Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaThe story of how a small arid town with no natural resources became a place of pilgrimage for three of the most prominent world religions, and how 3,000 years of conflicts have led directly ... Ler tudoThe story of how a small arid town with no natural resources became a place of pilgrimage for three of the most prominent world religions, and how 3,000 years of conflicts have led directly to the struggles of today.The story of how a small arid town with no natural resources became a place of pilgrimage for three of the most prominent world religions, and how 3,000 years of conflicts have led directly to the struggles of today.
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
Jews have been in Israel and Jerusalem for more than 5000 years. Why watch a hacked up version of history by a news channel that makes up entertaining stories and then presents them as news? People who don't know better will be duped for sure.
I've just seen the episode covering 1935-1948. Interesting that the key _Palestinian_ leader in this period, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hadj al-Amin al-Husseini, is never even mentioned. One Palestinian "scholar" went so far as to claim the Palestinians had no leadership representing them in 1947-1948. There was a reason for this. Al-Husseini was a Nazi. He led a violent three year rebellion against the British,1936-1939, which the British had to crush with the threat of Nazi Germany looming. This was dismissed in the show as the British suppressing Palestinian leadership and driving them into exile, without explanation. Al-Husseini fled to Iraq and helped organize another rebellion against the British (in wartime, with German support) which was also put down. Husseini then wound up in Berlin, appearing with Hitler, and helping raise Muslim troops for the Waffen-SS. I can see why the Arab leadership of 1947-48, the producers, and the Palestinians who apparently wrote this script, would want him out of the story, but he _was_ the Palestinian leader, and a violent anti-Semite, throughout the period. Instead, they created a straw man, Abdullah of Transjordan (later Jordan) as the Arab leader in opposition to the creation of Israel, because he wanted to hold Jerusalem for the Arabs. They did note, in a footnote, that he was assassinated in 1951 by "a Palestinian nationalist," without explanation. He was murdered because he was a moderate who accepted the outcome of the 1948-1949 war. But no mention of the man who was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem- what city is this series about, again?
Then there was the stress on Irgun terrorism, and the attempt, with two brief exceptions, to make it representative of the entire Zionist movement. No question they were terrorists, and Deir Yassin and the King David Hotel were terrorist acts, But did the Palestinians not commit these acts as well? Hebron, 1929, 60+ Jewish dead. How many dead in the slighted Arab rebellion of 1936-1939? Not a mention. Then there was Husseini again, putting a bounty on the head of his Palestinian political opponents, the Nashashibis. But that was probably too deep in the grass for a one hour show. Besides, Husseini doesn't exist, right?
Nor does the policy of both Husseini and the Arab High Committee to instruct Arab villagers to move their women and children out Palestine, leaving the young men behind to fight, first considered in 1946, a year and a half before Deir Yassin. Facts can be such a problem.
If you want a balanced, warts and all on both sides, account of this period. Take the time and read the books of Benny Morris. CNN has no credibility.
Then there was the stress on Irgun terrorism, and the attempt, with two brief exceptions, to make it representative of the entire Zionist movement. No question they were terrorists, and Deir Yassin and the King David Hotel were terrorist acts, But did the Palestinians not commit these acts as well? Hebron, 1929, 60+ Jewish dead. How many dead in the slighted Arab rebellion of 1936-1939? Not a mention. Then there was Husseini again, putting a bounty on the head of his Palestinian political opponents, the Nashashibis. But that was probably too deep in the grass for a one hour show. Besides, Husseini doesn't exist, right?
Nor does the policy of both Husseini and the Arab High Committee to instruct Arab villagers to move their women and children out Palestine, leaving the young men behind to fight, first considered in 1946, a year and a half before Deir Yassin. Facts can be such a problem.
If you want a balanced, warts and all on both sides, account of this period. Take the time and read the books of Benny Morris. CNN has no credibility.
More make believe dramatisation that historically accurate.
CNN lost points in by book.
CNN lost points in by book.
I applaud CNN for giving an honest and non biased accounting of the history of Jerusalem. It is important to point out that Israel has as much fault for the current violence that exists in the region.
I'm surprised by the reviews because I'm only on episode 1 and I am very interested. I am watching this to learn because I've always wondered what the story was. I have no formal knowledge regarding the history. Whether you agree or disagree on the facts, it's well laid out and I am able to follow along and understand, so I think this is great so far. I wish they would do more series in this format like the history of India!
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Jerusalem: City of Faith and Fury (2021) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda