Hammarskjöld

The film "Hammarskjöld" presents an informative look at the life and impact of Dag Hammarskjöld, the second Secretary-General of the United Nations. Hammarskjöld's tenure at the UN was marked by his commitment to resolving international conflicts, and his work during the Suez Crisis and Congo civil war was notable. His contributions to peace were recognized with a Nobel Peace Prize awarded posthumously.

Mikael Persbrandt's performance as Hammarskjöld is commendable. He effectively captures the diplomatic demeanor and the sense of duty that characterized Hammarskjöld's approach to international affairs. The film benefits from Persbrandt's portrayal, which adds a layer of authenticity to the historical narrative.

In summary, "Hammarskjöld" is a film that sheds light on a key historical figure and offers a solid performance from its lead actor. It serves as a respectable tribute to Dag Hammarskjöld's legacy in the realm of global diplomacy.

Definitely one of the best ever political thrillers ive seen ! Neverending thrilling!

Amazingly written, very poetic. The soundtrack is beautiful! Amazing cinematography! Filming is fantastic! However Editing fails sometimes, but nothing big.

It really manages to capture both the political person and the human of Dag Hammarskjöld that fought for the freedom he believed in.

Mikael Persbrandt really surprised me with one of his best ever performances of his career.

Deep, artful and a beautiful storytelling and directing. Extremely well put together!

A beautiful Swedish masterpiece of modern film. Hopefully you are watching Swedens contribution for best international film to the Academy Awards. Something very innovative and unique to Swedish film, made with true passion.

Its truly a film that makes you emotional.

A film you will remember! I truly recommend it! A must watch!

This was a really amazing, suspenseful, and uncut movie. A worthy cinematic retelling of the life of Dag Hammarskjöld. Persbrandt is at the pinnacle of his career, and it is very mesmerizing to watch the contrast between his apparent stern and concentrated exterior and his tender and loving interior.

The stage design is excellent. So many breathtaking vistas. Everything from the huge opulent New York to the impoverished villages of the Congo and our lovely Österlen here in Sweden. Amazing contrasts that elevate the movie and give it a wider viewpoint.

The movie wasn't that exciting. Not too much was going on. However, there was depth, curiosity, passion, empathy, and feeling. Everything that is required. Too much focus on action had shifted the focus on a deep & poignant diplomatic conflict to a more James Bond looked like show.

The music in the film is made by Raymond Enoksen. He truly figures out how to depict a feeling of renunciation and strategic halts with his tones. The music really elevates the film, and he does a really great job.

This is a phenomenal depiction of Dag Hammarskjöld and I truly suggest allowing the film an opportunity. You won't be let down.

The characteristics from Mikael Persbrandt perfectly add to the Dag Hammarskjöld the director wants us to see. No one can stare with his steelblue eyes as demanding as 'Gunvald' Persbrandt can; every inch a gentleman. At the same time, this eccentric diplomat with his poetry and bow tie knows that playing by the book won't bring him anywhere in his struggle to protect the weak and defenseless. Going his own headstrong way doesn't either, but that's his fate, as it is of international law in general. This biopic deserves therefor the same qualifications as Oppenheimer. The time is now for reassessment, before history swallowes the truth in undisclosed archives and fading memory.

I came away from this movie needing to go read up on Hammarskjöld's life because it seemed like this movie didn't do him justice. I came away thinking he was arrogant and bumbling, but Wikipedia quotes JFK refering to him as ' the greatest statesman of our century'.

There was the titillation of him maybe being gay which made me sad. It was illegal then and for most people the pain of not being able to live and love freely was awful and the film showed some of that. Despite there being little evidence to support the idea. I understand they may have been trying to tie in the content of his book.

But that story thread, the attempt to humanise him I suppose, took away from the real story, his role in intiating anti-colonialism, which ended up being over-simplified.

I enjoyed the movie. But it leftme wanting more rather than feeling satisfied.