[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesFilmes mais popularesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsDestaque do cinema indiano
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreNotícias de TV
    What to watchLatest trailersOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbFamily entertainment guidePodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuidePrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Central de ajudaContributor zoneEnquetes
For Industry Professionals
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

There Are Monsters

  • 2013
  • 1 h 30 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,4/10
613
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
There Are Monsters (2013)
Found Footage HorrorHorror

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaMonsters disguised as humans slowly take over the world. A student film crew discovers their existence and captures the terrifying transformation of society through their cameras while on a ... Ler tudoMonsters disguised as humans slowly take over the world. A student film crew discovers their existence and captures the terrifying transformation of society through their cameras while on a road trip.Monsters disguised as humans slowly take over the world. A student film crew discovers their existence and captures the terrifying transformation of society through their cameras while on a road trip.

  • Direção
    • Jay Dahl
  • Roteirista
    • Jay Dahl
  • Artistas
    • Kristin Langille
    • Guy Germain
    • Matthew Amyotte
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    5,4/10
    613
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Jay Dahl
    • Roteirista
      • Jay Dahl
    • Artistas
      • Kristin Langille
      • Guy Germain
      • Matthew Amyotte
    • 29Avaliações de usuários
    • 6Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
    • Prêmios
      • 2 vitórias e 1 indicação no total

    Fotos1

    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal49

    Editar
    Kristin Langille
    • Beth
    Guy Germain
    • Jeff
    Matthew Amyotte
    • Terry
    Jason Daley
    Jason Daley
    • Dan
    Malia Rogers
    • Fiona Faceslap
    Stephen Arnold
    • Professor
    Lauren Messervey
    • Video Girl
    Jacquie Thillaye
    • Beth's Mom
    Janessa Hunt
    • Beth's Sister
    Jamie Bradley
    • Beth's Dad
    Laura Bleasdale
    Laura Bleasdale
    • Receptionist
    Loretta Yu
    Loretta Yu
    • Teacher
    Gary Wang
    • Marty
    Deborah Britton
    • Mitosis Twin
    Lisa Britton
    • Mitosis Twin
    Joseph Tonen
    • Pigboy
    Bianca Marini
    • Horsegirl
    Kathryn McCormack
    Kathryn McCormack
    • Anne
    • Direção
      • Jay Dahl
    • Roteirista
      • Jay Dahl
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários29

    5,4613
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    4The_Sultan_of_Sin

    Could have been great - but isn't.

    This is a frustrating film. The premise, whilst not original, is good, and there are some good moments of creepiness here. But it's let down by some appalling problems in the execution, most notably the cinematography.

    Certainly, they were going for a particular style. The protagonists are low-rent documentary film makers, so the whole thing is filmed in a found-footage style. But no documentary film makers would shoot their footage like this; almost every single shot in the whole movie is a tight close-up on someone's face. Literally, from their eyebrows to their bottom lip. I am not exaggerating. There are virtually no mid-shots - there might actually be none - and I only saw one wide shot in the entire film. And during every close up of every face, the camera sways, and goes in and out of focus. It is truly nauseating.

    At the very end of the film, there is a wide shot, and it's really effective. But for the rest of the film, all you get are tight close-ups on the face of the person speaking. It doesn't matter whether they're having a group conversation around a table, walking around a room and conversing with people, or running for their lives. It's extremely tight crops the entire way. It must have been shot at 200mm. It is horrible beyond description, and leaves you with no sense of place or geography.

    Incredibly, things get even worse when our characters are running around in the chaos, because now we get zoomed in shots of nothingness, out-of-focus blur, and the camera inexplicably exhibits bizarre colour artifacts and other dropped-in After Effects styles, as if the cameras somehow begin to fail if you run whilst holding them, which makes it even more incomprehensible.

    Such a shame. They could have invested a few dollars into an old 1970s 28mm lens, and improved this movie immeasurably.

    The characters are, I'm afraid, another problem. They're just too stupid to live. Imagine if Brad Pitt, at the start of World War Z, saw that craziness erupt in downtown Philadelphia, and then just shrugged his shoulders and said "well, I'm sure it's nothing". That's this bunch of clowns in a nutshell.

    Like I say, this could have been great. There are hints of greatness, but it's all totally spoiled by the awful execution. The thing that annoys me is that it's not a budget issue, but issues that could have been easily resolved at no extra expense.

    I also just have to mention one bit where a character has to look out for threats using a smartphone, by taking photos using the flash to illuminate a dark space. Firstly, I'm pretty sure that if a smartphone has a flash, it can be used as a flashlight. You don't need to take photos with your flash, and then wait several seconds for the photo to appear on your screen, you can simply use the torch mode to look for threats. Secondly, they're LED based, and don't make the big build-up whining sound that camera flashguns from the 70s and 80s used to do, something apparently lost on the makers of this film. Bizarre.

    Avoid, unless you're a budding film-maker and want to see how not to shoot a movie.
    3shroyerw-1

    Good acting, okay story line, but the camera work? I can't even.

    The plot and the acting were both adequate, and even very good in places. It had intermittent "Us" vibes here and there which were creepy enough. But what really drags my rating for this down is the camerawork.

    "There Are Monsters" is what I call "quasi-found footage" - some scenes are supposed to be seen as if through the lens of one of the characters' camera, and for some scenes, it's obvious that no characters are recording it. If it were intended to be a bunch of amateurs, or kids, or anyone else who didn't know what they were doing, the camerawork might be somewhat excusable. But even in the "found" footage, the characters operating the cameras were supposed to be professional cameramen.

    My ass they were. The movie was so shaky and blurry in so many places, it really took away from the decent work of the actors. No professional cameraman would produce work like that, even on a job they weren't taking all that seriously. As if that weren't bad enough, they continued the horrible camerawork even in scenes that weren't intended to be "found footage". For instance, the main female protagonist entered a bathroom stall at one point. She was completely alone, no other characters were in the booth to film her. It was a steady picture at some points, but a jumbled, chaotic slurry of motion and digital myopia for the most part. There was no excuse for that.

    The only other thing I didn't like about it was the jump scares, but they didn't have more than maybe 5 of those. I just hate jump scares in their entirety, so that might be more of a "me" thing.

    Over all, if extremely shaky camerawork doesn't bother you, then I would definitely recommend this for you. Otherwise, I'd give it a pass.
    4jessicartim

    Good body snatchers movie but camera work ruined it

    First, I like the idea of body snatcher monsters and it was executed very effective in this movie. The characters, tension building, subtle effects, it all works here... but... what on Earth happened with camera?! Such a good movie completely ruined by what I can only call amateurish shaky blurry camera work. It's not only irritating, as the story/writing is actually engaging, but also quite uncomfortable to watch. Why oh why, you had it and you blew it completely!
    7Finfrosk86

    There are jump scares and shaky cams

    This was the very last movie at Glasgow Frightfest 2015. And quite a good one to end it all.

    The bad: This is, I assume for budgetary reasons, a found footage flick. Unfortunately this means quite a lot of shaky cam. Really, really shaky. Way too zoomed in, and shaky. Like, Blair Witch with Parkinson's. I was literally squirming in my seat hoping whoever was filming would just. zoom. out. And ever so often the movie cuts to these just wild zoomed in shaky parts, where you see absolutely nothing but blur. OK, got the bad out of the way!

    The Good: The good thing is that not all the filming is shaky, and pretty much all the actors did a good job. The movie was well paced and not boring (even after watching 5 movies before it, as this one was last). The characters are likable, and seem to have pretty good chemistry. There are some laughs to be had, too.

    The Scary: This movie actually gave me chills a couple of times! Kudos. Some of the sound effects, and visual effects, are pretty darn creepy. And a couple of the jump scares are very effective. Pretty cool. I especially liked how some of the creepy parts gets you thinking: was that actually a creepy effect, or was it my mind playing tricks on me?

    All in all it was pretty entertaining, and very good for a found footage movie. Good movie to see with a couple of friends, if you have those.
    6HunterGraham17

    Overall I enjoyed it

    I had fun watching it. Agree with everyone about the camera work. It's ironic how found footage really requires the most camera finesse out of all the horror sub genres. It's a balance that this movie leans a little too heavy in the shaky realm that eliminates some moments that could've been really impactful. Kudos to the special effects team though. Great visceral horror for a low budget film. Story was great too. There's a lot of doppelgänger horror out there but this one felt fresh. Horror is best when the gaps in the story are just wide enough for your brain to fill in the gaps and this had those moments without spoon feeding the plot to people.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Leaving D.C.
    6,1
    Leaving D.C.
    Abdução
    4,9
    Abdução
    Apartamento 143
    5,0
    Apartamento 143
    Em Outras Dimensões
    4,8
    Em Outras Dimensões
    The Lost Footage of Leah Sullivan
    5,5
    The Lost Footage of Leah Sullivan
    Evidence
    5,0
    Evidence
    There Are Monsters
    5,8
    There Are Monsters
    Ghoul
    4,6
    Ghoul
    Don't Peek
    5,2
    Don't Peek
    Barbárie em Sangre de Cristo
    6,0
    Barbárie em Sangre de Cristo
    #MissingCouple
    5,3
    #MissingCouple
    Sanatório
    4,9
    Sanatório

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      "There Are Monsters" earned awards at the Atlantic Film Festival for Best Director (Jay Dahl), Best Atlantic Feature, Best Cinematography (Kyle Cameron), and Best Actor (Kristin Langille).
    • Conexões
      References Armageddon (1998)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes14

    • How long is There Are Monsters?Fornecido pela Alexa
    • Can anyone tell me where I can actually watch this? I've been looking for a way to buy/rent/stream since it was released in 2013.

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 13 de setembro de 2013 (Canadá)
    • País de origem
      • Canadá
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • スナッチャーズ・フィーバー 喰われた町
    • Empresa de produção
      • Bun and Ham Productions
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      1 hora 30 minutos
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Proporção
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    There Are Monsters (2013)
    Principal brecha
    By what name was There Are Monsters (2013) officially released in India in English?
    Responda
    • Veja mais brechas
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.