Undeva la Palilula

It's a brilliant movie, a mixture of dark comedy and absurd theater, full of symbols and depicting a fallen universe. Somehow a Paradise in the communist inferno. Strange, with passages from dream to reality and back to dream, with antiheroes busy only to enjoy whatever can be enjoyed from life in a forgotten place of the world (forgotten by people and by history as well). It's a movie similar to a play, with good actors, fantastic images and a very strongly underlined humor. But, as for the pediatrist who comes here for few weeks and stay for life, it manages to keep the public there, during 140 minutes. It reminded me a bit of Emil Kusturitza, by its strong Balkan flavor.

a film who preserves each line of director theatrical experience. grotesque, supra-realism, crumbs of kitsch, fragility of characters, strange balls of joy. result - an experience. because the images, the music and acting gives form to a large show of broken shadows and explosions of imagination. and it is not really a surprise. Romania is a door to Balkans. it can be , in fact, a brick of this zone. Romania is, in same measure, the motherland of Anton Pann, Tristan Tzara, Urmuz,Ion Barbu, Eugene Ionesco, Cioran and Caragiale ( Ion Luca and Mateiu ). this film reflects this fact. and the manner is seductive, naive and convincing. Palilula and doctor Seraphim as last its sign, the veil of myth and never ending leisure, the air of theater and the characters - shadows of spirits, the fall, each is piece of an universe who reflects the present of a country at middle of all temptations.

'Somewhere in Palilula' has managed to divide in camps not only film critics but also my friends who have seen it. Reactions ranged from enthusiastic acceptance till total rejection. In Romania it apparently had a fairly short career on screen and then disappeared to re-appear in festivals and at the Gopo Awards ceremony, where it received seven awards. With a little help from friends I managed to see the DVD version that was recently released and I formed an opinion of my own.

Having left Romania for almost 30 years I have not had the opportunity to see anything directed by Silviu Purcarete on stage during this time and I had to settle with two operas directed by him at famous house operas. I know that he is one of the major Romanian theater directors of today, and I know that he has created a world of his own with imagery, colors, characters and multiple dimensions. Somewhere in Palilula is his first film and his invented world extends from stage to screen with the tools and means of expression of cinema.

Of course, the greatest danger of such an artistic enterprise is 'theatricality'. It is however a danger only to the extent that the edge of the stage is visible in the movie, and the film misses the relationship between what is taking place on screen and cinema viewers. Theater drives its magic out of the intimacy of the relationship between actor and spectator, the ineffable and imperfect timing, the air and dust that spectators and actors breathe together. Those cannot be reproduced in film, where the viewer must be charmed by the impossible and the ideal created for him on screen. To a great extent Purcarete manages to create the magnetism that makes film viewers to watch fascinated what is happening on the big screen and forget that the media has only two dimensions (even in 3-D the third dimension is an illusion created by special spectacles!).

Purcarete invented almost none of these. Theater (or circus) is the world at Fellini, a universe in a studio theater was already created by Charlie Kaufman in 'Synechdoche, New York' and the beginning of the film with the locomotive in snow entering something that resembles another dimension reminded me of the first episode of Harry Potter. But the principal inspiration is my opinion the genial Romanian playwright I.L. Caragiale, the mentor of all creators who dare to describe the Romanian universe with the weapons of humor. We can find in this movie dozens, maybe hundreds of replicas of those that are remembered later as worth an 'anthology ' - but beyond the immediate laughs which are not missing, these are the materials of which the world of Purcarete is build of.

I loved the film, the visual experience and the way Purcarete made ​​me live for almost two hours and a half in his world. Trying to understand the reasons many did not like the movie, besides the banal 'de gustibus ... ' I guess that some of them could easily fall into the pitfalls of trying to understand what they see on the screen only through the historical context or may have attempted to immediately interpret all visual metaphors or ideas. Careful watching of the introduction, however, should deter somebody walking these tracks. The story of a young physician assigned to the countryside is perhaps inspired by the memoirs of a real person (one may remembers that Chekhov and Bulgakov were also countryside physicians) or all of real characters who lived similar experiences during communism, but the manner the main character is intr0duced, the landscape of the village that seems linked by uncertain roads to the world around, and the introduction of the other characters indicate clearly that this is a different reality - one that was absorbed by the writer director, decanted and recreated as reality into another dimension, with other colors and other tools than those of realistic image playback. There are many interesting and expressive metaphors, but one must avoid excessive interpretation in order to not spoil the viewing pleasure. A film like ' Somewhere in Palilula ' is the reflection of reality of a painful past and a huge metaphor containing in it a lot of other intelligent and meaningful metaphors, but before anything else it is an invitation to come and live for the duration of the screening in the world created by Silviu Purcarete.

I can not conclude without saying a few words about the special effects, set design and costumes that reach a level in my opinion unique so far in Romanian cinema. It was a movie that solicited to the extreme the team of actors, each of them managing to create expressive and colorful characters that take their place and become part of the universe created by the director. I will mention only that Aron Dimeny has the physiognomy and expressiveness fit to the lead role, and George Mihaita who at his peak performed here a remarkable role at the other pole than another big film role in the history of Romanian cinema - 'Reconstitution' of Lucian Pintilie . Lucian Pintilie is the co-producer on Somewhere in Palilula. Which closes another circle .

The film reveals the limits of a director used to do theater. Mentioning that I known doctor Serafim which was a very complex upper society person, the perspective is grotesque and horrible. The quality of the scenes, the lights,the colors, the sound and so on are no good than for a low budget theater representation caught on tape. The film is horrible and is no surprise that was immediately rejected by the public, despite the prices received from the "critics". These East European extremely low budget movies promoted by improvised directors should have at least some attraction points but in "Somewhere in Palilula" there is not the case... The film really sucks. Two hours of my life, I'll never be able to take back.

Did you liked A clockwork Orange? Do you love Michael Haneke movies? Do you like supra-realism and a theatrical form of movies? Oh well, this movie delivers this in a great form, good acting, excellent art directing and a little spoon of grotesque with a pinch of dark humor, oh, and the music is great as well.

The movie as a whole does not make much sense, but who cares? every piece of it surprises you, everything is different.

I really don't want to spoil anything from the movie, go out and see it, its worth it.

9/10