Um ladrão com um código único de ética profissional é traído por sua equipe e deixado para morrer. Assumindo um novo disfarce e formando uma aliança improvável com uma mulher de dentro do es... Ler tudoUm ladrão com um código único de ética profissional é traído por sua equipe e deixado para morrer. Assumindo um novo disfarce e formando uma aliança improvável com uma mulher de dentro do esquema, ele tenta tomar o produto do roubo do último assalto da sua equipe.Um ladrão com um código único de ética profissional é traído por sua equipe e deixado para morrer. Assumindo um novo disfarce e formando uma aliança improvável com uma mulher de dentro do esquema, ele tenta tomar o produto do roubo do último assalto da sua equipe.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
- Ohio State Fair Accounts Manager
- (as Carl Walker)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Well, the script is probably the weakest part of the movie: too much predictability, excessive sections (e.g. Parker-Claire, prolonging the duration to almost 2 hour 15 minutes) and trivial ending (unlike in movies by Guy Ritchie, for example).
Nevertheless, Parker is still an above-average A-movie, qualifying well for a sociable entertainment.
Alas, it was not to be. And it has almost nothing to do with J-Lo being in the movie. The characters are bland, illogical in almost everything they do, even Parker, the Statham's character. Worst than that: they are unsympathetic. You have a lot of greedy people, some of them evil, some of them stupid, and apart from them is Parker, who is not greedy, just stupid. He puts everybody at risk for his own principles, he gets beat up and shot a few times and somehow he still walks. It's like Crank, but without anything fun in it.
I have to say I am a fan of Michael Chiklis, from Vegas, but his role was small and two dimensional. One dimensional, really, but I was going with the cardboard metaphor. You wanna know who was the most clear cut character, the one that did the job and was consistent? Daniel Bernhardt in the role of the Mafia killing machine.
So, bottom line: a waste of time and of good actors.
It's not the most complicated plot ever, but it has its basic building blocks in a neat row and knows what it's doing. A film like this is pretty much destined to the B movie pin, but there's something to be said about the charisma of Jason Statham. And J.Lo, for that matter.
What's most enjoyable about this film is its heist hijinks. Whenever Parker is smooth talking his way through red tape or conning people into doing whatever he wants, the film soars. Whenever it's doing anything else, it's pretty banal. J.Lo's character is admiringly grounded and you get her blight. But at the same time, she's perhaps too grounded for the film's style. If you catch my drift. I'd much rather see this type of character in a psychological crime drama or something like that.
Nevertheless, I enjoyed watching the film. A good film to check out if you're a fan of Statham or lighthearted heist films. And if you're not, it's still a pretty slick experience.
Seems that some big stars want to hitch their wagon to a profitable venture such as any Jason Statham movie. Here we have Jennifer Lopez doing that and when I first saw her name associated with this I knew 2-things: She would get a lot of screen time and many, many lines too. Okay, 3-three things: this won't be as good as other Jason Statham movies. I was in cringeville. And, then I watched the movie and was wrong, wrong, wrong. She did good. Who knew?
However, there was a difference with this movie. Most of the time Mr Statham's character goes about his business cutting down the bad guys without any real complication, but in here he meets his match with some bad guys who kind of beat the hell out of him. He still wins, but it's not easy. Some of the fight scenes were too real for me and I had to check myself into the local ER to make sure all was okay. I am fine. Thanks for asking.
Add to the beatings, we have Leslie (Jennifer Lopez) getting in the way of Parker's plan to take out the bad guys. Okay, we knew something like this would happen and we cringed for a bit, but we were pleasantly surprised that she did good. Who knew?
All in all a good action thriller as we would expect from any Jason Statham movie even with a star who hitched her wagon to a profitable venture ..but did good. Who knew? Nick Nolte and Michael Chiklis also star.
Will we see other big stars hitch their wagon to other successful ventures: Matt Damon, Bruce Willis, Arnold (hey, is he back?), Sylvester? Time will tell. We can only hope the scripts will be as good as this one was. Kudos. (7/10)
Violence: Yes. Sex: No. Nudity: Yes, briefly, 2-times.. Language: Yes, not much.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThis is the first adaptation of a Richard Stark/Parker novel to use the character name Parker, the name from the novels. Although the following movies are based on the "Parker" novels, the name was always changed: À Queima-Roupa (1967) (Walker); Quadrilha em Pânico (1968) (McClain); A Quadrilha (1973) (Macklin); Alugado para Matar (1983) (Stone); and O Troco (1999) (Porter).
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen the fireworks at the auction go off, a woman in a black dress runs down the center aisle twice.
- Citações
Leslie Rodgers: How do you sleep at night?
Parker: I don't drink coffee after 7.
- ConexõesFeatured in Bringing the Hunter to Life: The Making of 'Parker' (2013)
Principais escolhas
- How long is Parker?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Tay Trộm Chuyên Nghiệp
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 35.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 17.616.641
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 7.008.222
- 27 de jan. de 2013
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 46.922.566
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 58 min(118 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1