AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,4/10
25 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA deformed hunchback kidnaps a bride and holds her hostage while his connection to her and his targets is revealed in a series of flashbacks that unfold as he starts seeking revenge.A deformed hunchback kidnaps a bride and holds her hostage while his connection to her and his targets is revealed in a series of flashbacks that unfold as he starts seeking revenge.A deformed hunchback kidnaps a bride and holds her hostage while his connection to her and his targets is revealed in a series of flashbacks that unfold as he starts seeking revenge.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 8 vitórias e 9 indicações no total
Ramkumar Ganesan
- Indrakumar
- (as G. Ramkumar)
Mohan Kapur
- Ad Director
- (as Mohan Kapoor)
R. Sarathkumar
- Self
- (as Sarath Kumar)
Avaliações em destaque
👍'I' Review- watched it with very high expectations but film disappointed me.expected something unexpected from Shankar like Robot but movie was not up to the mark.long runtime of 3 hrs 8 min made it boring.all the visual effects shown in the trailer were only in 1 song,no more effects in film.Vikram was awesome in his role and he made the movie little bit more watchable.Amy Jackson was superb.other actors were good.the only MSG from the movie is that Ugliness cant stop the true love thats it,nothing much.its only and only 1 time watch that too for Vikram.this happens rarely that a lead actor stealing the show instead of director like Shankar.
The film is worth the 3 years wait. If this movie can be compared to a painting, Vikram is the paper, paint and brush with which Shankar has drawn this picture.
P.C.Sreeram and A.R.R have done a great job but it is one and only Vikram who stands as the man of the movie, he has given all his to give life to Shankar's storyline.
The story does seem predictable at times but still makes the audience thrilled with its grandeur and extravagant visuals. Picture perfect movie with a perfect acting by Vikram
Amy Jackson has done a pretty fair job compared against the young bunch of leading ladies in Tamil film industry.
Santhanam's one liners makes the audience burst into laughs every time he appears on screen.
9/10 for movie but 10/10 for Vikram's acting
P.C.Sreeram and A.R.R have done a great job but it is one and only Vikram who stands as the man of the movie, he has given all his to give life to Shankar's storyline.
The story does seem predictable at times but still makes the audience thrilled with its grandeur and extravagant visuals. Picture perfect movie with a perfect acting by Vikram
Amy Jackson has done a pretty fair job compared against the young bunch of leading ladies in Tamil film industry.
Santhanam's one liners makes the audience burst into laughs every time he appears on screen.
9/10 for movie but 10/10 for Vikram's acting
I don't want to reveal anything about the story, but the genre of this flick is most important for you to know before you enter the theatre. It's a Romantic Thriller with fantasy elements. Vikram is the show stealer. He's just out of the world. His action in each and every frame, will keep you all spellbound, especially the hunch-back characters' sequence. And the film, from the first frame till the last, runs on a very very clever screenplay, which I haven't seen in any of Shankar's previous flicks. The Cinematography is outstanding. And P C sir once again proved that he is the King of Cinematographers in India. No wonder why the film production cost so much,the art- work and the sets they solely put up for Songs would give you the answer! Splendid art direction. This films' OST will remain as career best for A R Rahman. Upen Patel was good. Santhanam was hilarious. Amy Jackson was good with her acting skills. She was literally an 'I' candy all through the film. The amount of 'A' rated content should have been controlled by Shanker sir. The length of the film and few scenes might seem lagging, but the crews' 3 years of hard work overpowers it. The best parts being the whole China sequences, Upen-Vikrams fight sequence and Hunchbacks' emotional scenes. This 'I' will remain as a unique film in Shankar's career, not many are made in such a way. Before you get in the theatre, do not have any expectations and watch the film with a lot of patience and I would assure you that you'd leave the theatre with a smile on your face and most likely, a bit teary-eyed as well. And for people with less patience, I would suggest them to avoid this flick.
"I" : How I felt Shanker's magnum opus I starring Vikram is huge, but doesn't reach the expected levels of hype.
I was obviously the most-awaited movie of the year, I was damn waiting for this flick since the teaser release months ago. The main elements of expectations were Shanker and Vikram, for the former's history of great flicks and the latter's talent and dedication. Rahman's music, P.C.Sreeram's frames everything was a matter of hype.... when I heard about Suresh Gopi's presence my level of expectations increased. Being a great movie lover, I was unable to resist myself from watching the movie the first day itself.
Now,coming to the experience of the magnum opus,
the story of the movie is told in two time lines, one is that of a hunchback man who kidnaps a supermodel from her wedding and the other, is his past with her. All together, the movie draws a sketch over the life of a gym master-turned- model, Ligeshwar aka Lee.
Initially, Director Shankar pushes the viewer into a forest of thrill called "I". As the viewer proceeds, he finds it interesting and wonderful, the visuals and colors mesmerizes the viewer, but, as the viewer reaches a stage of Shanker's magnum opus forest, the roads become clearer, it becomes no more a forest, the viewer one who is able to recollect one dialoge of the first stages, find the forest nothing but a projection of huge trees and a single beast called Vikram. Finally, when the movie ends, the viewer realizes that, the 'so called' troubling paths of forest were just usual roads and the forest is usual except for some visually appealing elements, action sequences and that heavy beast called Vikram.
Yes, what you have read is correct. Shanker fails to meet expectations. I do accept that "I" is a visual wonder and treat for eyes, one can easily go crazy for those action sequences and compelling background score. Shanker really requires applause for the heights of technical brilliance he has achieved, but only visuals can't appeal the viewer, there should be a solid script which makes the viewer engaging. Yes, he keeps us engaged, takes to some level of expectation and what he delivered in pen-ultimate sequences is inside the circle of imagination, anyone could easily predict the movie as it precedes further. Had there was something which is out of the box, "I" would have been a mile-stone. It may satisfy a viewer who has normal expectations, but I am not satisfied to the core. But certain elements made "I" enterprising. The supreme of them is the jaw-dropping performance of Vikram. What an actor man...!!! How can a person expose so much dedication and hard work...! Had he committed a slight mistake, I would have been an epic failure, but he makes it stand. His transformation of characters require special applause, from start to end, it is Vikram show. 'Lee' was so effective only due to his versatility in acting and perfection in body language. The next factor is Shanker's making. Even though the scripting failed, his making was awesome. Each frame had novelty. Presented the average script in an engaging manner. Took the visuals to another level of experience. Next is undoubtedly, the maestro's music, AR Rahman's music was of top class, offered life to the movie. That BGM of main villain was terrific PC Sreeram's frames offered treat to eyes. Colouring effects were wonderful. Certain shots had an international outlook. ANL Arasu's action sequences were of great excellence, had a world class touch in it. Weta-Workshop made the make up works look damn realistic. Kudos to their work. A mixture of all these fore told elements offered a visual wonder but script still remained average.
Coming to the performances of others, Amy Jackson had a role of good importance unlike the hero-oriented flicks of these days. She was beautiful and sexy...filled the space of beauty quotient. Did her part well. Remarkable performance was from Suresh Gopi, did his job with utmost perfection. Upen Patel's negative role was impressive, where, Santhanam took charge over the comedy track. The other characters too did their part well.
Art direction too requires applause, that advertisement song (Aila Aila) was creativity brilliant and Beast song (Ennod Nee Irunthaal) had great visual excellence.
The movie had a brilliant technical crew, which require special applause for the visual experience.
Mind blowing Vikram, Stylish Making, Top Class Action sequences and wonderful visuals, altogether makes "I" huge,which makes the viewer engaging but lags behind only due to not-that- compelling script.
Kudos to Vikram again....you are a great actor....really great :)
My Rating: 7/10 Go for it, Vikram's performance is enough to make your money worth.
_Sooraj Pattazy
I was obviously the most-awaited movie of the year, I was damn waiting for this flick since the teaser release months ago. The main elements of expectations were Shanker and Vikram, for the former's history of great flicks and the latter's talent and dedication. Rahman's music, P.C.Sreeram's frames everything was a matter of hype.... when I heard about Suresh Gopi's presence my level of expectations increased. Being a great movie lover, I was unable to resist myself from watching the movie the first day itself.
Now,coming to the experience of the magnum opus,
the story of the movie is told in two time lines, one is that of a hunchback man who kidnaps a supermodel from her wedding and the other, is his past with her. All together, the movie draws a sketch over the life of a gym master-turned- model, Ligeshwar aka Lee.
Initially, Director Shankar pushes the viewer into a forest of thrill called "I". As the viewer proceeds, he finds it interesting and wonderful, the visuals and colors mesmerizes the viewer, but, as the viewer reaches a stage of Shanker's magnum opus forest, the roads become clearer, it becomes no more a forest, the viewer one who is able to recollect one dialoge of the first stages, find the forest nothing but a projection of huge trees and a single beast called Vikram. Finally, when the movie ends, the viewer realizes that, the 'so called' troubling paths of forest were just usual roads and the forest is usual except for some visually appealing elements, action sequences and that heavy beast called Vikram.
Yes, what you have read is correct. Shanker fails to meet expectations. I do accept that "I" is a visual wonder and treat for eyes, one can easily go crazy for those action sequences and compelling background score. Shanker really requires applause for the heights of technical brilliance he has achieved, but only visuals can't appeal the viewer, there should be a solid script which makes the viewer engaging. Yes, he keeps us engaged, takes to some level of expectation and what he delivered in pen-ultimate sequences is inside the circle of imagination, anyone could easily predict the movie as it precedes further. Had there was something which is out of the box, "I" would have been a mile-stone. It may satisfy a viewer who has normal expectations, but I am not satisfied to the core. But certain elements made "I" enterprising. The supreme of them is the jaw-dropping performance of Vikram. What an actor man...!!! How can a person expose so much dedication and hard work...! Had he committed a slight mistake, I would have been an epic failure, but he makes it stand. His transformation of characters require special applause, from start to end, it is Vikram show. 'Lee' was so effective only due to his versatility in acting and perfection in body language. The next factor is Shanker's making. Even though the scripting failed, his making was awesome. Each frame had novelty. Presented the average script in an engaging manner. Took the visuals to another level of experience. Next is undoubtedly, the maestro's music, AR Rahman's music was of top class, offered life to the movie. That BGM of main villain was terrific PC Sreeram's frames offered treat to eyes. Colouring effects were wonderful. Certain shots had an international outlook. ANL Arasu's action sequences were of great excellence, had a world class touch in it. Weta-Workshop made the make up works look damn realistic. Kudos to their work. A mixture of all these fore told elements offered a visual wonder but script still remained average.
Coming to the performances of others, Amy Jackson had a role of good importance unlike the hero-oriented flicks of these days. She was beautiful and sexy...filled the space of beauty quotient. Did her part well. Remarkable performance was from Suresh Gopi, did his job with utmost perfection. Upen Patel's negative role was impressive, where, Santhanam took charge over the comedy track. The other characters too did their part well.
Art direction too requires applause, that advertisement song (Aila Aila) was creativity brilliant and Beast song (Ennod Nee Irunthaal) had great visual excellence.
The movie had a brilliant technical crew, which require special applause for the visual experience.
Mind blowing Vikram, Stylish Making, Top Class Action sequences and wonderful visuals, altogether makes "I" huge,which makes the viewer engaging but lags behind only due to not-that- compelling script.
Kudos to Vikram again....you are a great actor....really great :)
My Rating: 7/10 Go for it, Vikram's performance is enough to make your money worth.
_Sooraj Pattazy
I movie comes with Romantic Thriller action movie
Director Shankar comes love story with revenge based one. Colorful picturization & cinematography graphics.
Screenplay comes with Vikram bodybuilder whose only goal in life is become Mr. India and how his life change path to model / love with Amy/ hunchback character.
Chiyaan Vikram proved nobody can match him when comes to performance. Redefines acting and dedication for role. Hats off to his acting . Hunchback role was really touching
Amy is at her hottest best. Perfect choice for the role.. Really did well performance.. Superb.. Movie moves around her only.
Santhanam Comedy rocks simply first half and last part of movie
Suresh Gopi did simply good with positive / negative character.
Ramkumar Ganesan (Actor Prabhu bro), debut in this movie.. Comes as a business man, nice attempt.
Upen Patel also did well.
Ojas M. Rajani role was nice..
Power star just a guest role - Just value add
Cinematography P. C. Sreeram was really visual treat.. Sema... (shots in China was Good)
Edited by Llewellyn Anthony Gonsalves was good..
Brilliant fights too..
Music by A.R was simply superb....("Mersalaayitten" - Awesome one and "Ennodu Nee Irundhaal" ).. BGM was Good..
Plus:
Vikram Acting (Hunchback role - Awesome)
Shankar Screen play
AR Music
Amy performance
Santhanam Comedy
Cinematography
Minus:
In between First half will feel slow / bore ( for 15 min)
Shall be Value added in story.
Some may feel Movie lengthy.
Verdict : Don't Miss the movie. Should see for Hunchback role.
'I' saw the movie U don't miss the 'I'.
Score : 4.25 /5
Director Shankar comes love story with revenge based one. Colorful picturization & cinematography graphics.
Screenplay comes with Vikram bodybuilder whose only goal in life is become Mr. India and how his life change path to model / love with Amy/ hunchback character.
Chiyaan Vikram proved nobody can match him when comes to performance. Redefines acting and dedication for role. Hats off to his acting . Hunchback role was really touching
Amy is at her hottest best. Perfect choice for the role.. Really did well performance.. Superb.. Movie moves around her only.
Santhanam Comedy rocks simply first half and last part of movie
Suresh Gopi did simply good with positive / negative character.
Ramkumar Ganesan (Actor Prabhu bro), debut in this movie.. Comes as a business man, nice attempt.
Upen Patel also did well.
Ojas M. Rajani role was nice..
Power star just a guest role - Just value add
Cinematography P. C. Sreeram was really visual treat.. Sema... (shots in China was Good)
Edited by Llewellyn Anthony Gonsalves was good..
Brilliant fights too..
Music by A.R was simply superb....("Mersalaayitten" - Awesome one and "Ennodu Nee Irundhaal" ).. BGM was Good..
Plus:
Vikram Acting (Hunchback role - Awesome)
Shankar Screen play
AR Music
Amy performance
Santhanam Comedy
Cinematography
Minus:
In between First half will feel slow / bore ( for 15 min)
Shall be Value added in story.
Some may feel Movie lengthy.
Verdict : Don't Miss the movie. Should see for Hunchback role.
'I' saw the movie U don't miss the 'I'.
Score : 4.25 /5
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesFor a character Vikram had to go through a makeup session of 5 to 7 hours daily.
- Citações
'Pattinapakkam' Ravi: Will you kill me?
Lingesan: Worse than that!
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe track Ennodu Nee Irundhal (Reprise version) was played in the background during the end credits and the screen showed a positive climax of the movie.
- Versões alternativasThe UK release was cut, the distributor chose to remove moments of strong violence in order to obtain a 12A classification. An uncut 15 classification was available.
- Trilhas sonorasMersalaayitten (Tamil)
Music by A.R. Rahman
Lyrics by Kabilan
Performed by Anirudh Ravichander, Neeti Mohan
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is I?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 12.500.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 1.449.232
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 771.312
- 18 de jan. de 2015
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 3.200.113
- Tempo de duração
- 3 h 8 min(188 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39: 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente