Num lugar chamado Redenção, o ex-atirador Keller, o gênio louco Ben, guiados pelo líder espiritual Jericho, buscam vingança e confrontam seu passado violento. Sua nova paz está ameaçada pela... Ler tudoNum lugar chamado Redenção, o ex-atirador Keller, o gênio louco Ben, guiados pelo líder espiritual Jericho, buscam vingança e confrontam seu passado violento. Sua nova paz está ameaçada pela violência e pela vingança.Num lugar chamado Redenção, o ex-atirador Keller, o gênio louco Ben, guiados pelo líder espiritual Jericho, buscam vingança e confrontam seu passado violento. Sua nova paz está ameaçada pela violência e pela vingança.
Avaliações em destaque
So many things were wrong with this movie, from the costumes to the acting. They mentioned 357 ammunition, which wasn't even invented until the 1930's. Costumes were not period correct. They wasted a good opportunity to make a western movie for fans. The acting was sub par at best. The script lacked depth. The videography was exceedingly reliant on facial expressions. The entire movie was on par with a spaghetti western at best. I do not recommend wasting your time watching this movie. I've seen better acting in a children's play. Why did Nicholas Cage put his name on this mess. We're Western movie enthusiast and this did not live up to our expectations at all.
I like Dorff. I've enjoyed his work. He just couldn't carry this.
First, Kentucky was not the old west at the turn of that century. Cowboys weren't hanging out in saloons. Missed the mark completely there.
Cage I find to be hit or miss and this was a miss. Not sure exactly what his character he was going for, but the whole thing of retired bad guy returning to his lawless ways is trite, to say the least. Not sure if he was going for an odd Johnny Depp-type character but sorry, this just didn't do it.
Antagonist was a little too over the top for me.
The supporting cast was good, don't get me wrong, but the script was pretty lame for any of them to cut through.
The action was mid level, but there were scenes where it was hard to tell good guys from bad guys, who is shooting who?
I could go on, but...why? Watch this when it's free, I would not recommend paying. Sorry Stephen, I'll buy you a beer and talk about your good roles some day.
First, Kentucky was not the old west at the turn of that century. Cowboys weren't hanging out in saloons. Missed the mark completely there.
Cage I find to be hit or miss and this was a miss. Not sure exactly what his character he was going for, but the whole thing of retired bad guy returning to his lawless ways is trite, to say the least. Not sure if he was going for an odd Johnny Depp-type character but sorry, this just didn't do it.
Antagonist was a little too over the top for me.
The supporting cast was good, don't get me wrong, but the script was pretty lame for any of them to cut through.
The action was mid level, but there were scenes where it was hard to tell good guys from bad guys, who is shooting who?
I could go on, but...why? Watch this when it's free, I would not recommend paying. Sorry Stephen, I'll buy you a beer and talk about your good roles some day.
Saw Gunslingers. In a world where horrible modern day movies like Novocaine and Death of a Unicorn exist, Gunslingers is a much needed friend, an old school Western/Action shoot em up with sibling rivalry plot lines and a hilarious and awesome NICOLAS CAGE performance. You may ask why the negative mainstream reviews? That's because they don't respect B action films. They'll only sell you the latest Timothee Chamalet drek. If you can appreciate the efforts of a small film giving it their all, you'll enjoy this film. Sure, it's not perfect but you can appreciate it, flaws and all. Kudos to Lionsgate for delivering these films to the community of action lovers.
It's trash. Anyone who says it's good is literally lying just because they glaze Nicolas Cage.
The movie is literally a (try not to quit) challenge. It struggles a lot. The editing and the way some of the clips are put together feels like something from a director who's just starting out, like one of those indie projects you'd find on YouTube, but with a much higher budget. Some of the costumes look a little cheap and unpolished.
I was excited for this! But this is honestly the weakest western I've ever watched. Give the movie a chance if you wanna laugh at how off it is, but if you're watching for pure enjoyment, I'd probably stay away.
The movie is literally a (try not to quit) challenge. It struggles a lot. The editing and the way some of the clips are put together feels like something from a director who's just starting out, like one of those indie projects you'd find on YouTube, but with a much higher budget. Some of the costumes look a little cheap and unpolished.
I was excited for this! But this is honestly the weakest western I've ever watched. Give the movie a chance if you wanna laugh at how off it is, but if you're watching for pure enjoyment, I'd probably stay away.
When I saw the cast ensemble for the movie, I have to admit that I was initially somewhat intrigued and impressed. I mean, with the likes of Stephen Dorff, Heather Graham, Nicolas Cage, Tzi Ma, Eric Mabius and Costas Mandylor on the cast list, then you would assume that you would be in for something enjoyable.
But I have to say that writer and director Brian Skiba definitely proved me wrong with "Gunslingers". The storyline in the movie was flaccid, and there just wasn't a whole lot of entertainment value in the movie. I have to say that I sort of zoned out about half way through, and the movie just because something that played mostly in the background.
Even with a cast ensemble that included some good talents and names, the movie failed. Sure, the acting performances were, for the most parts, actually fair, then the movie just proved to be less than mediocre. And not even the sheer amount of gunfights did much to make up for the shortcomings.
Maybe diehard Western fans will be getting a much bigger kick out of watching "Gunslingers" than I did as a casual viewer.
The CGI animated rain was just cringeworthy to look at. But at least it provided a moment of good laughing.
This is not a movie that I will return to watch a second time.
My rating of writer and director Brian Skiba's 2025 movie "Gunslingers" lands on a generous three out of ten stars.
But I have to say that writer and director Brian Skiba definitely proved me wrong with "Gunslingers". The storyline in the movie was flaccid, and there just wasn't a whole lot of entertainment value in the movie. I have to say that I sort of zoned out about half way through, and the movie just because something that played mostly in the background.
Even with a cast ensemble that included some good talents and names, the movie failed. Sure, the acting performances were, for the most parts, actually fair, then the movie just proved to be less than mediocre. And not even the sheer amount of gunfights did much to make up for the shortcomings.
Maybe diehard Western fans will be getting a much bigger kick out of watching "Gunslingers" than I did as a casual viewer.
The CGI animated rain was just cringeworthy to look at. But at least it provided a moment of good laughing.
This is not a movie that I will return to watch a second time.
My rating of writer and director Brian Skiba's 2025 movie "Gunslingers" lands on a generous three out of ten stars.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe town of "Redemption" was shot at the now defunct Guntown Mountain. A Wild West theme park in Cave City, Ky, down the road from Mammoth Cave National Park. Open field scenes shot at Jesse James Riding Stables/Mammoth Valley Park.
- Erros de gravaçãoIncendiary revolver rounds didn't exist in 1905.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 44 min(104 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente