Mark Antony
- 2023
- 2 h 30 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,6/10
6,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaMark, the son of gangster Antony, finds a telephone that has the ability to contact the past.Mark, the son of gangster Antony, finds a telephone that has the ability to contact the past.Mark, the son of gangster Antony, finds a telephone that has the ability to contact the past.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 1 indicação no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Vishal very dull acting after his entry was a letdown and thought the movie is gonna be so bad but SJ Suryah performance peaked at pre-interval to 2nd half pre climax, just wow. People do say overreacting but that's his talent and it was good. Those 7 marks are for SJ Suryah comedy and acting and Vishal acting in climax. Adik. Ajith references were unwanted from Adik Ravichandaran. His other movies are not good as this. Songs were not good but retro remix from GVP worked out. Comeback for Vishal and the director. The story was very similiar as INN but the concept of Time Travel was different. We need more unique scripts like this! 2nd half screenplay >> 1st half screenplay.
My man SJ Surya is out here carrying movies on his back. We had the just good Maanaadu elevated by his sheer tour de force as Dhanushkodi, and now Mark Antony. It's a shame as he wastes his best performance on such a terrible film.
My main gripe with the film was not its cartoonish plotting, irritating lead actor, but them using a LITERAL DEAD PERSON as sex appeal for the audience.
That didnt rub well at all, and it's a testament to how weird our society is that people praise it as the best part of the film.
I could go on about how brilliant SJ Surya is, and he did make me laugh boisterously out loud, despite how terrible the film is.
If you remove him, it's a solid 2/10, but his performance is just way too good.
My main gripe with the film was not its cartoonish plotting, irritating lead actor, but them using a LITERAL DEAD PERSON as sex appeal for the audience.
That didnt rub well at all, and it's a testament to how weird our society is that people praise it as the best part of the film.
I could go on about how brilliant SJ Surya is, and he did make me laugh boisterously out loud, despite how terrible the film is.
If you remove him, it's a solid 2/10, but his performance is just way too good.
Watched this on day 1 release. Everyone who watched before me said this is a blockbuster. I went in with high hopes. Literally couldn't sit through the film. Except for SJ Surya and few good comedy, what does this film offer?
Vishal is poorly cast, he is no match to SJ surya. The story itself is very boring and said in an uninteresting way. The films songs and bgm are even bad. Very loud and jarring. The old songs used in the film are good.
And what's with the self references, like SJ surya mentions Vaali and Vishal with Anaconda. It's really irritating after some point. Poorly written screenplay that follows 0 logic. Even the timetravel concept is not properly shown.
Vishal is poorly cast, he is no match to SJ surya. The story itself is very boring and said in an uninteresting way. The films songs and bgm are even bad. Very loud and jarring. The old songs used in the film are good.
And what's with the self references, like SJ surya mentions Vaali and Vishal with Anaconda. It's really irritating after some point. Poorly written screenplay that follows 0 logic. Even the timetravel concept is not properly shown.
One of the best comedies I've seen in recent times. I was laughing throughout the movie. Using science fiction elements they've turned a usual Tamil gangster story into a spoof of all the familiar tropes without losing the cool action that comes with it. There are definitely plot holes and logic issues with the time-traveling phone but the movie doesn't give you much time to think about it because it just wants to be an out-and-out entertainer more than anything.
SJ Surya is the MVP here. Even though Vishal also did pretty great with his dual roles, SJ Surya's double role as father and son carried the movie. Anyone else would have ruined the whole movie. He deserves all the praise for making all the craziness of the movie work.
SJ Surya is the MVP here. Even though Vishal also did pretty great with his dual roles, SJ Surya's double role as father and son carried the movie. Anyone else would have ruined the whole movie. He deserves all the praise for making all the craziness of the movie work.
RATED 6/10
Language: Tamil
Media Partner: Amazon Prime
Source: Nil
Director thought, if you put old hits as background you can do any illogical and madness in the screen. Silk scene sequence also similar to that one.
SJ Surya is ultimate in this venture and he saved the whole movie single handedly. Whenever he appears in the screen, it was like fire cracker. All other scenes are so dud and sometimes not bearable too.
The story is OK, the fantasy angle helped lot in movie flow and comic angle. Vishal with that beard and wig, it is total unfit. Especially his climax mannerisms are irritating to the core.
My advice would be, wait for OTT release, so that you will have control in your hand to forward and skip as much as possible.
Director thought, if you put old hits as background you can do any illogical and madness in the screen. Silk scene sequence also similar to that one.
SJ Surya is ultimate in this venture and he saved the whole movie single handedly. Whenever he appears in the screen, it was like fire cracker. All other scenes are so dud and sometimes not bearable too.
The story is OK, the fantasy angle helped lot in movie flow and comic angle. Vishal with that beard and wig, it is total unfit. Especially his climax mannerisms are irritating to the core.
My advice would be, wait for OTT release, so that you will have control in your hand to forward and skip as much as possible.
Você sabia?
- Citações
Mark Antony: What's bad in good? What's good in bad?
- Versões alternativasThe UK release was cut, the distributor chose to make cuts to violence in order to obtain a 12A classification. An uncut 15 classification was available.
- ConexõesReferences Amaravathi (1993)
- Trilhas sonorasAdhirudha
Asal Kolaar
T.Rajendar
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Mark Antony?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 95.956
- Tempo de duração2 horas 30 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente