AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,9/10
1,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Os irmãos Mark e Hank Hoagies se veem subitamente sem emprego quando a fábrica de cachorro-quente de Glantontown muda para a automação. Mas eles têm sorte, pois farão parte de um novo progra... Ler tudoOs irmãos Mark e Hank Hoagies se veem subitamente sem emprego quando a fábrica de cachorro-quente de Glantontown muda para a automação. Mas eles têm sorte, pois farão parte de um novo programa de Renda Básica Universal.Os irmãos Mark e Hank Hoagies se veem subitamente sem emprego quando a fábrica de cachorro-quente de Glantontown muda para a automação. Mas eles têm sorte, pois farão parte de um novo programa de Renda Básica Universal.
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
I came here to write a scathing review to criticize how awful this is from the previews.
But after watching episode 1, it's not actually as bad as I thought.
It's a good-paced show with decent shock humor and ironic gags.
The writing is severely lacking, however. Overall, it's pretty banal, bland, basic, and boring.
Biggest critique is Hank: the worst character that has been created in the history of characters being created. Seriously, what were the writers thinking? Haha, it's funny because he's dumb and talks in a slow, stupid voice? I have to skip through his scenes because they are too infuriating to suffer through.
All in all, a 5/10. Lots of potential. Let's see if it can be fulfilled.
But after watching episode 1, it's not actually as bad as I thought.
It's a good-paced show with decent shock humor and ironic gags.
The writing is severely lacking, however. Overall, it's pretty banal, bland, basic, and boring.
Biggest critique is Hank: the worst character that has been created in the history of characters being created. Seriously, what were the writers thinking? Haha, it's funny because he's dumb and talks in a slow, stupid voice? I have to skip through his scenes because they are too infuriating to suffer through.
All in all, a 5/10. Lots of potential. Let's see if it can be fulfilled.
I guess folks are missing the whole point to this dimwitted hilarious animated series about dimwitted folks who do really dimwitted things because they believe that their dimwittedness is their God given right to do what they desire, regardless of the mayhem they create and the harm to fellow humans - or even what professionals and academics folks say. So basically this is taking the Mickey out of dimwits who vote, drive cars, own guns and think they know everything (from unreliable sources) about everything. At least the makers of this series treat their dimwits with love and affection of dimwitted proportions...
This came out of nowhere and I immediately looked up who created it: I'm not a fan of Game of Zones at all. I love sports but I don't like GoZ at all. Despite being a hater I needed to watch the show (especially because Fred Armisen is in it). I have enjoyed every episode and probably enjoy each more than the last. It's a goofy, dumb comedy that definitely is an acquired taste. I have seen reviews talking about disturbing cartoon imagery, but I'd have to point to Family Guy who has done some pretty rough and unsavory things over the years as well (they're still there). Despite some unsavory imagery, there is certain comedy in here and top notch comedy moments/critique on Americans. Those who don't like it for some political reasons should just not watch a show like this, which is fine. This is getting better every episode, and I look forward to what's to come.
I'm glad that this show caters to any specific audience. Perhaps this audience is even underserved. It does not cater to me and I enjoy so many genres and so many quirky, crazy, and normal shows. The problem is that before this there was Futurama and The Simpsons and Family Guy and Bob's Burgers. This is definitely not that. From what I can tell this show is trying to write stories that serve the lowest common denominator and written for to an underserved audience, those who are recovering from anesthesia or have undergone a mental trauma. I always have respect for a show that stays true to what it's trying to do and it's trying to be stupid... It achieves that. Animation and voice acting are good though.
I see that the series is already getting a good amount of hate and I can see why. The art style is unappealing and the jokes can be lackluster. However, there are moments that did give me chuckles and there is some emotion I felt when watching the first two episodes, so, I can tell there's good intentions. The problem is that the series is really dull most of the time and can feel rather boring. At least Krapopolis gets me more hyper active as that show had more going on, and even modern Simpsons is doing a lot with experimentation, so at least I feel something with it. UBG is just mostly restricted and playing it safe, the unappealing art style is not helping either. Being safe doesn't mean it's bad automatically though, as I stated there are still some good jokes. Plus, I can sympathize with some of the characters with their struggles. Do I recommend it though, no, as I stated it's mostly safe and doesn't have much going for it, but if you wanna have a quick laugh while looking into some characters going about their struggles, this might be the show for you.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoMark is regularly depicted buying ridiculous expensive luxury items, such as buying a sex doll to use as a crash test dummy which he reveals was $6,000. His income as revealed in the concept and theme song is only $3,000 per month, as in the doll was two entire month's income, which only works if he bought absolutely nothing for two straight months. Mark receives nowhere near enough money to be able to buy all of the expensive things he does as easily as he does. (It's clear that Tammy doesn't support or know about these shenanigans until revealed to her, and all of her income would generally go towards actual legitimate expenses). An occasional big expense would be believable, but this is every episode.
- Citações
Mark Hoagies: Dammit, Hank!
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente