Um épico de terror de várias histórias interrelacionadas sobre o desaparecimento de estudantes do ensino médio em uma pequena cidade.Um épico de terror de várias histórias interrelacionadas sobre o desaparecimento de estudantes do ensino médio em uma pequena cidade.Um épico de terror de várias histórias interrelacionadas sobre o desaparecimento de estudantes do ensino médio em uma pequena cidade.
- Prêmios
- 20 vitórias e 78 indicações no total
Scarlett Sher
- Narrator
- (narração)
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Weapons' blends mystery, horror, and dark humor through an innovative narrative featuring multiple perspectives and non-linear storytelling. Its suspenseful atmosphere, cinematography, and sound design are praised for creating tension. Garner and Brolin are noted as giving standout performances. However, some criticize the film's pacing, plot inconsistencies, and horror effectiveness. Despite mixed opinions on the film's unique blend of horror and comedy, many appreciate the film's ambition and original approach within the horror genre.
Avaliações em destaque
1) I love horror movies.
2) I avoided all trailers, marketing and reviews, so I am not a victim of overhyping.
3) I felt like this would be another example of a movie that will be unanimously praised and lauded as the best/scariest horror movie of the year. That seems to be the case.
4) Six stars is a positive score, but this review will be mostly negative as I try to explain why I didn't like this more.
5) The mystery is built masterfully. But once we find out who or what is behind the horror, all I could think is, "That's it?" I hoped there was more to the story or somewhere interesting the plot could go from there. But there really isn't.
6) They keep telling us more about the flawed characters, and have them involved in drama, which I enjoyed as it happened. But it doesn't come into play even a tiny bit, not with the story or any character arcs.
7) There are some really good horror elements and jaw-dropping moments. But I ask myself if I would watch this again, and the answer is... probably not.
8) It's a good movie, but I can't help but feel underwhelmed.
(1 viewing, opening Thursday EMX 8/7/2025)
2) I avoided all trailers, marketing and reviews, so I am not a victim of overhyping.
3) I felt like this would be another example of a movie that will be unanimously praised and lauded as the best/scariest horror movie of the year. That seems to be the case.
4) Six stars is a positive score, but this review will be mostly negative as I try to explain why I didn't like this more.
5) The mystery is built masterfully. But once we find out who or what is behind the horror, all I could think is, "That's it?" I hoped there was more to the story or somewhere interesting the plot could go from there. But there really isn't.
6) They keep telling us more about the flawed characters, and have them involved in drama, which I enjoyed as it happened. But it doesn't come into play even a tiny bit, not with the story or any character arcs.
7) There are some really good horror elements and jaw-dropping moments. But I ask myself if I would watch this again, and the answer is... probably not.
8) It's a good movie, but I can't help but feel underwhelmed.
(1 viewing, opening Thursday EMX 8/7/2025)
"Weapons" focuses on a Pennsylvania town where a large group of children-coincidentally (or perhaps not) from the same home classroom-flee their homes one night and disappear. Suspicion naturally falls on their teacher, but an intricate web of events unfolds, showcasing a dark, if not unbelievable, turn of events.
While writer-director Zach Cregger's "Barbarian" attracted a significant following among genre fans, I was not particularly a fan of that film; while I thought it had its share of strong elements and could see why some people loved it, the tone and genre-bending grotesque humor did not appeal to my taste. Because of this, I had tempered expectations for this film, but on the whole was pleasantly surprised. There is certainly dark humor here, but it is played in a more human way.
The screenplay utilizes segmented vignettes that interlock, forming a larger portrait of the strange, almost Stephen King-esque events unfolding in the small community. Tensions abound, as the missing kids' schoolteacher, Justine Gandy (Julia Garner) receives her scarlet letter, with grief-stricken parents such as Archer (Josh Brolin) blaming her for their children's disappearances. Further characters are thrown into the mix and each have their own narrative strands in the chain of events, including a struggling cop (Alden Ehrenreich), a young drug addict and petty thief (Austin Abrams), and the school principal Andrew (Benedict Wong).
While this narrative mode can often be hit-or-miss, it is played to great effect here and is clever without being too gimmicky or pretentious for its own good. On a purely technical level, the film is solid-the cinematography and locations are atmospheric, the sparse use of music and silence is pointed, and the performances are uniformly good from everyone involved. That being said, Amy Madigan, playing the aunt of the sole child in his class who didn't vanish into the night, steals the thunder from everyone , giving a performance that is of "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?" proportions.
Many have noted that the less you know about the film going into it, the better, and while I think that adage stands true for most moviegoing experiences, it is especially true here. The interlocking character vignettes are compelling in their own right, and the plot strands playfully connect by degrees, keeping the audience firmly planted on their toes. The truth eludes you until the outrageous final act, which is where I think the film could lose some people; however, by that point, I think even most hardened horror fans will remain invested due to the high level of intrigue that has brewed over the previous hour and a half. "Where could this possibly go?" was a recurring thought as I watched this, and even when it stretched credulity as the answers came, I remained firmly in the crosshairs, just as each of the children in Ms. Gandy's ill-fated homeroom. 8/10.
While writer-director Zach Cregger's "Barbarian" attracted a significant following among genre fans, I was not particularly a fan of that film; while I thought it had its share of strong elements and could see why some people loved it, the tone and genre-bending grotesque humor did not appeal to my taste. Because of this, I had tempered expectations for this film, but on the whole was pleasantly surprised. There is certainly dark humor here, but it is played in a more human way.
The screenplay utilizes segmented vignettes that interlock, forming a larger portrait of the strange, almost Stephen King-esque events unfolding in the small community. Tensions abound, as the missing kids' schoolteacher, Justine Gandy (Julia Garner) receives her scarlet letter, with grief-stricken parents such as Archer (Josh Brolin) blaming her for their children's disappearances. Further characters are thrown into the mix and each have their own narrative strands in the chain of events, including a struggling cop (Alden Ehrenreich), a young drug addict and petty thief (Austin Abrams), and the school principal Andrew (Benedict Wong).
While this narrative mode can often be hit-or-miss, it is played to great effect here and is clever without being too gimmicky or pretentious for its own good. On a purely technical level, the film is solid-the cinematography and locations are atmospheric, the sparse use of music and silence is pointed, and the performances are uniformly good from everyone involved. That being said, Amy Madigan, playing the aunt of the sole child in his class who didn't vanish into the night, steals the thunder from everyone , giving a performance that is of "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?" proportions.
Many have noted that the less you know about the film going into it, the better, and while I think that adage stands true for most moviegoing experiences, it is especially true here. The interlocking character vignettes are compelling in their own right, and the plot strands playfully connect by degrees, keeping the audience firmly planted on their toes. The truth eludes you until the outrageous final act, which is where I think the film could lose some people; however, by that point, I think even most hardened horror fans will remain invested due to the high level of intrigue that has brewed over the previous hour and a half. "Where could this possibly go?" was a recurring thought as I watched this, and even when it stretched credulity as the answers came, I remained firmly in the crosshairs, just as each of the children in Ms. Gandy's ill-fated homeroom. 8/10.
I'm surprised by all the "fantastic" reviews on this movie. It's definitely an ok film but in no way is this a 10/10 movie. It's a slow burn and then it goes into character POV, which is really unnecessary. It's too long and there are unanswered questions. I wasn't rooting for any of the characters except the ending scene (and you'll know what I'm talking about). So it's really just average. It could have been so much more. I'll never watch it again but I'm not upset that I saw it.
I'm tired, so I'll make this brief. I was entranced for the first and second act of this movie. Like, I was really into it. And that's rare these days, as I often find myself checking out in a lot of movies because the writing is just awful, and it's obvious that the director and producers don't care about half the crud they make anymore. But this was different. This was something special. I was actually really enjoying myself-pretty much all the way until the end. But then something changed. And it changed fast. It suddenly switched to a comedy. I was jolted out of my entrancement and was suddenly reminded that people who make movies nowadays just can't help themselves. Do they hate their audience? Do they just not understand their audience anymore? Or does the audience just love crud now, so they feel obligated to give it to them?
WHY did they play the end for laughs? WHY did they take a dive into the absurd? It wasn't by accident. The director clearly wanted us to have a laugh, but I just didn't understand why. All that buildup just to have a laugh at the absurd? I just don't get it. I don't regret seeing this, but knowing what I know now, I will never be revisiting this movie.
WHY did they play the end for laughs? WHY did they take a dive into the absurd? It wasn't by accident. The director clearly wanted us to have a laugh, but I just didn't understand why. All that buildup just to have a laugh at the absurd? I just don't get it. I don't regret seeing this, but knowing what I know now, I will never be revisiting this movie.
I liked Creggers' Barbarian a lot, but he didn't entirely stick the landing for me. Weapons is his sophomore effort, and you can see the confidence in direction and story telling is more refined. I had a blast watching this, as much as i love serious horror, Weapons wasn't afraid to inject some huge laughs to release the tension. Its gonna be hard to choose between this and 'Bring her Back', as my fave horror of the year thus far...
Most Popular Movies of 2025: #2 Weapons
Discover the most popular movies, series, and stars on IMDb in 2025
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
Sinister sequels, eerie indies, and blockbuster boo-fests — here are the most exciting horror movies and shows to add to your Watchlist.
Trilha sonora
Ouça aqui um trecho da trilha sonora e continue ouvindo na Amazon Music.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesTo further capitalize on the themes of the movie, theaters listed showtimes at 2:17, the same time the children in the film vanish.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe film is set in Pennsylvania where liquor can only be purchased in "State Stores". One can also buy wine in the state stores, but beer is purchased at package goods stores, bars, or some supermarkets. Nowhere in Pennsylvania can one buy liquor and beer at the same place.
- Citações
Gas Station Clerk: [as Justine runs from Marcus] Get outta my store!
Justine: Fucking help me!
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe New Line Cinema and Domain Entertainment logos have the sounds of children talking in the background.
- ConexõesFeatured in Tyrone Magnus: Weapons | Official Trailer | Reaction! (2025)
- Trilhas sonorasBeware of Darkness
Written and Performed by George Harrison
Courtesy of G. H. Estate Limited
By arrangement of BMG Rights Management (US) LLC
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
From Hurry Up Tomorrow to Highest 2 Lowest, take a look back at some of our favorite posters of 2025.
- How long is Weapons?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- La hora de la desaparición
- Locações de filme
- Atlanta, Geórgia, EUA(location)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 38.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 151.550.044
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 43.501.217
- 10 de ago. de 2025
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 269.050.044
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 8 min(128 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente




