AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,7/10
2,8 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
O plano de fazer uma viagem de volta para casa o mais curta possível começa a se desfazer quando Eric se vê equilibrando o relacionamento desafiador com suas duas irmãs e seu vício em um jog... Ler tudoO plano de fazer uma viagem de volta para casa o mais curta possível começa a se desfazer quando Eric se vê equilibrando o relacionamento desafiador com suas duas irmãs e seu vício em um jogo de pôquer local.O plano de fazer uma viagem de volta para casa o mais curta possível começa a se desfazer quando Eric se vê equilibrando o relacionamento desafiador com suas duas irmãs e seu vício em um jogo de pôquer local.
- Prêmios
- 3 indicações no total
Avaliações em destaque
Did Michael Cera lose a bet? My new least favourite movie. So odd, so so bad. A steaming pile of art that missed the canvass. Soulless and irritating. After the first 20 minutes I kept watching out of pure morbid curiosity for how it could possible end. It says the runtime was one hour and thirty one minutes, but the second and third acts just barrelled on for what felt like weeks. I aged watching this film. I need two hundred more characters for this review, so I'll finish by listing things I'd rather watch: paint dry, puppies cry, YouTube videos of 1990s commercials, promotional videos for timeshare condos, the Montreal Canadians.
I like(d) Michael Cera (the leading actor) comical charisma before in many other movies, one being in Barbie recently. Michael Cera was even producer of this movie himself so he must have had a lot of cloud to mold this movie, but it unfortunately fell flat.
The bad: it isnst a comedy, not even a quirky one. It isnt a drama for sure either. It is some sort of slowburning and BLAND portrait of 3 siblings (1 brother, 2 sisters) who get together again after a long time no see.
No surprising storyline. No original direction. No impressive technical details (sound, photography). No actor's chemistry.
I guess they wanted to create a quirky, comical personal portrait, but they failed big time...
The bad: it isnst a comedy, not even a quirky one. It isnt a drama for sure either. It is some sort of slowburning and BLAND portrait of 3 siblings (1 brother, 2 sisters) who get together again after a long time no see.
No surprising storyline. No original direction. No impressive technical details (sound, photography). No actor's chemistry.
I guess they wanted to create a quirky, comical personal portrait, but they failed big time...
Really interesting to see the mixed opinions on this. I really enjoyed it. It's a beautiful portrayal of sibling relationships, and so much in the movie is in what's unsaid. This can sometimes be frustrating in movies like this but there's so much depth in the characters and performances from the three leads that you can feel their complexities and pain, but also the unique connection they have. Reminiscent of the also great Skeleton Twins. I think it's currently really underrated on here and I'm glad I decided to watch it, based purely on a clip of Michael Cera's (excellent) Tony Soprano impression.
I never had a secret cartoon voice with my brothers growing up. But I was fascinated by the quirky relationship between the three siblings in "The Adults". I took a gamble on the movie, because Sophia Lillis was in it, and I remembered Michael Cera from Juno and Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. Seeing Michael Cera as an adult was sad. His sister Rachel was nicknamed Mopey Mopey, but Michael's character Eric was the one who moped around the whole time. He looked beaten down and barely squeaked out an emotion. This was juxtaposed to Sophia Lillis' character Maggie who had no problem showing her emotions. Since Michael's depressing character, Eric, was the protagonist, I had trouble getting through a number of his scenes, including most of his scenes when he was gambling in the shady backroom poker games. It was hard for me to see the man he had become after both of his parents died. From personal experience, after my mother passed away, it was hard to get the brothers back over for family dinners very often. Life got busy, and mom wasn't there to bring everyone together anymore. I see this with the three siblings in the movie.
The best parts of this movie were watching the three siblings reconnect through their cartoon language and their musical theater routines. Those elements felt real to me. My guess is that the writer based these on actual experiences. The longer Eric stayed with his sisters and fell back into his childhood world, I think the better adult he became. His sisters seemed to improve their disposition the longer he stayed with them also. It was interesting watching Rachel try out her cartoon voice with a co-worker who didn't get it. She was becoming more of herself, and perhaps eventually others will start appreciating her creativity. My older brother is the practical joker. He's also a very creative person as a writer. As a grandfather, he is teaching his 3-year-old granddaughter all kinds of annoying habits that he was laughing about, such as telling her that her dad went bald because a squirrel came and ate his hair. Perhaps he said a skunk came. I often block out what my brother says! Then, he gets a call from his daughter asking what he's been telling his granddaughter. She was asking her dad about the squirrel who came to eat dad's hair and if it was coming back to eat her hair! My brother thought this was hilarious. My brother is 72 years old and still not what you would call an adult. Perhaps we never grow up or if we grow up too much, it doesn't hurt to remember what we were like as kids.
This was by no means a perfect movie, but if you enjoy watching strong acting performances, I recommend it. It was another great role for Sophia Lillis. And I'll give an honorable mention to Mopey Mopey, Hannah Gross. I believed her, and by the end, I felt for her character. I wouldn't mind visiting with the siblings again one day to see their newest song and dance routine!
The best parts of this movie were watching the three siblings reconnect through their cartoon language and their musical theater routines. Those elements felt real to me. My guess is that the writer based these on actual experiences. The longer Eric stayed with his sisters and fell back into his childhood world, I think the better adult he became. His sisters seemed to improve their disposition the longer he stayed with them also. It was interesting watching Rachel try out her cartoon voice with a co-worker who didn't get it. She was becoming more of herself, and perhaps eventually others will start appreciating her creativity. My older brother is the practical joker. He's also a very creative person as a writer. As a grandfather, he is teaching his 3-year-old granddaughter all kinds of annoying habits that he was laughing about, such as telling her that her dad went bald because a squirrel came and ate his hair. Perhaps he said a skunk came. I often block out what my brother says! Then, he gets a call from his daughter asking what he's been telling his granddaughter. She was asking her dad about the squirrel who came to eat dad's hair and if it was coming back to eat her hair! My brother thought this was hilarious. My brother is 72 years old and still not what you would call an adult. Perhaps we never grow up or if we grow up too much, it doesn't hurt to remember what we were like as kids.
This was by no means a perfect movie, but if you enjoy watching strong acting performances, I recommend it. It was another great role for Sophia Lillis. And I'll give an honorable mention to Mopey Mopey, Hannah Gross. I believed her, and by the end, I felt for her character. I wouldn't mind visiting with the siblings again one day to see their newest song and dance routine!
Another slice of life movie with no plot or direction or ending. This seems to be all the rage these days amongst cerebral directors and writers.
Perhaps this is how Dustin Guy Defa grew up with his siblings. Who knows. It's all very well to regurgitate your adolescence but it still needs to be engaging for it's audience.
This film will polarize people between those that think it's quaint quirky and unique and others who find it unrelateable. I fall into the latter camp. It never quite hits the mark. You come away feeling empty and confused as to what was the point of it all.
There was one scene I thought was well executed. Without giving it away it involves Ceras character cleaning up at the poker table by out bluffing his opponents. The juxtaposition of what happens when he leaves the venue is fascinating.
Ps this is 10% comedy and 90% sibling drama.
Perhaps this is how Dustin Guy Defa grew up with his siblings. Who knows. It's all very well to regurgitate your adolescence but it still needs to be engaging for it's audience.
This film will polarize people between those that think it's quaint quirky and unique and others who find it unrelateable. I fall into the latter camp. It never quite hits the mark. You come away feeling empty and confused as to what was the point of it all.
There was one scene I thought was well executed. Without giving it away it involves Ceras character cleaning up at the poker table by out bluffing his opponents. The juxtaposition of what happens when he leaves the venue is fascinating.
Ps this is 10% comedy and 90% sibling drama.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesMichael Cera wrote the childhood songs the siblings perform.
- Trilhas sonorasL-Train
Written by Jordan Pilz, Daniel Alvarez de Toledo
Performed by TOLEDO
Courtesy of Grand Jury Music
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Adults?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 31 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente