Pandemonium
- 2023
- 1 h 35 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,2/10
1,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Depois de perceber que morreu no local de um acidente de carro, Nathan desce às profundezas do inferno, onde está condenado a experimentar a dor de almas torturadas ao longo do caminho.Depois de perceber que morreu no local de um acidente de carro, Nathan desce às profundezas do inferno, onde está condenado a experimentar a dor de almas torturadas ao longo do caminho.Depois de perceber que morreu no local de um acidente de carro, Nathan desce às profundezas do inferno, onde está condenado a experimentar a dor de almas torturadas ao longo do caminho.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Avaliações em destaque
I'm not usually one to write reviews, but I felt like I had to for this movie. The script was really well done from start to finish. I wouldn't call it a horror movie because it had so many realistic elements; it felt more like a spiritual journey we hope never to experience ourselves. The music and sounds added a scary element to the whole movie. I had to rewatch a few scenes to get a clear picture of what was happening, and I didn't regret doing so. Even though the movie is French, it captivated me from beginning to end. It's definitely worth watching, and I'll leave it at that so you can be surprised too.
Pandemonium (2023, France), at face-value presents three ostensibly loose standing stories which all lead to almost everyone, fairly or unfairly, ending up in hell and going through a Dantesque process of suffering.
At this level the story engages questions around the moral values, if any, of those who "judge" humanity and as such the potential irrelevance of human existentialism.
There is also space for interpreting the film. An example of this flows mainly from the final aspect around the reincarnation of the Anti-Christ and the immediately preceding remarks around time being a human construct and not being linear. In each story we experience loss by the protagonist of family members in different ways, but there is always loss and there is always either direct or indirect guilt on the side of the protagonist. The argument for the stories thus dealing with reincarnation is not totally far-fetched and provides a solid thread to combine the stories into one larger story.
The cinematography was clearly influenced by writer and director Alexandre Claudin (Quarxx)'s artistic and atmospheric intent, inter alia demonstrated through the homage paid to various genres of horror films through the three stories.
The acting, especially by (at the time) ten year old Manon Maindevide, was top notch. The writing left obvious lacunae in the individual stories as well as the connecting story. Some might see this as a weakness in the film but it served an obvious purpose , both in relation to the main theme of existentialism / life-death-afterlife and the meaning (if any) thereof, as well as how the viewer gets his or her head around this theme, i.e. Through personal interpretation. Definitely a very unique film. 9/10.
At this level the story engages questions around the moral values, if any, of those who "judge" humanity and as such the potential irrelevance of human existentialism.
There is also space for interpreting the film. An example of this flows mainly from the final aspect around the reincarnation of the Anti-Christ and the immediately preceding remarks around time being a human construct and not being linear. In each story we experience loss by the protagonist of family members in different ways, but there is always loss and there is always either direct or indirect guilt on the side of the protagonist. The argument for the stories thus dealing with reincarnation is not totally far-fetched and provides a solid thread to combine the stories into one larger story.
The cinematography was clearly influenced by writer and director Alexandre Claudin (Quarxx)'s artistic and atmospheric intent, inter alia demonstrated through the homage paid to various genres of horror films through the three stories.
The acting, especially by (at the time) ten year old Manon Maindevide, was top notch. The writing left obvious lacunae in the individual stories as well as the connecting story. Some might see this as a weakness in the film but it served an obvious purpose , both in relation to the main theme of existentialism / life-death-afterlife and the meaning (if any) thereof, as well as how the viewer gets his or her head around this theme, i.e. Through personal interpretation. Definitely a very unique film. 9/10.
I have to give the film credit for having a unique base setting to an anthology-based horror film.
There isn't much of a review here, since the film is flat and immensely mundane. It isn't terrible.
The CGI is kind of cheesy in the beginning, but nevertheless the demons and the films description of Hell are very "awesome" (for lack of better terminology).
Some of the stories are original, but are lacking in story depth, and they come off as mundane. I would categorize this film to be put into the supernatural horror genre, but that is just my opinion.
The stories themselves are not "scary" or "creepy/dark" as some may say but are intriguing in their own sort of way. On the contrary, the stories are quite boring.
I believe that the best aesthetic portions of the film are in the beginning and in "Hell." Otherwise, the film is rather mediocre.
I think it would be worth a one-time watch.
5/10.
There isn't much of a review here, since the film is flat and immensely mundane. It isn't terrible.
The CGI is kind of cheesy in the beginning, but nevertheless the demons and the films description of Hell are very "awesome" (for lack of better terminology).
Some of the stories are original, but are lacking in story depth, and they come off as mundane. I would categorize this film to be put into the supernatural horror genre, but that is just my opinion.
The stories themselves are not "scary" or "creepy/dark" as some may say but are intriguing in their own sort of way. On the contrary, the stories are quite boring.
I believe that the best aesthetic portions of the film are in the beginning and in "Hell." Otherwise, the film is rather mediocre.
I think it would be worth a one-time watch.
5/10.
Heaven and hell truly exist. You see a glimpse of the later one while watching this movie. And it's definitely the place where the writer/director will end up...
I rarely write reviews, but when having watched an extraordinary movies I make an exception every now and then. This is is such a time and the reason is clearly not positive. The movie earns its one star because of an idea of the afterlife it tries to present. But that's it. The resulting plot lacks a lot of logic (which the director tries to explain at first, but then gets weirder with every additional episode every passing minute). The missing visual effects (one CGI - I don't count the static doors in the landscape as such - and three latex face masks are not enough) and slow-acting actors with long-winding dialogues (and not describing anything despite it) give the movie the rest.
Maybe: if you watch it nevertheless, you could place this lost half and a hour of lifetime on your judgement day as good deed for self-abandonment...
Maybe: if you watch it nevertheless, you could place this lost half and a hour of lifetime on your judgement day as good deed for self-abandonment...
Needless to say that I had never actually heard about this 2023 horror movie titled "Pandemonium" prior to stumbling upon it by random chance here in 2024. In fact, I didn't even know that it was a French movie that I sat down to watch when I opted to sit down and watch it, on account of it being a horror movie that I hadn't already seen.
So in a sense, writer and director Quarxx had every opportunity to entertain and impress me here. However, that was a wasted opportunity, because "Pandemonium" was a dumpster fire of a movie. I didn't know that I was in for a horror anthology here, and had I known that this was an anthology I wouldn't have wasted 95 minutes on watching it.
The movie was off to a great start with the scene with Nathan (played by Hugo Dillon) and Daniel (played by Arben Bajraktaraj) with the crash and the choices of Heaven or Hell. But then the movie quickly went downhill. But give it a watch, perhaps you might find the segments and stories interesting. I just happened to not find the subsequent segments interesting, after the first one.
It should be said, though, that the acting performances in "Pandemonium" were good. I wasn't familiar with a single actor or actress on the cast list, however. But that is actually something I do appreciate and enjoy when I sit down to watch a movie. Just a shame that this was a dumpster fire of a horror anthology.
Visually then "Pandemonium" was okay. There were a minimal of special effects throughout the 95 minutes that the movie ran for. But the effects were adequate for what they were and served the movie well enough.
"Pandemonium" didn't impress me, much less actually entertained me. And it is not a movie that will ever grace my screen a second time.
My rating of writer and director Quarxx's 2023 horror movie "Pandemonium" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars.
So in a sense, writer and director Quarxx had every opportunity to entertain and impress me here. However, that was a wasted opportunity, because "Pandemonium" was a dumpster fire of a movie. I didn't know that I was in for a horror anthology here, and had I known that this was an anthology I wouldn't have wasted 95 minutes on watching it.
The movie was off to a great start with the scene with Nathan (played by Hugo Dillon) and Daniel (played by Arben Bajraktaraj) with the crash and the choices of Heaven or Hell. But then the movie quickly went downhill. But give it a watch, perhaps you might find the segments and stories interesting. I just happened to not find the subsequent segments interesting, after the first one.
It should be said, though, that the acting performances in "Pandemonium" were good. I wasn't familiar with a single actor or actress on the cast list, however. But that is actually something I do appreciate and enjoy when I sit down to watch a movie. Just a shame that this was a dumpster fire of a horror anthology.
Visually then "Pandemonium" was okay. There were a minimal of special effects throughout the 95 minutes that the movie ran for. But the effects were adequate for what they were and served the movie well enough.
"Pandemonium" didn't impress me, much less actually entertained me. And it is not a movie that will ever grace my screen a second time.
My rating of writer and director Quarxx's 2023 horror movie "Pandemonium" lands on a very generous three out of ten stars.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Pandemonium?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Девятые врата: Пандемониум
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 41.843
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 35 min(95 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39:1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente