Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaSisters Kate and Megan attend their local wedding fair they jokingly enter a dream wedding package even though they are not getting married. Surprise the sisters win and now must put on a sh... Ler tudoSisters Kate and Megan attend their local wedding fair they jokingly enter a dream wedding package even though they are not getting married. Surprise the sisters win and now must put on a show or be mortified by their champagne decisions.Sisters Kate and Megan attend their local wedding fair they jokingly enter a dream wedding package even though they are not getting married. Surprise the sisters win and now must put on a show or be mortified by their champagne decisions.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Geoff Shangh
- Paul Thompson
- (as Geoffrey Shangh)
AnnaMarie Lea
- Valerie Wilde
- (as Annamarie Frances Lea)
Roberta Mauer-Phillips
- Flower Lady
- (as Roberta Mauer Phillips)
Natalie Crystalle
- Trish
- (as Natalie Crystalle Ibgui)
Bud Klasky
- Wedding Guest
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
Everything, from the individual parts to the finished whole, is utter dreck. I'm astounded at how the two leads got roped into this mess. Each character is a one-dimensional caricature, none more so than the absolute grima that's the younger sister. She's a caricature of a caricature playing a caricature. Both sisters would give ditzy blondes a thousand-level boost in reputation. The gunk that passes for the plot is putrid to begin with, essentially caging the two sisters as unsympathetic, annoyingly entitled, shallow, opportunistic airheads. That the producer and director went with this and even pushed it further speaks not just volumes but an entire library. One that uses the Library of Congress system. What were they thinking? To even consider this a parody would be criminal. If this were a porn movie it would make a bit of sense, but it's supposed to be family fare. I'm actually giving this a double-digit negative score. 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻
I next to never write reviews for anything really. With that said, I feel like I owe it to mankind to warn them on this one. This movie from the get go, is horrifically stupid and poorly written. The plot is absolutely stupid, and the acting is terrible and there doesn't seem to be any chemistry between any of the cast. There's no music or anything to really try and help save some of the scenes. If this is what we can expect from Great American Family moving forward, we will no longer be viewers. Everyone is free to watch what they choose of course, but I'd suggest watching grass grow or paint dry before recommending anyone watch this train wreck of a movie!
Great America "Family"is anti-family. They seem to hire Hallmark writers who only know a few plots. As with most Hallmark movies, this one is based on a lie. Megan is getting married but enters her non-dating sister Kate in a Dream Wedding contest. Kate agrees to the lie so Megan can have fun. Before the first commercial break you will HATE Megan and despise Kate. The wedding vendors spend a lot of time and money to help Kate plan her fake wedding. This lie is hurtful to them. But I guess people don't matter to GAF. I'm sorry, but this is definitely not the way I want to raise my family. I don't care how it ends. A lie is a lie. Let's find a new family network.
Totally forgetful movie, no chemistry between actors,the worst premise for a GAC premiere movie.lying is not what I want to teach my family. We get enough of lying in the real world.this doesn't even qualify as entertainment. It seems they just threw a few hundred pages of movie script into the air and however they landed they picked them up, stacked them together and called it a family movie.the mr. Hines character is a buffoon, he doesn't suspect something is wrong when the sister always speaks for her. I will not recommend this movie to anyone unless it is late at night and they are having a hard time going to sleep.
.I will not recommend this movie to any.
.I will not recommend this movie to any.
Before I address the quality of the movie, I'd like to let Darlene-Steve know that you did NOT hear what you think. The only thing that comes close to that, and what you must have misheard, is when Jesse says, "You'd have a fake name, of course! Raoul Credenza." Get your mind out of the gutter! (I'm teasing you - but no, he said nothing shocking.)
This movie was a disappointment, but never have I seen a whole string of reviewers give a movie with Jesse Hutch a "1" rating. I may be awfully cynical, but I'm going to come right out and say it: Are a bunch of people from a rival channel on here giving a bunch of "1" reviews?? Just wondering.
As to the movie, itself, the plot is a little outlandish, the writing isn't the best, it's really too unrealistic - but this can apply to many of these romances. I'm wondering if it was the director. Some of the actors - especially the insufferable sister! - play their roles as if they were in a farce. ("Haul Out the Holly" actually was a farce and - if you understood what a farce is - it was wonderful, hilarious, and the over-the-top acting was a natural fit for that movie.)
Wedding Dreams, however, is not supposed to be a farce! Jesse is a splendid actor, and he seemed so subdued in this movie that I felt he was somewhat embarrassed. He probably knew it wasn't going well. The sister overacted terribly, and the actor playing Raoul did somewhat, as well. (Again, I question the direction.) I admit, the movie is especially hard to watch at first. It improves after the annoying sister disappears from the movie for a while.
This movie will never make the "A" list, and honestly it barely makes the "C" list (Okay, maybe a "D.") But a whole bunch of "1" ratings? That seems very strange. To put it in perspective, I usually rate a movie at least a 6, and often an 8 or more. I'm giving it a 5, and if I were in a worse mood than I am I might have gone for a 4. But a 1? I don't believe that's accurate or fair for this effort.
That said, it really won't hurt you if you skip this one, unless - as I do - you just love to watch Jesse Hutch perform in almost anything.
This movie was a disappointment, but never have I seen a whole string of reviewers give a movie with Jesse Hutch a "1" rating. I may be awfully cynical, but I'm going to come right out and say it: Are a bunch of people from a rival channel on here giving a bunch of "1" reviews?? Just wondering.
As to the movie, itself, the plot is a little outlandish, the writing isn't the best, it's really too unrealistic - but this can apply to many of these romances. I'm wondering if it was the director. Some of the actors - especially the insufferable sister! - play their roles as if they were in a farce. ("Haul Out the Holly" actually was a farce and - if you understood what a farce is - it was wonderful, hilarious, and the over-the-top acting was a natural fit for that movie.)
Wedding Dreams, however, is not supposed to be a farce! Jesse is a splendid actor, and he seemed so subdued in this movie that I felt he was somewhat embarrassed. He probably knew it wasn't going well. The sister overacted terribly, and the actor playing Raoul did somewhat, as well. (Again, I question the direction.) I admit, the movie is especially hard to watch at first. It improves after the annoying sister disappears from the movie for a while.
This movie will never make the "A" list, and honestly it barely makes the "C" list (Okay, maybe a "D.") But a whole bunch of "1" ratings? That seems very strange. To put it in perspective, I usually rate a movie at least a 6, and often an 8 or more. I'm giving it a 5, and if I were in a worse mood than I am I might have gone for a 4. But a 1? I don't believe that's accurate or fair for this effort.
That said, it really won't hurt you if you skip this one, unless - as I do - you just love to watch Jesse Hutch perform in almost anything.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Dream Wedding?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 29 min(89 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente