Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaWhen an unknown assailant preys on a haunted hotel's patrons, an event planner teams up with a mysterious tenant whose dark past is the key to freeing the cursed hotelWhen an unknown assailant preys on a haunted hotel's patrons, an event planner teams up with a mysterious tenant whose dark past is the key to freeing the cursed hotelWhen an unknown assailant preys on a haunted hotel's patrons, an event planner teams up with a mysterious tenant whose dark past is the key to freeing the cursed hotel
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
A pretty stupid story but it has a decent foundation. You can easily see they had an idea then actually had to write a script around it. It reminded me a lot of the straight-to-rentals of the late 90's but that's not a bad thing. The deaths in the movie seem just written in to have a death but for the most part they're pretty cool. The antagonist has a pretty good look and then he talks and the dialogue is comical. The acting, cinematography, effects, sound design, and lighting are pretty good and it doesn't have that poor low budget look like a lot of movies shot on a low budget. I watch a lot of horror and most of it is pretty terrible so I actually do recommend this if you're looking for something different and kinda fun to watch.
Certainly not the greatest quality movie. There were a number of editing errors and line mistakes by actors. It could have almost moved to comedy/horror due to the actual concept of the movie.
It was a joy to see Judd Nelson on screen again and his quirky character was probably the most quality performance in the whole movie.
The character and setting development was a high point. Who doesn't love a good old haunted hotel kind of movie and the back story on the main characters kept me watching.
A really great story which could have been better done with a higher budget I'm sure. A good watch if there is nothing else on and you love the horror genre.
It was a joy to see Judd Nelson on screen again and his quirky character was probably the most quality performance in the whole movie.
The character and setting development was a high point. Who doesn't love a good old haunted hotel kind of movie and the back story on the main characters kept me watching.
A really great story which could have been better done with a higher budget I'm sure. A good watch if there is nothing else on and you love the horror genre.
Don't know why people have given this a poor rating. OK it's not a great horror film, but it is an easy watch and quite fun too.
The acting is good, and there are a few familiar faces from other productions people may have seen.
The story isn't bad either and makes a change from the usual 'teen' horrors and 'cabin in the woods' type of rubbish being churned out nowadays.
It's free to watch on Tubi too.
Asdsdf skdahsd ask asd hlalk dssadk l L L lsalsdlfs dflsldu ff g g g dsskfdjaskdf fd sa sd as d sa sioioiasd a as d s d wwef;wjef ewfodsfal sala c sdkfcvc vkkkf s; ;aoeifj aso asosodo swoso dpofue.
The acting is good, and there are a few familiar faces from other productions people may have seen.
The story isn't bad either and makes a change from the usual 'teen' horrors and 'cabin in the woods' type of rubbish being churned out nowadays.
It's free to watch on Tubi too.
Asdsdf skdahsd ask asd hlalk dssadk l L L lsalsdlfs dflsldu ff g g g dsskfdjaskdf fd sa sd as d sa sioioiasd a as d s d wwef;wjef ewfodsfal sala c sdkfcvc vkkkf s; ;aoeifj aso asosodo swoso dpofue.
For some reason Tubi original horror movies aren't pure garbage.
This one is actually an attempt of an interesting plot hook combo'd with a slasher.
Overall, there's a lot to like about this one, like some decent practical effects and set pieces.
However the direction and acting really hurt this film.
For one the acting (except Raimi and the male lead) is pretty bad. I'm not sure if the direction was just terrible: the cops constantly go into rooms with their guns out regardless of what is happening and they do so in the most exaggerated and ridiculous fashion.
The CG at parts is also really hit or miss. Some parts are well done, others look like flat renders someone made in 10 minutes.
The ending was also a bit of a let down. Really liked the hook but the resolution was really cliche.
Overall, give it a go if you want to see some decent shlock horror that tries to elevate it with an unusual story.
This one is actually an attempt of an interesting plot hook combo'd with a slasher.
Overall, there's a lot to like about this one, like some decent practical effects and set pieces.
However the direction and acting really hurt this film.
For one the acting (except Raimi and the male lead) is pretty bad. I'm not sure if the direction was just terrible: the cops constantly go into rooms with their guns out regardless of what is happening and they do so in the most exaggerated and ridiculous fashion.
The CG at parts is also really hit or miss. Some parts are well done, others look like flat renders someone made in 10 minutes.
The ending was also a bit of a let down. Really liked the hook but the resolution was really cliche.
Overall, give it a go if you want to see some decent shlock horror that tries to elevate it with an unusual story.
I wasn't expecting much from 'A Tubi original', but I was pleasantly surprised.
The pacing was tight, it was eminently watchable and the ending (if a bit predictable) didn't detract from the overall impact, as I had earlier feared it might.
Some of the FX were a bit dodgy, but others were fine. It's a bit like they had a time limit in which to film and couldn't miss deadlines, so couldn't go back.
Judd Nelson was the best actor, but some of the other acting was indifferent.
Overall, however, I didn't pause and go to Youtube once, as I often do if a film was dragging.
As I said I was pleasantly surprised and entertained for a low budget movie.
Worth a watch.
The pacing was tight, it was eminently watchable and the ending (if a bit predictable) didn't detract from the overall impact, as I had earlier feared it might.
Some of the FX were a bit dodgy, but others were fine. It's a bit like they had a time limit in which to film and couldn't miss deadlines, so couldn't go back.
Judd Nelson was the best actor, but some of the other acting was indifferent.
Overall, however, I didn't pause and go to Youtube once, as I often do if a film was dragging.
As I said I was pleasantly surprised and entertained for a low budget movie.
Worth a watch.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoNear the end when Goldie is explaining to Brayer that his plan is dangerous, she says "the people down there.. most of them have booked hotels in the room" instead of "rooms in the hotel".
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Dante's Hotel?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Отель Данте
- Locações de filme
- Los Angeles, Califórnia, EUA(setting)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 39 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente