AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,6/10
5 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Após herdar misteriosamente uma propriedade costeira abandonada, Ben e sua família acidentalmente libertam uma criatura antiga e há muito adormecida que aterrorizou toda a região - incluindo... Ler tudoApós herdar misteriosamente uma propriedade costeira abandonada, Ben e sua família acidentalmente libertam uma criatura antiga e há muito adormecida que aterrorizou toda a região - incluindo seus próprios antepassados - por gerações.Após herdar misteriosamente uma propriedade costeira abandonada, Ben e sua família acidentalmente libertam uma criatura antiga e há muito adormecida que aterrorizou toda a região - incluindo seus próprios antepassados - por gerações.
Matt Whelan
- Ben
- (as Matthew Whelan)
Avaliações em destaque
If you survive the first 40 minutes or so (of introduction) without falling into Morpheus's gentle and comforting arms, you get a pretty standard "horror" flick with some monsters, lots of stupid decisions, in the end I rooted for the beasts. The Tank tries to be something like The Descent but can't compete on any level - production, story, thrill, acting, everything is inferior to The Descent. The premise of The Tank is not that bad, maybe even interesting, but the execution is, well, just boring. Recommendation: if you want to really waste some time (like I did), maybe with the notion that you are immortal and you have a lot of time to waste, put The Tank on your menu, if not, watch something else.
50/100 marks from me. Started off really well. Interesting concept and cinematography. But then just went the way of current Hollywood. The male character just incompetent and couldn't do anything, not even smart enough to ever bring a weapon or a knife with him to try and fight the creature. I did however enjoyed the score but wish my audio change editing was better.
That being said everything else was not great. Contrary to most of the other reviews I was actually kind of feeling the beginning, but the continuity in this film ruined the whole thing for me. Also I understand that people don't always make the best decisions in horror movies but god was this hard to watch during the climax.
The Tank had an interesting premise. The idea was semi-original. The setting was beautiful and creepy at the same time. Some decent tense moments. Overall, an ok scary movie to pass the time.
That being said everything else was not great. Contrary to most of the other reviews I was actually kind of feeling the beginning, but the continuity in this film ruined the whole thing for me. Also I understand that people don't always make the best decisions in horror movies but god was this hard to watch during the climax.
The Tank had an interesting premise. The idea was semi-original. The setting was beautiful and creepy at the same time. Some decent tense moments. Overall, an ok scary movie to pass the time.
It's not that The Tank is a completely horrible film.
The acting is rather decent.
The monster is kind of cool (at least it's not horribly rendered with CGI).
And it has a dark and foreboding atmosphere.
The basic premise here, is that a giant storm, in the distant past, washed a bunch of axolotls (or other such amphibious creatures) from the ocean, into the septic tank of a house in a remote community...causing them to mutate into carnivorous human-eating salamanders (or, possibly, reptiles)...as a result of their exposure to human excrement.
At least that is what is implied...I think.
However, it's rather hard to get around the ridiculous logic on which the story is based.
First and foremost, the way the father finds and enters the tank- which supposedly awakens/releases the beast- is absurd.
Literally noone goes to a new place...sees an overgrown grate...and is overcome with the curiosity to lift and enter it.
It's just not plausible, or believable.
And comes off completely forced.
Not to mention, axolotls don't even live in the ocean...and if they did get washed into a septic tank (by some freak course of nature)...that doesn't really meet the criteria of them becoming "land based" creatures.
On top of that...not only is the whole first half of the film incredibly basic...it's also rather boring.
With the introduction of characters (outside of the family) coming off as equally forced as the father entering the septic tank in the first place.
Plus, the way the monster first appears, also doesn't make any sense- as it seems to be some sort of supernatural force, as opposed to an actual flesh and blood creature.
I guess, if you can suspend disbelief- and ignore all the logical inconsistencies around which the story is based- you can garner some enjoyment from watching the film...despite it's mediocrity.
You just have to accept that it is all some sort of divine cosmic intervention, to bring karmic justice upon a family that dabbles in the trafficking of endangered species (for the purpose of the pet trade).
At least they put a little imagination into it...by taking some of the world's cutest creatures...and transforming them into terrifying monstrous beasts, hellbent on the destruction of humanity.
So...there's that, at least.
But I can't help but think that this was a completely avoidable situation.
3.5 out of 10.
The acting is rather decent.
The monster is kind of cool (at least it's not horribly rendered with CGI).
And it has a dark and foreboding atmosphere.
The basic premise here, is that a giant storm, in the distant past, washed a bunch of axolotls (or other such amphibious creatures) from the ocean, into the septic tank of a house in a remote community...causing them to mutate into carnivorous human-eating salamanders (or, possibly, reptiles)...as a result of their exposure to human excrement.
At least that is what is implied...I think.
However, it's rather hard to get around the ridiculous logic on which the story is based.
First and foremost, the way the father finds and enters the tank- which supposedly awakens/releases the beast- is absurd.
Literally noone goes to a new place...sees an overgrown grate...and is overcome with the curiosity to lift and enter it.
It's just not plausible, or believable.
And comes off completely forced.
Not to mention, axolotls don't even live in the ocean...and if they did get washed into a septic tank (by some freak course of nature)...that doesn't really meet the criteria of them becoming "land based" creatures.
On top of that...not only is the whole first half of the film incredibly basic...it's also rather boring.
With the introduction of characters (outside of the family) coming off as equally forced as the father entering the septic tank in the first place.
Plus, the way the monster first appears, also doesn't make any sense- as it seems to be some sort of supernatural force, as opposed to an actual flesh and blood creature.
I guess, if you can suspend disbelief- and ignore all the logical inconsistencies around which the story is based- you can garner some enjoyment from watching the film...despite it's mediocrity.
You just have to accept that it is all some sort of divine cosmic intervention, to bring karmic justice upon a family that dabbles in the trafficking of endangered species (for the purpose of the pet trade).
At least they put a little imagination into it...by taking some of the world's cutest creatures...and transforming them into terrifying monstrous beasts, hellbent on the destruction of humanity.
So...there's that, at least.
But I can't help but think that this was a completely avoidable situation.
3.5 out of 10.
How are movies like this still being made? Movies that offer absolutely nothing new or creative in any way. I get that there are only a finite amount of ideas for a story out there, but even if you're doing something that has been done before you can at least put your own spin on it. 'The Tank' is as bad as films get.
I don't want to be too harsh on this film, so I'll just list a few of the things I didn't like without going into too much detail. I thought the creatures weren't very impressive visually and they conveniently only attacked when it was necessary to the story. Otherwise they would just sit there making gargling sounds. Also the film puts a child right in the middle of the story who is extremely annoying and also guarantees the safety of certain characters. There is nothing that kills the tension in a horror movie more than kids.
The dialogue is bland and completely lacking in creativity, the movie doesn't know how to build tension in a scene, the setting isn't scary and the acting is poor. I did not like this film. A generous 2.5/10.
I don't want to be too harsh on this film, so I'll just list a few of the things I didn't like without going into too much detail. I thought the creatures weren't very impressive visually and they conveniently only attacked when it was necessary to the story. Otherwise they would just sit there making gargling sounds. Also the film puts a child right in the middle of the story who is extremely annoying and also guarantees the safety of certain characters. There is nothing that kills the tension in a horror movie more than kids.
The dialogue is bland and completely lacking in creativity, the movie doesn't know how to build tension in a scene, the setting isn't scary and the acting is poor. I did not like this film. A generous 2.5/10.
The news teased the viewers with an upcoming old school practical fx creature feature. Well, technically it is, but what we, monster movie fans, love about the genre is when you actually see the creature a lot. The Tank is terribly slow paced and only after one hour of dull conversations and flashbacks some limited action starts.
The monster: awfully generic and it's given a bit more screen time than in the trailers.
The writing: the plot is driven by dumb, absolutely illogical decisions of the characters.
True monster flicks fans will be disappointed.
If you're curious anyway, fast forward the first 60 min and don't expect much.
The monster: awfully generic and it's given a bit more screen time than in the trailers.
The writing: the plot is driven by dumb, absolutely illogical decisions of the characters.
True monster flicks fans will be disappointed.
If you're curious anyway, fast forward the first 60 min and don't expect much.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe creature effects were done practically.
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Jules spots the creature in the window, she only sees the top of its head, yet she describes it as having big claws and teeth, which she couldn't actually see.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Tank?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Щось
- Locações de filme
- Bethells Beach, Auckland, Nova Zelândia(Hobbit's Bay)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 86.378
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 40 min(100 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente