A Nightmare in Las Cruces

(2011) A Nightmare In La Cruces DOCUMENTARY

Extremely conventional documentary involving a heinous massacre that has taken place during the year of 1990, involving two criminals breaking into a bowling alley with attempts to killing all witnesses. Out of seven shot, three survived. And that it's intentional purpose was to encourage someone or somebody to expose the perpetrators that did it, with many conspiracy theories about who and what assaillants was involved, including the owner of the bowling alley himself. What this documentary does is showcases the grief and pain that has struck upon this family and many other families, since that's all the filmmakers can do. No forensic tests or DNA but a heck of a lot of boring theories. We, the viewers are pining for any type of arrest but no it does neither.

The documentary begins in pitch black with the chilling 911 call made by 12 year old Melissa Repass, conscious after being shot five times. As she counts the bodies on the floor for the dispatcher, three of them children, you realize the murders at the Las Cruces Bowl in New Mexico are truly a nightmare. Minutes before the call, two men stole money from the safe and then shot seven people, execution style in their heads; the youngest of the victims, two year old Valerie Teran, who later died at the hospital. Miraculously, two others survived, Stephanie Senac and Ida Holguin. The cold-blooded killers have never been found.

The film includes interviews with detectives, the 911 dispatcher who took Melissa's call, the survivors, and the dead victims' families that will have grown men weeping. Midway, there is an attempt at detective work by questioning the owner of the bowling alley, Ronald Senac, who was out of town during the incident. It's a notable effort but the interviewer often stumbles over the questions - slightly annoying. A completely unnecessary part of the film is a short blurb of the director, Charlie Minn, and crew, which has some people questioning his motives.

At an hour and 43 minutes, the film stretches on an hour too long. A Nightmare in Las Cruces packs its punch in the first half hour. About mid-point, it starts losing steam and you can sense the desperate attempts to keep the filler going with questions aimed at evoking waterworks, at which point you're hopeful that the provocation ends soon. How long do these poor people need to be tortured? And are the questions being asked bringing anyone any closer to catching the monsters who looked a two year old baby in the eyes and then shot her in the forehead?

If you watch investigative shows like Dateline and 48 Hours, you'll like this documentary. It's an emotional roller coaster ride and, ultimately, there is no closure for the audience or the victims and victims' families. It's very depressing.