Depois que o mundo está em ruínas, devido a uma praga feita pelo homem, uma batalha de proporções literalmente bíblicas ocorre entre os sobreviventes.Depois que o mundo está em ruínas, devido a uma praga feita pelo homem, uma batalha de proporções literalmente bíblicas ocorre entre os sobreviventes.Depois que o mundo está em ruínas, devido a uma praga feita pelo homem, uma batalha de proporções literalmente bíblicas ocorre entre os sobreviventes.
- Prêmios
- 2 indicações no total
Explorar episódios
Resumo
Reviewers say 'The Stand' adaptation receives mixed reactions. Praise for casting and production values, with standout performances by James Marsden and Alexander Skarsgard. Criticisms include non-linear storytelling and deviations from the novel, causing confusion and disappointing book purists. Some appreciate the modern take, finding the series engaging despite flaws. Themes of good versus evil and the apocalypse receive varied responses, with some feeling the depth and tension are lacking. Overall, it's seen as a decent but imperfect adaptation.
Avaliações em destaque
I've read a few reviews from Stephen King groupies...and fair enough. The 1994 series had me mesmerized, though I had let it slip from memory. So this was exciting.
Really if life came down to these characters, we are mince. It's so hard to identify with the 'righteous' at times, they seem oblivious to the world they're in. And the 'unclean' are really bland, the depravity is what you'd see going on if the world never went through this 'apocalypse' anyway. There is no awe at the Man himself, though he presents as the most watchable character...I don't know if there is enough going on to pique the interest to see it through.
I don't like making comparisons, but I can't help it in this instance. The 1994 miniseries had it's flaws, but at least it stuck to the main themes of the book; the human beings as pawns in a game of good and evil, who they are and become. Only one episode left of the 2020 version and I feel nothing for any of the characters, simply because I don't know them.
It is based on a massive book, but the 1994 miniseries managed to create a cohesively evolving story and characters. And that in a 6 hour long series. This version has 9 hours and yet the story is so all over the place that so many things don't make sense anymore. As if the writers were puzzling and piecing, cutting and pasting, until they just gave up, rather than working until it made sense.
This version seems to hope it can get by on chock value, but it completely misses the point when turning New Vegas into a Sodom or Gomorrah, rather than a fascist state, for example.
It's a hot mess, and if you're too lazy to read the book, then watch the 1994 version instead.
It is based on a massive book, but the 1994 miniseries managed to create a cohesively evolving story and characters. And that in a 6 hour long series. This version has 9 hours and yet the story is so all over the place that so many things don't make sense anymore. As if the writers were puzzling and piecing, cutting and pasting, until they just gave up, rather than working until it made sense.
This version seems to hope it can get by on chock value, but it completely misses the point when turning New Vegas into a Sodom or Gomorrah, rather than a fascist state, for example.
It's a hot mess, and if you're too lazy to read the book, then watch the 1994 version instead.
Save yourself time and watch the original or read the book.
Too much flashing around, sideways, forwards, backwards.
Whoopi Goldberg and Alexander Skarsgård are terrible miscasts.
I personally loathe Whoopi Goldberg as an actress. She strikes me as a washed up hippie in every single role. Casting her here as Mother Abagail she lacks the necessary motherly qualities for the role and comes across as... a washed up hippie. She looks the role but it isn't her.
Alexander Skarsgård meanwhile... he just doesn't have the element for Flagg. He comes across as a boring guy that would be best cast as a ride along cop in a police movie. He's not in the right element here.
Most of the other characters are mostly OK, but not stand outs.
Now split this up into 1hr runtimes. It drags out an already long story longer. Without the elements of continuity due to the flashbacks and such it's less immersive.
Read the book watch the original. Don't waste the time here.
Too much flashing around, sideways, forwards, backwards.
Whoopi Goldberg and Alexander Skarsgård are terrible miscasts.
I personally loathe Whoopi Goldberg as an actress. She strikes me as a washed up hippie in every single role. Casting her here as Mother Abagail she lacks the necessary motherly qualities for the role and comes across as... a washed up hippie. She looks the role but it isn't her.
Alexander Skarsgård meanwhile... he just doesn't have the element for Flagg. He comes across as a boring guy that would be best cast as a ride along cop in a police movie. He's not in the right element here.
Most of the other characters are mostly OK, but not stand outs.
Now split this up into 1hr runtimes. It drags out an already long story longer. Without the elements of continuity due to the flashbacks and such it's less immersive.
Read the book watch the original. Don't waste the time here.
Maybe I'm the target audience for this current adaptation of The Stand. I didn't read the book and didn't see the 1994 mini series so I watched it with no preconceived biases. I was surprised how much I enjoyed it based on the awful reviews. Yeah, none of the actors are going to win an emmy and it seemed to bounce around a bit so there were times I was confused but I just kept watching and everything fell into place eventually. The storyline was good, not great, so I'm guessing the book was better, as many have pointed out. All in all, I'm glad I ignored the 1 star reviews and watched it. Maybe now I'll read the book and compare.
It's a nine part TV adaptation of the Stephen King novel of good versus evil. It's not any better than the 1994 version. More money may have been spent but it's not better. The structure is more disjointed which leaves the characters less compelling. I don't like Whoopi Goldberg in this role. The last episode feels stretched out which leaves it without tension. After the climax, the series needs to end. It's an unnecessary update of this material. If it needs doing, it needs some better imagination to bring new life to the story.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesBryan Cranston: A voice-only appearance as the President of the United States in episode 1, giving an address to the people about the virus. Cranston agreed to the role after being asked by co-creator Benjamin Cavell.
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Stu is taken to the first military facility in Texas they say it is in Kileen. The name of the city is spelled Killeen.
- ConexõesFeatured in The Cinema Snob: The Stand 2020 (2021)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Протистояння
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 57 min
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
- 2.4:1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente