Avaliações de usuários

Christmas Eve in Miller's Point tells the story of a family who have a get-together on Christmas Eve at the family home & it could be their last holiday there. As the night goes on, arguments abound among different generations of the family. Meanwhile, one of the teenagers sneaks out, to paint the town red with her friends.

Christmas Eve in Miller's Point is just an average film. Director Tyler Taormina has given us a movie with a meandering story that doesn't really go anywhere, even when the credits roll. The scenes with the adults are pointless & are incredibly boring. The scenes with the teenagers are fun & are the saving grace of the film. Matilda Fleming is fantastic as Emily. Maria Dizzia is awesome as Kathleen. Francesca Scorsese is great as Michelle. Elsie Fisher is brilliant as Lynn. Michael Cera & Greg Turkington are hilarious as Officer Gibson & Sergeant Brooks, respectively. The supporting cast is effective. Christmas Eve in Miller's Point is not a must watch. Watch it if you're having a Christmas movie marathon & don't mind having an average movie in the mix.

Greetings again from the darkness. It's that time of year when we get bombarded with Christmas movies. Some are light-hearted comedies, while others play off the elevated emotions of the holiday season. Most of these seem to be harmless, although some are so lame that we can barely watch. Yet it seems most every year one or two surprise us by packing a punch. Writer-director Tyler Taormina and co-writer re-team after their underappreciated HAM ON RYE (2019) for the most unique Christmas movie we will likely watch this year.

This is certainly no vehicle for movie stars to make an easy buck. In fact, most of the faces won't be familiar, and that works to the film's advantage ... a shrewd casting move. Based in the 1970's, a large family Christmas gathering is happening on Long Island, and the little bits of story are captured through the blips of snippets of conversations we catch. This includes discussions about the family matriarch needing to be moved to an assisted living facility and whether or not the family home should be sold. There are secrets and grudges and familiar jokes, along with teenagers trying to look cool ... in other words, the same things that happen at most family gatherings plus the added stress of Christmas.

Some of the jigsaw pieces are in the form of a player piano, a pet iguana, an electric train, video games, and a dozing grandma. A few of the men escape to the garage for a cold beer, while one uncle plays the piano and sings a Christmas carol. Another uncle is obsessed with cooking his portion of the family feast and explaining each step to anyone who will listen. Of course, the feast is enough to feed three times the number of people in attendance, and yes, one adult gets stuck at the kids' table. There are presents opened and home movies that bring back memories - some good, some tear-inducing. Yet another uncle has his book draft read aloud, providing quite the surprise. Those "cool" teenagers do manage to sneak out, and this along with the goofy cops (Michael Cera, Greg Turkington), seem like bits that don't really fit. The exception is one red-wrapped gift that must be fished out of a dumpster, ultimately providing a touching moment.

Again, most of the cast will not be recognizable, but they handle their characters beautifully. The cast includes Maria Dizzia, Matilda Fleming, Steve Alleva, JoJo Cincinnati, Ben Shenkman, Chris Lazzaro, Tony Savino, Elsie Fisher, as well as a couple of well-known offspring in Sawyer Spielberg and Francesca Scorsese. Cinematographer Carson Lund provides the retro look and feel, with a dose of nostalgia that avoids the customary overdose of sentimentality. The film is more complex than it appears on the surface, and the offbeat flow allows for emotions, love, and chaos - even as Santa rides by on the firetruck. An unconventional soundtrack is filled with 1960's music rather than Christmas tunes, and that works just fine. The best compliment I can offer is that this feels as much like we are at the party as it does we are watching the party. And that's impressive.

Showing in select theaters.

Christmas Eve in Miller's Point (2024) is a quirky holiday dramedy directed by Tyler Taormina that has received mixed but intriguing reviews. Set in the mid-2000s, it follows a large family's last Christmas gathering at their longtime home before it's sold, blending nostalgia with hints of realism and sentimentality. The film excels at creating a genuine, lived-in family dynamic, with heartfelt moments balanced by understated humor. Critics have praised the naturalistic performances and the film's ability to avoid overly sentimental holiday tropes, capturing both the warmth and bittersweet realities of family life.

However, some found its structure and tonal shifts uneven. Scenes outside the family home, particularly involving teenagers wandering town, feel less grounded and overly constructed compared to the richer, more nuanced moments within the house. While the film avoids becoming overly cliché, its meandering plot-more a collection of small moments than a cohesive narrative-may leave some viewers wanting more direction.

Overall, Christmas Eve in Miller's Point offers a unique, slightly offbeat holiday experience, appealing to those who enjoy indie films with emotional depth, even if it occasionally feels uneven. If you're looking for something less conventional this holiday season, it's worth considering.

There is no plot. If you wait for a plot to arrive, you will be waiting until after the credits are over. If you are hoping for character development instead, prepare yourself for one dimensional characters some of which just disappear after being introduced never to return. If you want absurd scenarios that have no possible link to remote plausibility, then perhaps this is your show. I cannot understand how this was ever made if the script resembled this final product. And I can't understand what movie the positive reviewers were actually watching. Did we see the same show? First one star review.

A critic once famously described "Waiting for Godot", the absurdist two-act play written by Samuel Beckett in which the characters engage in much discussion but absolutely no action whatsoever and in which nothing is resolved, as "A play in which nothing happens...twice." Yet everyone, including the critic in question, consider the play as being a masterpiece of the 20th century. I, of course, apparently being a total dimwit, miss the point entirely.

The same can be more or less said of this film. Oh sure, a couple of things actually happen (a garishly decorated and lit fire truck, made up to look like Santa's sleigh, passes by an eagerly awaiting crowd, a bunch of teenagers manage to score some beer and drink happily in a parking lot before couples form to engage in some making out in various cars), but I can't help but feel it is nevertheless a film in which (almost) nothing happens...from beginning to end.

Indeed, the writer and director clearly mislead us into thinking that something WILL actually happen (the teens in question engage in some dangerously high speed racing, while two policemen who are expressly watching out for speeders are apparently oblivious to that), and you expect some sort of damage to ensue...and then the scene abruptly changes to another set of characters, and by the time we are back to the teens, they too are somewhere else.

I suppose the idea was to create a sort of "anti-film", in which various vignettes with no beginning are played out with no end either, but I can't but feel that this sort of "repeated slices of life" is, like Waiting for Godot, impenetrable to me. I hope it makes more sense to other viewers -- and apparently it does so, since other ratings on here are quite high.

So, as I said at the outset, I feel dumb -- never a pleasant experience.

One last point: the usual IMDB question "Does this review contain spoilers" made me laugh this time. In order for a review to contain spoilers, something actually has to happen in film that is exposed in the review. I don't believe that is possible for a film in which I have difficulty figuring out if anything of note actually happens.

Christmas Eve in Miller's Point is a stunning and strange film from Tyler Taormina, an uncompromising young filmmaker.

If you've seen Taormina's previous films, ("Ham on Rye" / "Wild Flies" / the dialogue-less "Happer's Comet") then you might have a sense of what is going to wash over you when you sit down for this, his first effort to see broader distribution.

Taormina's films exist outside of conventional genre and storytelling. They're funny, but they're not comedies, there's drama, but they're not dramas. Characters experience conflict and resolution, but no single thread that must be followed to its end.

Taormina's films offer an experience that feels totally alive, with characters you'll fall in love with, and moments that feel too ordinary to be Hollywood, as well as moments that seem to absurd to be faked.

This is a difficult film to share, because the press materials (accurately) depict a family Christmas movie featuring Michael Cera, but it's not what you'd expect from that at all. When trying to describe the film, it begins to sound "art house" and dry, but it's anything but.

It's a film I strongly recommend to anyone with an open mind and an open heart. Personally, the holidays are not a selling point for me (unless it's "Black Christmas" 1974), but the world Taormina and his excellent cast created was utterly enthralling.

There is literally no plot, no story, and no character development of any kind. What was the point of this? A full 45 minutes in, nothing has happened. It's just random people that we don't know, doing random stuff at a Christmas party, and none of it is interesting in any way. It starts with a family, so your thinking it's about the family, then we don't see them again for almost an hour after they walk through the door. Then we see a bunch of relatives in a typical Christmas gathering talking about people and things we know literally nothing about. It's like they just had a camera person walk into a random party and they just start filming. Who green lit this? If you want footage of some random family's Christmas where nothing happens, then this is the movie for you. Otherwise, pass.

This film is beautifully shot where we watch several generations of a large extended family experience Christmas Eve on what might be the last time in the family house. Everything that we see happening in that home reminds me a lot of similar family Christmas gatherings I have experienced in my life. The youngest generation, the school age kids see the wonder and excitement of Christmas. The director shows us the kid's perspective of Christmas lights, through special glasses, and how a young boy handles aunts and great aunts wanting to plant kisses on his cheeks. It is a large cast and they all feel very familiar. Miller's Point features an Italian family in Long Island, but the holiday traditions try they show could be in anywhere USA. The film has a warm feel to a familiar family Christmas.

There is a reason this movie is rated 5/10 and that is a very kind rating probably boosted by reviewers who have a stake in this production. If you're looking for a half decent movie to watch this season this one does not make the grade. What an absolutely boring pointless waste of time and the ending is the worst part of the worst Christmas movie I have ever seen. No humour anywhere in this dragged out monotonous story line. Seems to me if this was real the suicide rate in this town would be significantly above average. If you watch this movie anyway don't say you weren't warned that it is the most forgetful Christmas movie yo will likely ever see.

Christmas Eve at Miller's Point was, unfortunately, one of the most disappointing movies I've ever seen. It lacked a cohesive plot, storyline, or any semblance of character development. The film felt like a collection of random, disjointed conversations, introducing characters only to abandon them moments later without any follow-through.

The strange videography added to the confusion, with awkward close-ups on irrelevant details and unnecessarily long shots of background decor that served no purpose. It felt entirely random and odd, leaving me wondering how this ever became a movie in the first place.

Overall, it was a waste of time that left me frustrated and regretting the experience. This is not a film I would recommend to anyone.

Like someone already mentionen, this movie lacks everything. There is no story. There is no plot. There is no development. Just nonsense acting. It's as interesting as live streaming a boring familys Christmas doings. It is just randomness, utterly boring, mundane radomness.

Like someone already mentioned, this movie lacks everything. There is no story. There is no plot. There is no development. Just nonsense acting. It's as interesting as live-streaming a boring family's Christmas doings. The entire movie feels like a disjointed series of random events, strung together without any purpose or thought. The pacing is glacial, making it feel like an eternity.

The cinematography is uninspired, with flat scenes that scream low-budget and no effort.

Watching Christmas Eve in Miller's Point is a test of endurance. It's a film that doesn't just fail-it feels like it never even tried. Save yourself the pain and skip this one.

You deserve better for your holiday viewing.

A plotless film... A chaotic masterpiece, perhaps? I felt an immediate sense of belonging amidst the Christmas clamor in this house of diverse personalities.

It's as if you're a fly on the wall, observing every single character, mischievous children, and snippets of conversations lost in the festive din. And I love it.

The soundtrack is rich, the scenes fleeting, yet every frame is a visual delight. The credits reveal the joy that went into crafting this cinematic gem. I especially loved the first hour, after that it's somehow different, since scenes are out of the house.

Count me in for another viewing next year. :)

If you've watched Mark Kermode's YouTube review of this film (I did) then don't think he's wrong. It's a shocking, dull, boring, hotch potch of mock intelligent cinema that thinks it's on a higher level by ignoring that cinema is meant to be 'entertainment'.

The soundtrack is the best part of the film but that's probably because the editor realised when doing the cut that if you didn't keep the audience awake then the film was going to be an unmitigated disaster. It is now a mitigated disaster as the only mitigation is that the music track is worth listening to.

If Woody Allen had made it no doubt it would be genius. But he didn't.