AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,5/10
7,9 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Na esteira de um colapso ambiental que está forçando a humanidade a se livrar de 20% de sua população, um jantar em família se transforma em caos quando o plano do pai de se alistar no novo ... Ler tudoNa esteira de um colapso ambiental que está forçando a humanidade a se livrar de 20% de sua população, um jantar em família se transforma em caos quando o plano do pai de se alistar no novo programa de eutanásia dá terrivelmente errado.Na esteira de um colapso ambiental que está forçando a humanidade a se livrar de 20% de sua população, um jantar em família se transforma em caos quando o plano do pai de se alistar no novo programa de eutanásia dá terrivelmente errado.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 5 indicações no total
Lisa Berry
- Newscaster
- (narração)
Colm Feore
- Secretary-General of the U.N.
- (narração)
Avaliações em destaque
So I won't go into a movie summary since IMDb already does a pretty good job of doing that. It is watchable, but kind of slow to get started. The acting is very average for all involved except for the two main character husband and wife...they of course are quite seasoned. The soundtrack, yea that is really lacking. And actually takes away from many scenes while always playing softly in the background. But where this film is actually quite strong is the cinematography. Whoever the cinematographer was for the movie knew his business. Not a single shakey-cam anywhere. They set up the scenes and and shots it all really well. That is something so new. Typically it is annoying shakey-cam and high school level film class shots. So it's worth a watch.
Fantastic that it's directed by Caitlin Cronenberg related to some legends. I wanted to see sooner glad it's available on Shudder, shocked by the low ratings the movie is brilliant and smooth amazing concept! Odd how there's a service to enlist in being killed by injection or for one the family to decide. I love the character Bob he's fantastic all around. Unique to see Jay in horror genre I don't think he has before or at least very little. I barely knew much about the movie it's quite satisfying, probably under appreciated for the acting or maybe something else a lot of it is so good I really like Humane.
After stumbling upon many negative reviews around here, I felt compelled to share my thoughts with my first review. This film doesn't quite hit the lows that many claim, nor does it reach the heights promised by its premise.
The core issue is rather straightforward: the script (skillfully executed by Michael Sparaga) leans heavily into satire, however, it appears that not everyone involved in the production fully embraced this idea. The film oscillates between moments of absurdity, humor, thriller, and straight-up horror, leading to a somewhat disjointed direction. While there are occasional flashes of comedic bullseyes, the constant comparison to David Cronenberg's esteemed body horror of work is inevitable, despite the absence of substantial horror elements (barring a few graphic close-ups in the third act).
The movie would have greatly benefited from leaning further into its satirical elements rather than focusing primarily on horror and suspense. This failure to fully embrace its comedic side left me feeling somewhat confused. Is it a left-wing nightmare? A mockery of right-wing extremes? Probably neither. This imbalance, favoring horror over absurdist hilarity, likely contributed to the dissatisfaction of many viewers. When the socio-political message becomes too apparent in any form of art, there's a risk of either angering or boring the audience.
Still, if viewed as a satire, the movie with its one-location concept offers an entertaining experience. It serves as a commendable directorial debut and showcases a standout performance by Enrico Colantoni, who knows exactly what kind of movie he's in.
The core issue is rather straightforward: the script (skillfully executed by Michael Sparaga) leans heavily into satire, however, it appears that not everyone involved in the production fully embraced this idea. The film oscillates between moments of absurdity, humor, thriller, and straight-up horror, leading to a somewhat disjointed direction. While there are occasional flashes of comedic bullseyes, the constant comparison to David Cronenberg's esteemed body horror of work is inevitable, despite the absence of substantial horror elements (barring a few graphic close-ups in the third act).
The movie would have greatly benefited from leaning further into its satirical elements rather than focusing primarily on horror and suspense. This failure to fully embrace its comedic side left me feeling somewhat confused. Is it a left-wing nightmare? A mockery of right-wing extremes? Probably neither. This imbalance, favoring horror over absurdist hilarity, likely contributed to the dissatisfaction of many viewers. When the socio-political message becomes too apparent in any form of art, there's a risk of either angering or boring the audience.
Still, if viewed as a satire, the movie with its one-location concept offers an entertaining experience. It serves as a commendable directorial debut and showcases a standout performance by Enrico Colantoni, who knows exactly what kind of movie he's in.
I watched Humane. I liked the idea. And the movie kept my interest. But I just couldn't really believe it.
If D. O. C. S. did all that, (by "all that," I mean details that would spoil the movie if I were to write them,) and any family knew about it, that information would spread like wildfire. It wouldn't have been a big surprise to the family.
The end was cheesy AF. Not believable at all.
I disliked the politics of the film also. It would have been way more believable to have the World Health Organization doing all of it, rather than a single political party.
There are numerous other things that just didn't add up in it also.
Buuuuut... it held my interest. And the CONCEPT of the film was very original and intriguing, which is way more than I can say for the other movies coming out nowadays. The movie was good, but it could have been great with just a bit more thought put into it.
If D. O. C. S. did all that, (by "all that," I mean details that would spoil the movie if I were to write them,) and any family knew about it, that information would spread like wildfire. It wouldn't have been a big surprise to the family.
The end was cheesy AF. Not believable at all.
I disliked the politics of the film also. It would have been way more believable to have the World Health Organization doing all of it, rather than a single political party.
There are numerous other things that just didn't add up in it also.
Buuuuut... it held my interest. And the CONCEPT of the film was very original and intriguing, which is way more than I can say for the other movies coming out nowadays. The movie was good, but it could have been great with just a bit more thought put into it.
I recently watched the Canadian film 🇨🇦 Humane (2024) on Shudder. The storyline follows a global agreement for a 20% population reduction and a wealthy family caught in the middle of the crisis. Some members of the family support the plan, some oppose it, and they even discover that some of them are volunteering to participate. As the process for collecting volunteers unfolds, things take an interesting turn.
This film is directed by Caitlin Cronenberg in her directorial debut, and stars Jay Baruchel (Goon), Emily Hampshire (Schitt's Creek), Peter Gallagher (American Beauty), Colm Feore (Chicago), with a cameo by David Cronenberg (The Fly).
The premise feels like a unique spin on The Purge, with dialogue, perspectives, and circumstances that don't seem far-fetched, which adds to the film's entertainment value. The cast is well-chosen and fun to watch, and the action scenes are great, featuring plenty of slashing, stabbing, and fighting. There are lots of intense moments with stabs, slices, and cuts. While I did find some of the decision-making frustrating at times, it didn't overly detract from the film.
In conclusion, Humane doesn't really bring anything new to the genre but is still worth a watch. I'd give it a 6.5-7/10 and recommend seeing it at least once.
This film is directed by Caitlin Cronenberg in her directorial debut, and stars Jay Baruchel (Goon), Emily Hampshire (Schitt's Creek), Peter Gallagher (American Beauty), Colm Feore (Chicago), with a cameo by David Cronenberg (The Fly).
The premise feels like a unique spin on The Purge, with dialogue, perspectives, and circumstances that don't seem far-fetched, which adds to the film's entertainment value. The cast is well-chosen and fun to watch, and the action scenes are great, featuring plenty of slashing, stabbing, and fighting. There are lots of intense moments with stabs, slices, and cuts. While I did find some of the decision-making frustrating at times, it didn't overly detract from the film.
In conclusion, Humane doesn't really bring anything new to the genre but is still worth a watch. I'd give it a 6.5-7/10 and recommend seeing it at least once.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesBob's Instagram account, @whataboutbob42 is real. In the movie, he talks about a photo from when he only had 4 unpopped popcorn kernels in a bag. That photo is there, and is interestingly dated at March 20th, 2021, more than three years before the film's release.
- ConexõesReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 941: Challengers + 3 Body Problem (2024)
- Trilhas sonorasPrelude in D flat major Op. 28 no. 15
written by Frederic Chopin
performed by Sebastian Chacon
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Humane?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- İnsancıl
- Locações de filme
- Hamilton, Ontário, Canadá(entire film)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 44.509
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 26.850
- 28 de abr. de 2024
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 44.509
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 33 min(93 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente