AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,8/10
12 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Situado dez anos após um evento apocalíptico que matou milhões e deixou o mundo habitado por fantasmas.Situado dez anos após um evento apocalíptico que matou milhões e deixou o mundo habitado por fantasmas.Situado dez anos após um evento apocalíptico que matou milhões e deixou o mundo habitado por fantasmas.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
David Lawrence Brown
- Principal Pescatelli
- (as David Brown)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Within moments I was oddly gripped, I loved the concept and the whole thing looked sleek, original and fascinating.
Starring the stunning Bella Thorne and underappreciated Dermot Mulroney this is one that is very hard to pigeon hole as it doesn't really fall under one category.
It tells the story of a science experiment gone wrong and a world where ghosts walk among the living frequently, though they are unable to interact nor aware that they're deceased.
The ideas within the movie are remarkably clever but I quickly began to think that they'd be better suited to a television series rather than a movie. By the end, I had that belief confirmed. Don't get me wrong I Still See You is a very enjoyable movie but I think it was perhaps released in the wrong format.
Genuinely clever, interesting and captivating I can't argue that it isn't without its flaws as truth be told it has many BUT the quality of the film outweighs them.
I'd recommend the film to anyone and everyone, sure it has that teen-sci fi vibe about it but thankfully manages to be considerably better than that.
I'd love to see this become a television series, I'd rush to watch that every week. But if this is all we get, then it's enough.
The Good:
Looks great
Bella Thorne and Dermot Mulroney
Some great ideas
The Bad:
Some of the ideas don't feel fully formed
Leaves a lot of unanswered questions
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
There is still life in the ghost sub genre
We need more original movies like this and less reboots
Starring the stunning Bella Thorne and underappreciated Dermot Mulroney this is one that is very hard to pigeon hole as it doesn't really fall under one category.
It tells the story of a science experiment gone wrong and a world where ghosts walk among the living frequently, though they are unable to interact nor aware that they're deceased.
The ideas within the movie are remarkably clever but I quickly began to think that they'd be better suited to a television series rather than a movie. By the end, I had that belief confirmed. Don't get me wrong I Still See You is a very enjoyable movie but I think it was perhaps released in the wrong format.
Genuinely clever, interesting and captivating I can't argue that it isn't without its flaws as truth be told it has many BUT the quality of the film outweighs them.
I'd recommend the film to anyone and everyone, sure it has that teen-sci fi vibe about it but thankfully manages to be considerably better than that.
I'd love to see this become a television series, I'd rush to watch that every week. But if this is all we get, then it's enough.
The Good:
Looks great
Bella Thorne and Dermot Mulroney
Some great ideas
The Bad:
Some of the ideas don't feel fully formed
Leaves a lot of unanswered questions
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
There is still life in the ghost sub genre
We need more original movies like this and less reboots
Really enjoyed this for the following reasons:
1) Mystery aspect, sci-fi aspect, horror aspect.
2) Told a story where I didn't think " man I have seen this plot a hundred times" I couldn't guess the ending right away. Didn't end with some lame or annoying conclusion.
3) The intrigue builds through out 4) Elements are dropped along the way that actually get used in the plot progress.
5) Has a dark feel to the environment, the characters and the main point.
Not sure about the negative reviews, I just think sometimes people enjoy cutting down something that they didn't invest the work to make. Or maybe they expected a Spielberg epic or a Transformers CGI fest.
Give it a try.
2) Told a story where I didn't think " man I have seen this plot a hundred times" I couldn't guess the ending right away. Didn't end with some lame or annoying conclusion.
3) The intrigue builds through out 4) Elements are dropped along the way that actually get used in the plot progress.
5) Has a dark feel to the environment, the characters and the main point.
Not sure about the negative reviews, I just think sometimes people enjoy cutting down something that they didn't invest the work to make. Or maybe they expected a Spielberg epic or a Transformers CGI fest.
Give it a try.
It was going so well until an hour in, then you hear one line and understand the writer couldn't think of anything better. It then just follows the normal attributes to this type of film. However the acting is good and it is constantly moving so give it a go, in fact I've just added an extra mark as I was being to critical.
I really liked underlying premise of this movie, specifically that the millions of people killed by a cataclysmic event became ghosts, or remnants. In addition to this novel concept, the acting was good, and the characters' motivations and actions were logical and intelligent. In fact, I can't think of a single instance where extremely poor decision-making was used to advance the plot, setting this apart from most horror/thriller movies.
On the minus side, there were a number of plot holes and cheesy bits. Although they weren't bad enough to ruin the movie, there were enough of them that I can only give it a 7/10.
Overall, it was an enjoyable movie, and I would recommend it.
On the minus side, there were a number of plot holes and cheesy bits. Although they weren't bad enough to ruin the movie, there were enough of them that I can only give it a 7/10.
Overall, it was an enjoyable movie, and I would recommend it.
I totally understand if you already voted not useful. I can't always explain what I think or what goes on ... thought process and all that. I just type what comes to mind. Now I'm not suggesting the scriptwriter here had the same inclinations. Especially because this is based on a novel that I have not read yet (so no comparisons I can make to that).
Interesting premise, interesting story to say the least. Gets way cliche towards the end, so a bit of letdown. At least I felt that way. I would have gone higher rating, if it didn't try to just ... do the easy way out. But still for the very powerful beginning and a lot of visual and otherwise treats this serves you, I think one can watch this and be entertained (if you are into horror science fiction stuff).
Interesting premise, interesting story to say the least. Gets way cliche towards the end, so a bit of letdown. At least I felt that way. I would have gone higher rating, if it didn't try to just ... do the easy way out. But still for the very powerful beginning and a lot of visual and otherwise treats this serves you, I think one can watch this and be entertained (if you are into horror science fiction stuff).
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe film is based on the 2012 novel "Break My Heart 1,000 Times" by Daniel Waters.
- Erros de gravaçãoWhile Ronnie and Kirk are talking next to his car, the water tower in the background clearly says CARMAN. This is the town in Manitoba where some filming took place, though the movie's primary setting is fictional Jewel City, Illinois.
- Citações
Dr. Martin Steiner: The laws are lies, Miss Calder... bedtime stories for children to shut their eyes.
[chuckles]
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is I Still See You?Fornecido pela Alexa
- Is this a sequel to some movie ?
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 1.359
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 815
- 14 de out. de 2018
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 1.620.637
- Tempo de duração1 hora 38 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente