Avaliações de usuários

They get a $150,000 for the renovation. Some of the houses are going to take a lot more than $150,000. So that eliminates some of the houses. Like this first season one house would of taken $500,000 easy.

HGTV can afford to renovate all these ugly houses. Do it !!!

Don't leave these houses ugly. Fixing 1 isn't enough. 11 more houses to fix.

HGTV can afford to renovate all these ugly houses.

Let's be real. They picked the house that they thought would be the easiest to design and gain all this glory.

Binged watch season two to see what it was all about and it was the biggest disappointment ever. The only great part was the host Retta.

Let's truly pick the ugliest!!! Let the viewers decide. Come on, make this a REAL challenge. Let the viewers vote and really see how good of a designer she is. Not "Let's pick the one we know we can design the easiest because it is not much work".

Just my opinion and will not waste time watching season one or any other.

Retta is funny and charming. Love her colorful commentary. The show is different than most. There's no overacting and dramatization as on every HGTV remodel show. We hope it's renewed.

Are you kidding me??? The house with no privacy wasn't even ugly. Or non functional!!! The Amityville house was ugly!!! And it was way more non functional!!!!

And the rock house wasn't the ugliest either! The other ones were way more non functional.

The first season y'all did great but what is wrong???

I loved the array of houses here. Not many were "ugly," but rather thematic or unique - making for a fun walkthrough of nontraditional houses and aesthetics. The host and the designer are fun and enthusiastic, with Retta's facial expressions being top-notch on numerous occasions. The editing is also enjoyable, offering both facts/tidbits and sass (such as the counters for various features and reactions).

But I think it leans into the "ugly" bashing a bit too hard considering the houses in question. This show's definition of ugly seems to take on the broader meaning of "in need of updating and improving function." I'm not personally a fan of the designer (her style isn't my sort of thing, and I feel like she leans too hard into making everything have one style throughout the finished product), but the end results are typically quite pretty. Although, with that in mind, I can't help but wonder if some of the final choices were made according to who was open to letting the designer run with her preferences. Perhaps we would have seen more houses or more ugly winners (pointed look at season 2 in particular) if each season had a different designer.

What a wonderful idea for a show!

I like Retta and the process, but a lot of the houses are just a little dated, or overly opulent, and aren't even ugly. Some of the houses are actually very beautiful.

Then the designer comes in..... Oh, so predictable: She rips out the gorgeous kitchen cabinets to put in the same ones in only darker and paints all the walls an ugly grey colour. Come on now. Is anyone else sick of open floor plan with grey paint as a go-to?

Every time I watch this, I feel like the results are much worse than the start. Last year, they had a huge gross house to rehab, and they took out the kitchen, the only beautiful thing in the house. So sad.

Please, please, please hire a better, more innovative designer!!!

First the homes are hideous and so fun to see with Retta. She and Alison are a new comedy team. Alison knows how to renovate and her personality is perfect for this show. Loving this show.

It's not unusual for the ugliest house, not to be chosen. I can only imagine that's because it would take a whole lot more than $150,000 to redo those homes. So I kind of feel bad for the owners of the really ugly homes, but then again, nobody forced them to buy those places, so they kind of did it to themselves. I would love to hear the stories of the people who actually designed those homes to be so ugly. Of course, they would probably be too embarrassed to go on TV. It might be interesting down the road to have episodes showing how the houses that weren't picked might have been updated.

Show is still entertaining.

I did not think that the chosen home was the actual ugliest, however I was pleasantly suprised by the renovation. Generally I will not watch Allyson Victoria, as shevdestroyed so many gorgeous Vintage ctorians in Chicago . However, I loved that she did not destroy the great banquettes and actually made them beautiful as well as functional. The wall paper was very attractive and stylish as well. I actually enjoyed the show and was impressed by the overall look . I loved the outside space as it made the home seem more clean temporary and offered the opportunity to entertain both indoors and out. I especially loved the fact that Greta looked so beautiful and stylish in her clothing. Her new style is very flattering.

Retta is the greatest thing about this show! She's really funny and her commentary and reactions are enjoyable to watch. I really enjoyed season one. It was new and different. However, in the most recent season (aired early Jan 2023) they're showing mostly giant houses owned by upper middle class people that really are not that ugly. I'm sure they could find truly ugly houses - perhaps with people who really need the $ for the renovation. I like the rapport between Retta and Alison Victoria in the final episode of each season; however, the biggest drawback for me is Allison Victoria's designs at the end of the season. She basically takes away all the charm of the house and makes it as bland as possible. Disappointing after all the build up.

This show does a great job of showcasing houses that are ugly, however with that being said they pick the houses that will be the easiest to remodel. You can tell the show wants to be able to show off a nice home at the end rather than overcoming a challenge and remodeling an actual ugly home that is not functional. The house on the first season the house was ugly, but was purchased by her father. The house in the second season could have been passed over. The house in the third season just required cosmetic updates. The houses it was up against were worse. Additionally, there was a home that was not included as a finalist and I'm sure that was due to the amount of work it would have needed.

I like the show with the host being very funny, but with the last series I think you chose wrong. The young girl didn't buy the house her father did. No expense to her. He bought a very weird house with all the cameras dirty pool etc. All they had to do was remove the cameras, paint, remodel the BR, kitchen and exterior. The true ugliest house and the people who really needed the help was the under the sea home with statue in the front. This wasn't chose because you probably couldn't have fixed it fir the 150,000. You should have tried. Those people needed help more. You need to think about your real choices and the reality of your obvious limitations.you should still offer help to the other home.

Take the successful house hunters format (3 houses-which will they pick??) and mix it with a hilarious host and you get junk tv gold. It's the perfect show to relax and chill out to after a long day. It's just a fun, happy show.

Forget the show. Okay, don't forget the show. Thoroughly enjoyed it! Those were some nasty choices. Too bad you can't award more than one winner. However, I was glued to the set for each wardrobe change. Each change was fantastic. Love the designer or whoever your stylist may be. I was anticipating the wardrobe in every episode. Love, love, love your clothes. I felt like I was following the designer for Suits again, only more wearable. Keep up the gorgeous choices.

The show's premise is a good one but needs a little work to keep the viewer interested such as cost breakdowns, are the best deals sought on appliances?, how long do the renovations take?, how many workers did it take to complete the job?, what was the most expensive fix? The answers to these questions would help a great deal - especially to the viewers who are considering renovating their own homes.

Retta is completely wonderful and is - so far the reason to tune in & watch each episode. Her charm, warmth, and humor shine.

Retta is the perfect host for this show, very funny, and it seemed unscripted. That's the issue with so many shows lately, they are scripted and dramatized and overall a terrible show, but I've noticed on Discovery+, that's not the case, especially with this show. Ugliest House in America had a nearly perfect 1st season, Episode 4 was the only one that wasn't as good as the others, the houses just weren't near as ugly. However, Episode 2 was my favorite, it had the House of No Secrets, and I thought overall it was just such a enjoyable episode. I and many others hope this show is renewed and goes on for the long run, unscripted, fun, and just an enjoyable show to sit back and relax to. This show is totally recommended by me and many others, it's well worth your time, and if the show is renewed I hope they have more houses, different locations, and a bigger renovation budget, which would make this show shine.

It's interesting to see all the homes that need work all over the USA. The host is decent but she really seems to think she is funnier than she is and it's distracting sometimes. The houses that win aren't always the ugliest and they seem to pick houses that don't have a lot of tear out. The remodeled houses look good. I would like to know what the selection process is to have a house win. I have some suspicions they choose some houses based on what they can do for $150k and avoid additional production costs. Hopefully they can redo it a little or even find a better host. It's going to kill the show eventually.

I loved this mini series! It was straight to the point, I enjoyed seeing Retta she's seems very nice, and was outgoing which made the show pretty likable I hope that there is a season 2!

Does the people not take a look inside the houses before they buy??

I sit and my jaw is on the floor.

The houses are not only ugly they are DIRTY.

And they just buy house that has previous owners junk they sleep in dirty beds and eat in those disgusting places .

I wanna puke.

Silly silly silly and SILLY!

Only reason to watch is Retta.

Shes funny.

Its your fault to buy a house on the internet and buy it because it looks good on the outside ..

Omy i have to write 600 words here so i am bubbling some bla bla bla to get it done and its not even funny.

I said what i said and thats enough..ok?

I am not a fan of the designer Allison. She is obsessed with the color green (pea green) and uses it as often as possible. She also uses the show to promote her own products which explains how she found kitchen appliances in pea green. I would like to see different designers.