AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,3/10
3,5 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Boudica governa o povo Iceniano com seu marido, Prasutagus. O rei morre nas mãos de soldados romanos, deixando o reino de Boudica sem um herdeiro do sexo masculino, e os romanos se apoderam ... Ler tudoBoudica governa o povo Iceniano com seu marido, Prasutagus. O rei morre nas mãos de soldados romanos, deixando o reino de Boudica sem um herdeiro do sexo masculino, e os romanos se apoderam de suas terras e propriedades.Boudica governa o povo Iceniano com seu marido, Prasutagus. O rei morre nas mãos de soldados romanos, deixando o reino de Boudica sem um herdeiro do sexo masculino, e os romanos se apoderam de suas terras e propriedades.
Avaliações em destaque
Not sure even where to start with this one. The script has to be one of the worst ones ever written. Why even bother to make a "historical" movie if you are going to pepper it with modern speech.
It is cringingly bad in this respect.
Boudica spent most of her time looking like a hippy art teacher complete with smock.
Obviously shot on a low budget, they tried to make 9 or 10 Romans look like 80. Lots of gore, the action wasn't bad at first but soon became very repetitive as Boudica took on the elite Roman centurions one at a time and dispatched them with ease.
And apparently Boudica or Boedicia took advice from her dead daughters. Of course !
Please stop making such terrible films about actual interesting historical figures.
It is cringingly bad in this respect.
Boudica spent most of her time looking like a hippy art teacher complete with smock.
Obviously shot on a low budget, they tried to make 9 or 10 Romans look like 80. Lots of gore, the action wasn't bad at first but soon became very repetitive as Boudica took on the elite Roman centurions one at a time and dispatched them with ease.
And apparently Boudica or Boedicia took advice from her dead daughters. Of course !
Please stop making such terrible films about actual interesting historical figures.
Absolutely awful to the point that it approached the level of a comedic parody. It has damaged Kurylenko's career and probably neutered other hopefuls in the rather thin cast. I suppose some of the fault could be assigned to what was likely a very low budget. It looked like a school play really or a production on the stage at a renaissance faire.
The costumes and scene design were cheap, unimaginative and not even close to authentic. They looked like the costume design team had gone down to Jo Annes Fabrics at their local strip mall and dug around in the discount bin.
The editing only made the wooden acting and the strange script more awkward. This is a career killing film and laughably bad. 2 out of 5 stars!
The costumes and scene design were cheap, unimaginative and not even close to authentic. They looked like the costume design team had gone down to Jo Annes Fabrics at their local strip mall and dug around in the discount bin.
The editing only made the wooden acting and the strange script more awkward. This is a career killing film and laughably bad. 2 out of 5 stars!
Where to begin?
The acting is embarrassingly bad. The casting is embarrassingly bad since this is a historical drama... But I can't say exactly how and why without risking being banned and doxxed and deprived of life, love, liberty, and income, because that's the right way to run a civilization, for sure™.
The movie wasn't a total waste. I did find it hilarious how the brass sword magically healed and floated through space and made that ridiculous ringing sound. No, seriously, my sides hurt from those scenes, and in all sincerity, I thank you.
As far as the rest of the movie, it's about as faithful a reference to historical events as you should expect if your I. Q. is above around 95. Meaning, it's total garbage.
And now, I'm tired of typing.
The acting is embarrassingly bad. The casting is embarrassingly bad since this is a historical drama... But I can't say exactly how and why without risking being banned and doxxed and deprived of life, love, liberty, and income, because that's the right way to run a civilization, for sure™.
The movie wasn't a total waste. I did find it hilarious how the brass sword magically healed and floated through space and made that ridiculous ringing sound. No, seriously, my sides hurt from those scenes, and in all sincerity, I thank you.
As far as the rest of the movie, it's about as faithful a reference to historical events as you should expect if your I. Q. is above around 95. Meaning, it's total garbage.
And now, I'm tired of typing.
The real story of Boudica is inspirational. This movie makes a mockery of that. First, instead of showing a woman who is successful through her own force of will, intelligence, and courage, this movie injects magic as the cause. (Is this male chauvinism?) Second, I'm a guy who likes some violence on screen, but this level of blood letting is absurd and gratuitous. There are never-ending screen shots of swords through eye sockets, beheadings, and decapitated skulls being bandied about. The dialogue is stilted. The acting is forced.
I'm so very disappointed as I've wanted to see her story on screen for many years. Don't waste your time on this. JPL.
I'm so very disappointed as I've wanted to see her story on screen for many years. Don't waste your time on this. JPL.
Boudica: Queen of War (2023) is a historical film directed by Jesse V. Johnson and starring Olga Kurylenko as Boudica, the legendary Celtic warrior queen who led a rebellion against the Roman occupation of Britain in the first century AD. While the film has some potential, it ultimately falls short due to its uninspired direction, underwhelming action sequences, and a lack of historical accuracy.
One of the film's biggest problems is its direction. Johnson's lack of experience with large-scale action films is evident in the film's battle scenes, which are poorly choreographed and lack any sense of scale. The film's budget is also clearly limited, as evidenced by the use of cheap-looking sets and costumes.
Kurylenko is a talented actress, but she is not given enough to work with in this role. Her Boudica is a one-dimensional character who is defined by her anger and rage. The film does not explore her motivations in any depth, and her character arc is predictable and uninspired.
The film's historical accuracy is also questionable. The film takes liberties with the historical record, and there are several scenes that are simply not plausible. For example, the film depicts Boudica as having a magical sword that can fly through the air. This is a complete fabrication, and there is no evidence to support it.
Overall, Boudica: Queen of War (2023) is a disappointing attempt to bring the story of Boudica to life. The film is poorly directed, lacks scale, and is historically inaccurate. It is a missed opportunity to tell a truly epic story about one of history's most fascinating women.
One of the film's biggest problems is its direction. Johnson's lack of experience with large-scale action films is evident in the film's battle scenes, which are poorly choreographed and lack any sense of scale. The film's budget is also clearly limited, as evidenced by the use of cheap-looking sets and costumes.
Kurylenko is a talented actress, but she is not given enough to work with in this role. Her Boudica is a one-dimensional character who is defined by her anger and rage. The film does not explore her motivations in any depth, and her character arc is predictable and uninspired.
The film's historical accuracy is also questionable. The film takes liberties with the historical record, and there are several scenes that are simply not plausible. For example, the film depicts Boudica as having a magical sword that can fly through the air. This is a complete fabrication, and there is no evidence to support it.
Overall, Boudica: Queen of War (2023) is a disappointing attempt to bring the story of Boudica to life. The film is poorly directed, lacks scale, and is historically inaccurate. It is a missed opportunity to tell a truly epic story about one of history's most fascinating women.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesAfter Centurião (2010), this is the second time that Olga Kurylenko (Boudica) has played a British Celtic warrior who is fighting the Roman occupation.
- Erros de gravaçãoWolfgar shows a Roman legion banner, with an elephant. Actually, in the era, the only legion who has an elephant as emblem was legion V Alaudae, stationed in Germany. The legions involved in Boudican revolt were XIV Gemina (emblem Capricorn) and XX Valeria Victrix (emblem boar).
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Boudica: Queen of War?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Boudica: Queen of War
- Locações de filme
- Hadleigh, Essex, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(Ironage Roundhouse)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 65.119
- Tempo de duração1 hora 41 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente