Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaFollowing the death of CEO Robert Loring at precisely 10:44 pm, the FBI sends in Jordan Price, one of their best and brightest to solve the case. As other key executives are murdered at exac... Ler tudoFollowing the death of CEO Robert Loring at precisely 10:44 pm, the FBI sends in Jordan Price, one of their best and brightest to solve the case. As other key executives are murdered at exactly the same time, Jordan finds herself investigating the past in order to solve the case.... Ler tudoFollowing the death of CEO Robert Loring at precisely 10:44 pm, the FBI sends in Jordan Price, one of their best and brightest to solve the case. As other key executives are murdered at exactly the same time, Jordan finds herself investigating the past in order to solve the case. She quickly discovers the ultimate cover up and is under the gun to solve the mystery bef... Ler tudo
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 3 indicações no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
My personal rating system within the imdb universe is as follows:
1 Star - complete waste of time, to the point where I couldn't stand to watch it all the way to the end and turned it off. Usually this is 1/2 hour to 1 hour into the film. There are too many films worth seeing for me to waste much time on the turkeys.
2 Stars - basically a One Star movie, that I happened to watch all the way to the end. While I know I wasted time I can never get back there is a late night effect that makes me not want to start something else too late. So I take the attitude I always had when I went to the movies in theaters and paid cold hard cash to get in. To quote The Who - "Won't get fooled again."
4 Stars - I am basically house-bound so I watch a lot of gubbage that I really probably shouldn't. A 4 star movie is not a complete loss - although it can come pretty close. It certainly is nothing I would ever be willing to watch again. I know when I look up a film and discover I previously gave a flick a 4 star rating I will never make that mistake again. Consequently this is the most important rating I make. a 6 Stars - this is a reasonable movie and I could end up watching it again.
8 Stars - Good movies get 8 stars. If I've not seen them recently I will probably watch them again.
9 or 10 stars - a great movie. This is the sort of film I can watch almost any number of times, sometimes even over a very short space of time - like the time I watched "Bringing Up Baby" twice in two nights. Were I to use my preferred rating system I would make 4 Stars the top rating, with a symbol for complete trash (ie Leonard Maltin's BOMB rating). Quite frankly I think that 5 ratings in total more than adequately covers the field. Were I to publish a book like Shearer or Maltin or some others, I would not bother with half stars
My ratings are specific to my taste, obviously, but I think they give a pretty good indication of how I think others would react to these same movies, If they started with my rather eclectic taste and background. I tend to avoid Soaps, and "Heartwarming" movies altogether and my ratings reflect my distaste for this sort of gubbage. I am not an "It's A Wonderful Life" fan. Give me the
I like BITTER tales of nasty people gleefully doing vile things to each other - but usually with a sense of humour - or at least one of irony. I tend to avoid romantic comedies and "Scrooge" related stuff (although the Alistair Sim version of "A Christmas Carol" is a film I have watched roughly 1.5 times per decade since it first showed up on television in the 1950s. I've seen a couple other versions too - but mostly I can tell by watching the Trailers for these flicks that I would not be willing to watch the full movie (see "Heartwarming" above).
Horrible. Disappointed. Don't waste your time.
The start is really dry. The investigation is all stocks and money and boring. The two leads start sleeping together right away and there is no heat. It's over thirty minutes before the wacky murder premise is introduced. That is a problem. The movie should open with this ridiculous premise whether it's silly or not. They have to double-down. It's better than being bored to death for the first half hour. The FBI could come in after discovering this odd quirk of time. The investigation still doesn't get that much better.
People are being killed at 10:41 - with the killer actually checking his watch. An FBI agent (Kathleen Robertson) is brought in, and soon the murders are connected to a long-ago case that was called accidental.
I found this interesting, but it was solved too quickly and became predictable.
Average tv movie. Someone on IMDb stopped watching because he couldn't stand the lead woman's crossed eyes. Really? Her eyes are a little too close together- she probably had strabismus - so did Norma Shearer - and had to train the weak eye by wearing a patch. No care was taken with lighting or camera angles in this film. She was hardly a monster from outer space. And what a nasty thing to say.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoHaving been told that he is a possible target and hiring security, and then being told that both the previous victims were killed at exactly 10:44 pm, it is out of character that Miles Hayden would not stay awake and in the company of the security team between 10:30 and 11:00 pm and only go to sleep afterwards.
- Citações
Elliot Larken: You been on a lot of these?
Jordan Price: Nope. You?
Elliot Larken: No, but I brought stake-out snacks.
Jordan Price: Gummy worms?
- Trilhas sonoras1929-1971
Performed and written by Rich Aucoin
Published by Third Side Music Inc.
Courtesy of Sonic Entertainment
Principais escolhas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Time of Death
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 34 minutos
- Cor