Após serem abandonados por Christopher, que foi para a faculdade, Ursinho Pooh e Leitão enlouquecem e juram vingança contra os seres humanos, partindo para uma caçada sangrenta em busca de u... Ler tudoApós serem abandonados por Christopher, que foi para a faculdade, Ursinho Pooh e Leitão enlouquecem e juram vingança contra os seres humanos, partindo para uma caçada sangrenta em busca de uma nova fonte de comida.Após serem abandonados por Christopher, que foi para a faculdade, Ursinho Pooh e Leitão enlouquecem e juram vingança contra os seres humanos, partindo para uma caçada sangrenta em busca de uma nova fonte de comida.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 6 vitórias no total
Richard D. Myers
- Logan
- (as Richard D Myers)
Avaliações em destaque
This movie is not a finished product, not even close. This needed AT LEAST a month or two longer in the editing room because it is a mess! I'm not even talking about the terrible story or acting because I knew I was getting that regardless, which is no problem for me as long as there's some carnage. I'm talking about the atrocious sound mixing/editing, the abrupt cuts and transitions, and nauseating camera work. The basics of filmmaking! Whenever someone is getting murdered, you can't even tell what is going on because the camera work is so amateurish and shoddy. It's almost like the camera operator was having a seizure whenever they were supposed to film a kill.
This movie had a $100,000 budget, yet they showed almost no gore/make-up FX when someone would die. If you're filming a low-budget B horror movie, people are going for the kills and not much else, therefore you better be pumping 80% of your budget into the "horror" aspect of the movie and show some people getting slaughtered.
Terrifier 1 had a $25,000 (a fraction of Blood and Honey's budget), yet showed every kill in grisly detail and people LOVED it! Then they made a sequel for $250,000 and made 13 million off it. I'm not sure where the $100,000 budget of this movie went, but it was most definitely not the kills, editing or acting. Maybe Pooh and Piglet's costumes were each $50,000 a piece, and if so the costume designer definitely pocketed that money.
The only reason I'm not giving this a 1 is because I like the concept of taking a fictional character from the public domain and putting a B horror twist on it. Though a good concept, the execution could not have been much worse. This should not have left editing room let alone released IN THEATERS! The distribution company should be held accountable. It's like video game developers releasing unfinished games. Trash.
2/10.
This movie had a $100,000 budget, yet they showed almost no gore/make-up FX when someone would die. If you're filming a low-budget B horror movie, people are going for the kills and not much else, therefore you better be pumping 80% of your budget into the "horror" aspect of the movie and show some people getting slaughtered.
Terrifier 1 had a $25,000 (a fraction of Blood and Honey's budget), yet showed every kill in grisly detail and people LOVED it! Then they made a sequel for $250,000 and made 13 million off it. I'm not sure where the $100,000 budget of this movie went, but it was most definitely not the kills, editing or acting. Maybe Pooh and Piglet's costumes were each $50,000 a piece, and if so the costume designer definitely pocketed that money.
The only reason I'm not giving this a 1 is because I like the concept of taking a fictional character from the public domain and putting a B horror twist on it. Though a good concept, the execution could not have been much worse. This should not have left editing room let alone released IN THEATERS! The distribution company should be held accountable. It's like video game developers releasing unfinished games. Trash.
2/10.
Let me start by saying that I went into this expecting it to be very, very bad, but sometimes that makes for a fun watch so I was open-minded. Literally the ONLY decent thing about this movie is the score; everything else, the acting, the writing, the plot, the complete and utter lack of even so much as an ATTEMPT at character development, was a complete mess. It's not one of those horrors that are "so bad it's good", it's just painful to sit through from beginning to end. Full of plot holes, completely lacking a protagonist, full of characters who are uninteresting and un-likeable, I can't imagine how anybody could enjoy this movie.
Some horror films are so bad that they're good. This one is just bad.
Nothing is good. The acting, the writing, the plot, the complete and utter lack of even so much as an ATTEMPT at character development, was a complete mess. It's not one of those horrors that are "so bad it's good", it's just painful to sit through from beginning to end. Full of plot holes, completely lacking a protagonist, full of characters who are uninteresting and un-likeable, I can't imagine how anybody could enjoy this movie.
Everyone involved should just quit the movie industry. Their lack of talent, judgement or consideration for their audience shows no compassion or remorse.
Nothing is good. The acting, the writing, the plot, the complete and utter lack of even so much as an ATTEMPT at character development, was a complete mess. It's not one of those horrors that are "so bad it's good", it's just painful to sit through from beginning to end. Full of plot holes, completely lacking a protagonist, full of characters who are uninteresting and un-likeable, I can't imagine how anybody could enjoy this movie.
Everyone involved should just quit the movie industry. Their lack of talent, judgement or consideration for their audience shows no compassion or remorse.
For a predominantly female cast, I could tell the writer was a male before I even double checked. He must thing all women are complete idiots. Not a single one ever had a plan, all they did was give half-hearted screams and run very, very badly. Of course in his defense, Christopher Robin wasn't much better. It was a snooze fest.
I'd had relatively decent hopes for this. The premise was original and the opening animation was lovely. Another reviewer said if they'd made a short from there, it would've been amazing and I agree. But they fleshed out no plot, spent zero on the costuming of the iconic leads (I'm serious, hitting up a Dollar Tree would've been more affective) and left everything with no resolution at the end, presumably to make room for a sequel.
So, I gave it three stars for the start and for encouraging others to use their talents on works now in the public domain. Hopefully something more interesting and exciting will come from it.
I'd had relatively decent hopes for this. The premise was original and the opening animation was lovely. Another reviewer said if they'd made a short from there, it would've been amazing and I agree. But they fleshed out no plot, spent zero on the costuming of the iconic leads (I'm serious, hitting up a Dollar Tree would've been more affective) and left everything with no resolution at the end, presumably to make room for a sequel.
So, I gave it three stars for the start and for encouraging others to use their talents on works now in the public domain. Hopefully something more interesting and exciting will come from it.
Hard to find anything good about this film. Even the original disney version was scarier. Felt like some school project and the actors where from same school. It would hav been possible to make great film from this story but this was just awful. Only some of the bloody effects where made good. Just read that they gonna make number two and hard to understand why that would be beneficial. Even if i could see this film for free it still would feel like waste of my time.
If you like this film there's something very wrong in you. Pulling nails is more entertaining. Stay away from this piece of phoo.
If you like this film there's something very wrong in you. Pulling nails is more entertaining. Stay away from this piece of phoo.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesProduction of the film became possible in 2022 after A.A. Milne's novel "Winnie-the-Pooh" (1926) entered the public domain in the United States, which marked the first appearances of Winnie-the-Pooh, Piglet and Christopher Robin. The film's characters could not, however, resemble the Disney versions, who debuted in 1966 and are protected by copyright.
- Erros de gravaçãoAt 48:40, when Piglet is swinging the heavy chain into the pool, the chain floats as the character pulls it back. Chains do not float on water unassisted.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosAfter the credits finish, there is text seen reading "WINNIE-THE-POOH WILL RETURN.", hinting at a sequel.
- ConexõesFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Silly Old Deadly Bear (2022)
- Trilhas sonoras3:33
Written by Inas
Performed by Inas
Produced by Sidxkick/Inas
Courtesy of Inas
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey?Fornecido pela Alexa
- If the film was made in Britain, why did they need to wait for the copyright on Winnie the Pooh to expire in the USA?
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 100.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 2.082.898
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 652.482
- 19 de fev. de 2023
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 7.717.044
- Tempo de duração1 hora 24 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the streaming release date of Ursinho Pooh: Sangue e Mel (2023) in Spain?
Responda