[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
Voltar
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro
Viral (2016)

Avaliações de usuários

Viral

81 avaliações
6/10

Zombies for beginners.

I quite enjoyed this film, I felt if I'd watched it at the age of sixteen I'd have loved it. As a story it's of course been done to death, but the delivery was pretty good, some nice rounded characters, with some great interplay, particularly between Emma and Stacey. The makers obviously felt no need for endless gore and violence, more subtly then terror. Trouble is we've all gotten used to hard hitting, no holds barred zombie films and serials, this would be a tad slow for many. It was watchable. 6/10
  • Sleepin_Dragon
  • 1 de jan. de 2018
  • Link permanente
5/10

Great characters - but deeply lacking as an "outbreak" movie.

A virus breaks out causing the infected to lose their faculties and attack the healthy. In a small American town two sisters try to survive on their own when their parents are locked outside the quarantine zone.

This film starts off really well. The two female leads are excellent, with strong engrossing characters. Watching them live their ordinary lives is great viewing. The relationship between the two sisters, one who is sexually active and the other not, is played out with great skill. As things start to head south they deal with the situation as best they can.

This is where my praise for the movie ends. You can actually hit the pause button and see the exact second where some company executive taps the director on the shoulder and says "hey, bud, you remember this is a Sci-fi right?"

The director and writers obviously weren't up for this. I think they probably asked the guy from the local comic book store for advice. As all the hard work and investment in the characters is thrown away to stick some ridiculous tentacles in - then try and pass it off with some very flaky biology.

I am a big fan of sci-fi, especially post apocalyptic stories. This fails to deliver on both accounts. Despite my tastes I would rather this had panned out as a coming of age movie.

Watch it for the characters, then turn it off to avoid the laughable appearance of the actual virus.
  • thekarmicnomad
  • 24 de abr. de 2017
  • Link permanente
4/10

Fine, but not that much

  • eismoc
  • 25 de mai. de 2018
  • Link permanente
7/10

More Believable Six Years Later

Had I seen VIRAL in 2016, like others I'd have been frustrated by the stupidity of characters pulling off - or never putting on - their masks during a viral outbreak. "How ridiculous!" I would have opined, "NO ONE would be that stupid!" How time sadly changes perspective.

This isn't "World War Z" and doesn't try to be. It treads closer to a teen-centric "Contagion," focused on character rather than gore. The performances of Black-D'Elia and Tipton as sisters of varying temperament and maturity ring true, and a budding romance evolves as organically as one might under this circumstance.

I found VIRAL satisfying as a sisters-under-duress-sticking-together kind of movie, and as for the believability of people behaving recklessly and stupidly during a pandemic? This movie was certainly ahead of its time.
  • chris60
  • 6 de ago. de 2022
  • Link permanente
7/10

Great Little Non-Zombie Zombie Movie

Did I have a good time watching this? Absolutely. Would I watch it again? Yep. Would I recommend it? Certainly.

If you don't nitpick it to death, this is an entertaining, well made, contagious critters in your blood movie. The actors all do a good job, some of the characters are memorable, the writing is fresh, the photography looks good, and the director knows his job. I wish more movies in this genre were this good.

As for those panning this movie, I'm glad I don't have to sit through watching a movie with them, or anything else, for that matter. They're probably the type who complain about everything but contribute nothing of their own.

The people who made this movie spent the money they had, and they spent it well. They ended up with an entertaining, scary movie about highly contagious blood borne parasites....nasty little buggers too, and I had a great time watching it.
  • yossarian100
  • 28 de jul. de 2016
  • Link permanente
3/10

Had potential....

Viral starts out interesting and compelling. Forget that it follows every cliché in the book concerning viral outbreak / zombie / infected films. Even the main character was likable. Until the events started to cause uproar and chaos.

Then suddenly cautious Emma Drakeford (Sofia Black-D'Elia) becomes a total idiot. What is the point of a mask if you keep removing it? I swear she keeps taking that damn thing off at moments where it was needed the most. That kind of stupidity is just infuriating. Her big sister Stacey Drakeford (Analeigh Tipton) is even worse who for some reason can't be bothered to care what is happening around her outside her little world. She gets bored by breaking news reports,warnings and presidential speeches about health care and safety measures. Instead she chooses to ignore what is happening not so far from her home and party instead. She even suggests her little sister shouldn't take things so seriously. Yeah, real good advice Stacey! Still I was fine with that since I was hoping that the film at least would give us something nice on the side to chew on. Like some real hair rising thrilling scenes or some bloody and gruesome action. But no, the jump scares are predictable to a tee. And the few scary or creepy moments that could have been terrifying are ruined by the severe lack of tension or dread. The whole movie suffers from not making it clear how dire the situation is. It relies too much on the imagination of the audience and in this case I find that unacceptable. The clicker zombies or infected sounded too much like the ones in video game Last of Us. I am not sure what to think of that. If directors Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman have borrowed or were heavily inspired by the fungal zombies of that game would it have hurt them to take it to next level and come with some of their own ideas thrown into the mix to make it more interesting? Predictable monsters are boring. So all you have to do is make them unpredictable to make it fun. These clickers were as scary as fluffy bunnies and cuddly bears.

I already wasted too many words on this since I can't tell you how disappointed I was. Viral had real potential. But nothing creative has been done to make this film stand out from the rest. If you have seen a million zombie / infected films like I have you expect more. This is a complete waste of your time. So do not watch this!
  • chrichtonsworld
  • 13 de abr. de 2017
  • Link permanente
6/10

Welcome to "Viral"

It has come to my attention that Hollywood loves a good epidemic to shake us at our core. With recent film like "Blindness", "Contagion", "Maggie" and "The Bay" being just a small few to name, they really allow us to fantasize and view what could become of earth if an epidemic overtook us.

"Viral" is another film to add to your collection of "Disease Outbreak Films".

Emma (Sofia Black D'Elia, "The Night Of") is a new fish in a small pond. Starting a new school and moving to a new house all at once makes her shy and nervous, unlike her big sister Stacey (Analeigh Tipton, "Two Night Stand") who rather live freely and outspoken. When a virus mysteriously breaks out, trapping their mother at the airport. Their father (Michael Kelly, "Secret in Their Eyes") is forced to go get her; trapping himself in the progress. Emma and Stacey must now deal with fending for themselves and surviving this unknown virus.

Screenwriters Christopher B. Landon ("Scouts Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse") and Barbara Marshall craft a small and tight knit script that offers some scares at times but overall lacks in momentum and storytelling unlike its aforementioned "Disease Outbreak Films". This would rather focus on the characters of the story than the disease itself, Which is fine if and only if you balance the two. Landon and Marshall would rather us pay attention to Emma and how she is affected by the virus that is rapidly changing those around her. But with Emma not being a strong character, to begin with, or lacking emotional gravitas I found myself not caring about the difficult choices she had to make throughout the film. Now don't get me wrong, she is a very confident, smart and likable character. It's just her actions make less sense as the film progress leaving us - the audience to wonder what we might have done differently in her situation.

And this is the real reason why this film suffers its setbacks. If it had been released first before any outbreak film or tried to adapt or acquire new details to this ever growing genre we would have embraced and welcomed it. But because we've seen this countless times, Nothing is new to us. Which is why I found myself wanting the film to pick a side to land on. Landon and Marshall are not so much at fault here - They do create interesting and likable characters and establish a backstory that shapes the reason why our two leads find themselves in this predicament.

Directors Henry Joost & Ariel Schulman ("Catfish" and "Nerve") feed off tension and unease as they follow the little details of this virus. After the success of "Catfish", "Paranormal Activity 3", and "Paranormal Activity 4", coincidentally both written by Landon. They have an eye for found footage horror, which maybe this could have been - I think we're all happy it's not.

"Viral" is a new addition to our list of "Disease Outbreak Films", Sadly I don't think it will make our list of "Best Outbreak Films".
  • geraldohanna
  • 29 de jul. de 2016
  • Link permanente
5/10

It was just mediocre...

This movie had potential, especially since it took place during the early stages of an infection that would affect many people.

But the movie ultimately failed to cash in on its potential, and ended up being a mediocre movie that somehow felt like an attempt of mixing the zombie genre with elements from "The Strain".

It should be mentioned that "Viral" does have good acting performances from a good cast. And the movie also has good special effects and CGI effects.

But the movie was just suffering from being too generic and predictable. And the ending to the story was a slap to the face with a cold fish.

"Viral" offers nothing of any interest, and if you are a seasoned horror fan, like I am, then you are better off finding something else to watch because "Viral" is not all that interesting.
  • paul_m_haakonsen
  • 16 de jun. de 2018
  • Link permanente
7/10

Very enjoyable for the most part

This movie can surprise you the idea was well executed and the two leads felt like actual sisters, to me that's the high point in the movie how their relationship unfolds, they are complete opposites still in the situation they care for one another, and the roles from strong and weak will go back and forth.

Sadly everything else is fairly passable as it focuses on what happens when your cut off and teenagers make some dumb decisions, I can say this could have been better but the way it was executed was pretty enjoyable.

The parasite idea I thought was pretty good.

I recommend this one but be ready for a slow burn.
  • DogFilmCritic
  • 1 de ago. de 2016
  • Link permanente
3/10

Mindlessly derivative

  • Leofwine_draca
  • 5 de jul. de 2020
  • Link permanente
8/10

Not a bad low budget film at all

Great cinematography, sound was OK, not awful like many I've seen, story was typically standard but, did leave me wanting a sequel... There you go, proves it has potential, the characters were likable, you wanted them to win, even with the shocker near the end. VISUAL FX wrte pretty good, that impressed me, the transition was clean.

What made this film good was having that psychological aspect rather than raw gore zombie style virus outbreak in your face being thrown at us, I love this, it's refreshing to have as zombie films can get a little tiresome after a while.

I would like to see a sequel, what are the chances?
  • celticstormfilms-594-545980
  • 13 de jun. de 2024
  • Link permanente
6/10

The Infected

It starts off as a drama, but quickly tunrs into a horror movie. Well I reckon it is rather slow - once it turns around. And it stays with you - it does try to encapsulate the horror from past days, old school as some might call it. References to something like Body Snatchers and other movies can be felt, while I wouldn't say they are being ripped off or stolen from.

This is still original for what it is and it does a solid job overall. Unfortunately there is something deeper missing - even when you care about the characters on screen, something that lights the fire, makes this really go places that make it truly great. There are things that cannot be explained (no pun intended) ... decent horror movie with quite the mayhem towards the end ... and some solace I reckon (maybe?)
  • kosmasp
  • 13 de ago. de 2021
  • Link permanente
3/10

Typical Teenage Trash

I wanted to like this movie, I really did, but once I realized that it was Blumhouse production, I knew I was going to be sorely disappointed. If there was ever a production company that catered to the worst parts of horror, and to the lowest hanging fruit in society, it's Blumhouse. What they have done to soil horror in the last 20 years will not be easily remedied, and this movie is no exception. Teenagers you can't stand start contracting a virus that makes them violent and belligerent. Town is quarantined. Shoehorned romance. The End. Nothing about this movie is original or well-done, and the ending left such a horrible taste in my mouth that I physically spit up phlegm. One of the worst of the PG-13 crap that has been permeating cinema as of late, it screams of lack of creativity, vision or care. In fact, the only saving grace about this movie is that the acting was actually very well done. The rest of the film? Garbage, pure and simple. Do not make the same mistake I did and avoid this movie like is actually spreading a virus. Pathetic.
  • manuelasaez
  • 30 de jul. de 2016
  • Link permanente
7/10

Catch It!

This is definitely not a blood and guts zombie rampage, although there is the occasional gross scene or fight. Instead it is a character piece about the relationship between two sisters, and it is done pretty well.

The characters are likable and believable in their relationship, it just so happens that the family issues they have are being resolved during some sort of viral outbreak that has many of the same characteristics of a zombie apocalypse. There is some good world building on that end too, with differing creature rules from your average zombie horror, but most of this is put to the side for the actual family dynamic, so there is still stuff to be explored.

This is a small scale story in a bigger world, but still has enough quality to be an entertaining and heartfelt piece. The only real problem is the predictable and somewhat generic ending, especially considering how thoughtful and interesting the rest of the film is, maybe they ran out of steam. Still worth a watch though, just don't expect a raging kill-fest.
  • scythertitus
  • 17 de ago. de 2016
  • Link permanente
7/10

If you like zombie or "world falling apart" movies, chances are you will like this movie!

Unlike pretty much every zombie movie ever this movie actually explores the one way that zombie like behavior could genuinely happen, through a virus or parasite affecting basic behavior(rabies for instance cause the infected to become hygrophobic and afraid of water).

So far this is the best Zombie movie I have seen, not from an action or survivalist perspective but as far as story, concept and execution is concerned it is heads and tails above anything else I have seen to date.

If you are fed up with zombie movies being more splatter and low brow than actually story line you will probably find this movie to be an intelligent breath of fresh air brought to the genre.
  • mastermaker-27886
  • 10 de out. de 2016
  • Link permanente
3/10

Ugh...

  • drm2642
  • 11 de jun. de 2017
  • Link permanente
6/10

I enjoined the film, it's OK.

  • subxerogravity
  • 30 de jul. de 2016
  • Link permanente
4/10

Expecting Better From Blumhouse

  • mendzel
  • 27 de jul. de 2016
  • Link permanente
7/10

A not too bad little virus/zombie flick with an emotional component...

Viral is a not too bad little virus/zombie flick. Its pitched squarely at the late teen, early twenty something demographic but its accessible to older movie goers too.

Its a predictable, well worn formula for the most part. Virus leads to end of the world style zombie outbreak. There's something of an emotional component and focus to this film, that somewhat "softens" it and makes it more thought provoking than your standard zombie fare. What happens to families and people in general, when a disaster occurs, how does it shape our behaviour and influence our loyalties?

Its a nice touch that lifts this film above a lot of similar films in the survivalist/zombie horror genre. Its reasonably well acted too, which is also a plus.

All in all, a well scripted, directed and acted film that's an enjoyable, if at times sad watch. Seven out of ten from me.
  • s3276169
  • 6 de ago. de 2016
  • Link permanente
2/10

How slow can you go...

I wanted to give this one star, but I actually have nothing against the special effects, so I added another star.

Yes, so the effects were believable, the rest of this movie - not so much. I think this might be the slowest paced horror movie I have ever seen. What a drag to watch. And I honestly think this had so much potential.

The acting wasn't all that bad, but most of the time I didn't believe the characters. You don't get to form any connection with this story.

I went in not knowing what to expect. I haven't even seen the trailer. I checked out the trailer afterwards and man, I was grateful I didn't go watch this on account of the trailer. Because the trailer is rather good and I think I would have felt even more cheated by this film, if I went in with any expectations. Wish the whole movie followed the pace of the trailer.

There was one thing that really stood out though (and unfortunately it's not a good thing), but it's like the director or cinematographer had a love affair with the slow pan. A pan is not a bad thing, but it gets in the way if that's the only thing you notice instead of it subtly adding to context or story.

This movie really gave me the sense of lazy film making. There is absolutely no suspense build up and there was maybe one "edge of your seat" moment. It had quite a few scares, but once again, lazy and unfortunately poorly executed, scares. I mostly flipped out of my seat because of sudden big crashes and overbearing noises to add scares. But I really feel cheated by these techniques. Scream is a good movie to teach you all about creating some good scary moments. And I am Legend, knows how to build up some good tension. Viral, however, lacks the "scary" and lacks the "tension".
  • renewesthuizen
  • 17 de set. de 2016
  • Link permanente
8/10

A teen drama in the middle of a quarantine

The Blumhouse production company presents a story that, even with some horror elements, tries to be something different, focusing more on drama and science fiction. Viral is a film that at the time was not a big deal, but after the pandemic, it can now be seen from another perspective. This movie is a drama with suspense elements focused on 2 teenage sisters who have to survive in a quarantine. At first glance, the movie seems like just another silliness, but it has certain elements that many have ended up experiencing in the pandemic. People who cannot leave the house, mandatory use of masks, young people going to a party regardless of the risks. The crazy thing is that Viral ends up being another movie that predicted what would happen in 2020. You could say that Blumhouse hit the nail on the head with this movie, as that combination of drama and suspense makes the movie a bit more realistic. Even the filmmakers decided to be subtle in making this film because Blumhouse often works on a moderate budget and doesn't bother to show how the rest of the world is falling, that's just left to the viewer's interpretation. The concept of the parasite is good and it sure had a lot more things that could have been implemented if it weren't for the moderate budget. Viral is in conclusion a simple, but accomplished science fiction and suspense drama. My final rating for this movie is 8/10.
  • Elvis-Del-Valle
  • 3 de ago. de 2023
  • Link permanente
7/10

The worm that turned.......

  • FlashCallahan
  • 10 de out. de 2016
  • Link permanente
4/10

Teenie-Mess in Outbreak Wonderland

  • Tweetienator
  • 14 de set. de 2019
  • Link permanente
7/10

A Decent Apocalyptic Story - Even A Bit Prophetic

I wasn't really sure what to expect when I started watching this. I knew it was made by Blumhouse - and I've had some very mixed reactions to Blumhouse movies over the years. I also wondered whether, to be honest, I really wanted to watch a movie about an apocalyptic outbreak of some kind of disease so soon after our own recent brush with a pandemic. (The movie was made in 2016, so it wasn't made in response to events of recent years.) Also, it was a cast that aside from Michael Kelly (who I'm familiar with from House of Cards) I was totally unfamiliar with. But I watched it, and in the end was quite impressed with it. It's a pretty good story with a good build-up; it's fairly short and well-paced and it kept my attention all the way through.

I liked the two young leads. Sofia Black-D'Elia and Lio Tipton did a good job. Playing sisters who share a somewhat strained relationship, they're attending high school in a town they've just moved two when a strange disease caused by some sort of parasite starts infecting people. Because of our own recent pandemic, there's a kind of familiar feel to some of this. There are a variety of online conspiracy theories that start to be spread about the disease, the disease spreads rapidly, and health measures, lockdowns and quarantines are implemented - and lots of people ignore them, allowing the disease to continue to spread. But it's also got a ring of incredulity to it. It's a zombie-like illness (the movie was, as I said, made in 2016 when zombies were all the rage.) But the story worked very well.

There's no doubt that you can just dismiss this as a B-movie in the horror genre. That's essentially what it is. It adds nothing particularly original to either the horror genre or the contagion angle. But that doesn't mean it isn't good. And in some of the ways I mentioned it does have an almost prophetic ring to it these days. (7/10)
  • sddavis63
  • 10 de dez. de 2024
  • Link permanente
7/10

okay so this one

Was okay i didnt know what i wanted from this movie really but it was so-so a movie nothing amazing just your standard viral horror flick really.
  • jntrla-05129
  • 19 de jul. de 2019
  • Link permanente

Mais deste título

Explore mais

Vistos recentemente

Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
Para Android e iOS
Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
  • Ajuda
  • Índice do site
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Dados da licença do IMDb
  • Sala de imprensa
  • Anúncios
  • Empregos
  • Condições de uso
  • Política de privacidade
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.