AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,5/10
1,3 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaIn order to wed his sweetheart, a male must reverse a 350-year old curse on her family.In order to wed his sweetheart, a male must reverse a 350-year old curse on her family.In order to wed his sweetheart, a male must reverse a 350-year old curse on her family.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 2 vitórias no total
Ashok Kumar Beniwal
- Raza - Curator of Jail Museum
- (as Ashok Beniwal)
Avaliações em destaque
Shaapit was my first horror movie seen in a theater. and believe me, it justified the price paid for the ticket. Most of the theater was empty which added to the atmosphere. It may not be the best Vikram Bhatt horror flick but still has some good jump scares. I consider Vikram's Raaz as one of the best bollywood horror films.
the positives: spooky atmosphere, great story setting and build-up, a good mix of science, mythology and history, melodious music, some scary effects & BGM considering it was a low-budget film
the negatives: the cast was new except Rahul Dev so acting was a bit hit-n-miss, Aditya Narayan looked a little childish for the the part of hero but his efforts are worth appreciating, the CGI effects on ghost's design were cheesy
On the whole, a very entertaining fare from Bollywood horror veteran Vikram Bhatt
the positives: spooky atmosphere, great story setting and build-up, a good mix of science, mythology and history, melodious music, some scary effects & BGM considering it was a low-budget film
the negatives: the cast was new except Rahul Dev so acting was a bit hit-n-miss, Aditya Narayan looked a little childish for the the part of hero but his efforts are worth appreciating, the CGI effects on ghost's design were cheesy
On the whole, a very entertaining fare from Bollywood horror veteran Vikram Bhatt
I just watched this movie and I liked it. This movie is completely Indian one. Horror quotient is great. The story is quite good. But I think there should be more clarification given about the connection between the curse and the ghost.
They successfully created a spooky environment in this movie which I think very new to Hindi movies. I liked the professor concept also. They successfully make this character believable also. And they made a good balance between the love and horror. The direction, editing, sound and camera is great. I jumped a lot times in my chair during this movie.
Now what I don't liked: 1. design of the Ghost. They should have worked more on that.
2. The song ( I think we can call that item song ) sung before the prince, totally ruined the environment of the movie.
3. The last destruction scene of ghost. That was too childish.
They successfully created a spooky environment in this movie which I think very new to Hindi movies. I liked the professor concept also. They successfully make this character believable also. And they made a good balance between the love and horror. The direction, editing, sound and camera is great. I jumped a lot times in my chair during this movie.
Now what I don't liked: 1. design of the Ghost. They should have worked more on that.
2. The song ( I think we can call that item song ) sung before the prince, totally ruined the environment of the movie.
3. The last destruction scene of ghost. That was too childish.
When I watched Vikram Bhatt's previous horror outing "1920" I thought man, this guy has got some style. It was like giving stiff competition to Ramgopal Verma. And with the same expectation levels if you happen to watch "Shaapit", the whole experience is so Ramsay Bros.
The writing is culprit, too many cinematic liberties. In terms of execution there are huge lapses. The love-track between the couple loaded with infatuation. One would expect an impact when Rahul Dev enters, sadly his character shapes up to blue-collar quack. The scary moments are glorified Ramsay's flick. The climax should have been trimmed to make it sleek. The period drama portion deserve special mention though.
The cat is out of the bag that Aditya Narayan has chosen unwisely. He lacks screen-presence. Shweta Agarwal barely has anything to contribute in second half. The chemistry between the pair is zero. Natasha Sinha apes Ila Arun. The performance of the priest who sets the curse in motion deserves special mention.
On a whole "Shaapit" barely escapes being classified a B-grade flick.
PS: Nearly forgot, I am enlightened that a few centuries ago even the royal blood had a penchant for item songs!
The writing is culprit, too many cinematic liberties. In terms of execution there are huge lapses. The love-track between the couple loaded with infatuation. One would expect an impact when Rahul Dev enters, sadly his character shapes up to blue-collar quack. The scary moments are glorified Ramsay's flick. The climax should have been trimmed to make it sleek. The period drama portion deserve special mention though.
The cat is out of the bag that Aditya Narayan has chosen unwisely. He lacks screen-presence. Shweta Agarwal barely has anything to contribute in second half. The chemistry between the pair is zero. Natasha Sinha apes Ila Arun. The performance of the priest who sets the curse in motion deserves special mention.
On a whole "Shaapit" barely escapes being classified a B-grade flick.
PS: Nearly forgot, I am enlightened that a few centuries ago even the royal blood had a penchant for item songs!
Vikram Bhatt is a terrific storyteller. Right from 'Gunegaar' to his last film '1920', his work has made me a fan of his, so watching 'Shaapit' was a must.
The story of a girl who is trapped in a generational curse, which does not allow her love & marriage and her lover who vows to conquer this curse. Will she come over the curse? 'Shaapit' is a fantastic idea, and so is Bhatt's direction. But the writing falters, especially in the second hour. The climax also is embarrassing and leaves no impact. Anyways, it has it's share of eerie moments, which leave a impact.
Aditya Narayan makes a fine debut. Plus, he's a good singer. Shweta also does a fine job. Rahul Dev is fantastic in a supporting role. Others are adequate.
'Shaapit' is an average watch, but it's worth a watch for Bhatt's terrific direction and Rahul Dev's fantastic performance.
The story of a girl who is trapped in a generational curse, which does not allow her love & marriage and her lover who vows to conquer this curse. Will she come over the curse? 'Shaapit' is a fantastic idea, and so is Bhatt's direction. But the writing falters, especially in the second hour. The climax also is embarrassing and leaves no impact. Anyways, it has it's share of eerie moments, which leave a impact.
Aditya Narayan makes a fine debut. Plus, he's a good singer. Shweta also does a fine job. Rahul Dev is fantastic in a supporting role. Others are adequate.
'Shaapit' is an average watch, but it's worth a watch for Bhatt's terrific direction and Rahul Dev's fantastic performance.
Shaapit is not a bad movie idk what the audienecs want. The story is nice acting okay and direction fantastic. The atmosphere is spooky and unsettling. The execution is fine. But the way The King is portrayed is not very nice. The item song ruins it. The ending is childish. They did not give any time to design the ghost properly. But whatever when u warch the film u enjoy and u dont feel like u wasted 2 hrs. U enjoy it. I like it. Not a bad film. Worth watching one time. Surprised to know it was a flop.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesMurli Sharma played father's character for the first time.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe closing credits includes an illustration of photo collections of Aman and Kaya, living happily ever after and getting married.
- Trilhas sonorasAjnabi Hawaayein
Written by Sameer
Composed by Chirantan Bhatt
Performed by Shreya Ghoshal
Courtesy of Tips Cassettes & Records Co.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Shaapit: The Cursed?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 2.316.497
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 25 min(145 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente