby crazy lady could make an unexpected entry into the final train wreck scene, adding tension and zaniness. Instead she attends safe and sound via teleconference -- no zaniness or tension there. The other character's choice of weed (or even tendency to smoke weed!) could have been used to play off the cops that are around town. Nope. Even one character who is caught peeping in a window is never brought to justice nor is said peeping ever referenced again. What a waste!

The giant train wreck at the end is a proved winning formula for a movie, but unfortunately comes very late. Moreso, it isn't a large enough train wreck payoff to satisfy the journey getting there. It needed more characters' threads coming together rather than only three to be a really satisfying payoff. More to the point, the great reveal is handled fairly ham-handedly and is formulaic.

There are some funny scenes in Hits, but as Cross' own introduction says you'll laugh more than three times but definitely less than ten. The movie itself isn't a train wreck, but I really wish it was more (and paradoxically, less) than it currently is.

The writer of this movie is so out of touch with reality. I couldn't even finish it. Just shows how many uneducated people are in "Hollywood."

This movie was a surprise.

From the beginning, the plot and the evolution of the story depict characters' "passions" and obsessions. Those obsessions are moving the characters away from self awareness. I understand that there is a tendency in the movie to criticise the presence and the usage of social media in our every day lives. Which may lead to the obsession of image cultivation, of a successful media persona. Everyone want a piece of the success story so bad, without analysing what success is.

Well no spoilers but the finale is simply magnificent. A psychiatrist's happy end. A real substantial drama.

... following in the footsteps of Becky Sharp and Tracy Flick (with, in Hagner's case, maybe a touch of Kimmy Schmidt). Others on this site have focused mainly on the director, David Cross, and on supporting players like David Koechner and Michael Cera, mysteriously ignoring the star of the movie. To my mind, Hagner is by far the best thing in it: funny, indomitable, slightly crazed, touching in a small-town American way, and thoroughly adorable. In scene after scene, she's never less than charming and amusing. I wish we'd seen even more of her, as well as more of Amy Sedaris, disappointingly wasted in a tiny role. As for the rest -- the satiric thrusts at small-town eccentrics, etc. -- I willingly went along with it.

It was also nice to see a film set in unglamorous upstate New York. (The last one that made such good use of an upstate town, I think, was "You Can Count on Me.") For that matter, too few films target the politically correct hipster culture of Brooklyn, or at least too few do so with such merciless accuracy as this one.

I wish the damn film were currently available on some streaming service, as I'd like to see it again. But for now, it seems to have disappeared into memory.