AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,7/10
1,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaCharlotte is a doctor in Brussels. She is married to the architect Max and has a young son. She rents an apartment to meet men, while maintaining an intimate marriage and family life.Charlotte is a doctor in Brussels. She is married to the architect Max and has a young son. She rents an apartment to meet men, while maintaining an intimate marriage and family life.Charlotte is a doctor in Brussels. She is married to the architect Max and has a young son. She rents an apartment to meet men, while maintaining an intimate marriage and family life.
- Prêmios
- 2 vitórias e 5 indicações no total
Avaliações em destaque
I had no idea what this movie would be about. But it played at the Berlin International Film Festival this year and the title sounded intriguing. Plus it did fit into my schedule. It really goes all the way and is pretty harsh and raw. While you never really get into the head of our main actress, she seems to bear it all. So this isn't for the delicate viewers amongst us.
Unfortunately it is not as good as I'd wish it would be. It tries very hard to be something poetic, something that will make you think about things. Philosophical even, if you want to call it that. And while it has really good points, it never achieves its goal.
Unfortunately it is not as good as I'd wish it would be. It tries very hard to be something poetic, something that will make you think about things. Philosophical even, if you want to call it that. And while it has really good points, it never achieves its goal.
Until I watched this film, I considered Marie Antoinette and Forrest Gump to be the two worst movies I had ever seen. Brownian Movement outdoes them.
I only watched it because the description said that to moved to India, my home country. Was curious why they would do that.
The movie has barely and plot AND it makes no sense. Charlotte is married to a very attractive man, as she acknowledges. She also has a good job. Yet, she chooses to hook up with only unattractive men and we don't have a clue why.
The therapy session is superficial. We get no sense of why Max stays with her and has children with her.
About half the movie is comprised of silences. Apparently, the writer and director could not bother to write some helpful dialogue.
PS Another reviewer says that this film manages to make nudity and sex boring. Actually, the top honor for that goes to Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.
I only watched it because the description said that to moved to India, my home country. Was curious why they would do that.
The movie has barely and plot AND it makes no sense. Charlotte is married to a very attractive man, as she acknowledges. She also has a good job. Yet, she chooses to hook up with only unattractive men and we don't have a clue why.
The therapy session is superficial. We get no sense of why Max stays with her and has children with her.
About half the movie is comprised of silences. Apparently, the writer and director could not bother to write some helpful dialogue.
PS Another reviewer says that this film manages to make nudity and sex boring. Actually, the top honor for that goes to Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut.
This movie is simply fantastic. Shots are incredibly beautiful with minimalist presentation. Delicate and sensitive. Loyal yet uncompromising. The moves by the protagonist are bold and way ahead of our times. Let's not be the arbiter of "morality" here. Passing judgement based on the male perspective of what the characters are expected to do or by the cultural standards that we have grown accustomed to or expect, is juvenile. If you are conditioned enough to look for messages in a movie then you are missing the forest.
Dull. Not a long movie, but it feels long. Just drifts from the first minute to the last, and ultimately goes nowhere.
Quite pointless.
Quite pointless.
The star's write up in the current New Yorker Magazine led me to this film. With all the predictable, derivative fare these days, it is a welcome relief. I lament all the panning user reviews, entirely missing the point.
Charlotte the brilliant research physician reminds one of the Good Doctor and Astrid Neilsen in her extraordinary professional abilities. But unlike them, she passes for neurotypical. Her relationship with her pre-school-age son is normal as apple pie.
The linguistic fragmentation of her daily life portends what will happen. She is German. She is married to an American. English is spoken at home and at work. Official stuff in Brussels is in French. The language of the streets is Flemish.
She has a crack-up, taking the form of sexual acting out with unattractive, Flemish-speaking men. The lurid sex scenes make the sheer perverseness vivid. She has encountered ugly bodies alive and dead in her time, after all. The sex is much like the drinking in Vício Maldito (1962). Only if those scenes are misunderstood out of context can one think this is mere soft-core porn.
Against all odds, her husband stands by her as the repercussions blow back. Perhaps he would not have done so, had she not been such a good lay. The moral of the story? When someone in your life experiences a crack-up, the right thing to do is be there for him/her.
While recovering, she gives birth to twins. The symbolism cannot get heavier-handed than that!
I think this film stands on the shoulders of Repulsa ao Sexo (1965) and A Bela da Tarde (1967).
Charlotte the brilliant research physician reminds one of the Good Doctor and Astrid Neilsen in her extraordinary professional abilities. But unlike them, she passes for neurotypical. Her relationship with her pre-school-age son is normal as apple pie.
The linguistic fragmentation of her daily life portends what will happen. She is German. She is married to an American. English is spoken at home and at work. Official stuff in Brussels is in French. The language of the streets is Flemish.
She has a crack-up, taking the form of sexual acting out with unattractive, Flemish-speaking men. The lurid sex scenes make the sheer perverseness vivid. She has encountered ugly bodies alive and dead in her time, after all. The sex is much like the drinking in Vício Maldito (1962). Only if those scenes are misunderstood out of context can one think this is mere soft-core porn.
Against all odds, her husband stands by her as the repercussions blow back. Perhaps he would not have done so, had she not been such a good lay. The moral of the story? When someone in your life experiences a crack-up, the right thing to do is be there for him/her.
While recovering, she gives birth to twins. The symbolism cannot get heavier-handed than that!
I think this film stands on the shoulders of Repulsa ao Sexo (1965) and A Bela da Tarde (1967).
Você sabia?
- ConexõesFeatured in Women Make Film: A New Road Movie Through Cinema (2018)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Brownian Movement?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 16.942
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 37 min(97 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente