Avaliações de usuários

A case where 2 female roommates were sharing hair conditioner. One thought the other one was using too much. The angry roommate put depilatory in the conditioner. Judge Perez brushed it off as not being dangerous. The stuff is toxic! The plaintiff could of been injured. Makes you wonder about these tv judges. Perez seemed to be purposely agitating the hyper plaintiff to egg her on.

You have the nerve to try and downgrade a father who had been trying to better himself and his son & their relationship. You couldn't clearly see that the grandmother in this case (Trey's mother's, mother) was a sabotage and obviously a control freak in this situation? Henry Gibson (the father) tried to make up for past mistakes and step up to the plate to better his bond with his son by giving him a car that he purchased for him (2000 Nissan Maxima) for you to in turn ask him if he had it taken to a mechanic to be checked out or had he had anyone look over the car or how was he sure that the car was ok to drive? HE GAVE HIS 16 YEAR OLD SON A VEHICLE!! Do you know how many children miss out on that benefit? Sometimes people (especially trying fathers) need credit for things that they do rather than being overlooked or unnoticed. I may have struck out while up to bat last inning but I can assure you that, that does not and will not determine wether or not I get a base hit or a home run/grand slam my next at bat. You need to learn how to be "neutral" and stop being an early conclusion FAKE.

Mr. Henry Gibson, Props to you sir for trying to do something for your son no matter what your past may be as some children never know what its like to ever have their father do anything for them at any point within their life. You were not treated right on that show and I will stand up for you any day of the week, hope the best for you and your son!

Sincerely, Kyler S. Key

T. H.,IN.

I love court shows BUT her judgement is way off from common sense and the law lol extreme Akeem's judgements made more sense. Anytime it seems like an open and shut obvious case and " oh the plaintiff is out of their mind " she makes the worst and most ridiculous rulings ever. Oh, and her bailiff was literally convicted of murdering his wife lol I don't know why this shows even allowed to air in syndication anymore when others have been cancelled for so much less. Literally any other judge program ( Judy, Mathis, People's Court, heck even Judge Jerry, the Jerry Springer hosted court show ) is better and more fair. Skip it and watch something else.

I have been watching this show lately because it's on my regular TV at 11:00 a.m. As I watch it I realized this judge really does not know what she's doing sometimes. There is proof and witness right in the room on this case for the plaintiff's bike in the defendant has no proof or evidence and she went with the defendant. I don't understand some of her ruling she is not fair sometimes I don't agree with a lot of her rulings or how she thinks compared to other judge shows that I love this one is by far the worst. Just want to yell into the TV so she can hear me and tell her she's wrong LOL....and now reading everyone else's reviews I have to totally agree with everyone of them. The judge is very smart and sees things a lot differently which we all do in this life. But I am glad I am not the only one who thinks her rulings sometimes are outrageous and just not common sense or looked at how they should be and this is why we have jury's because one's personal opinions can way a case and ruin someone's life quickly and it's not true justice then when the evidence or witness are appearing and the case isn't seen all the way through...