AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,7/10
8,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um olhar por trás dos anos de manchetes sensacionalistas para revelar a história privada da alegação de abuso sexual contra Woody Allen envolvendo sua filha de 7 anos e Mia Farrow.Um olhar por trás dos anos de manchetes sensacionalistas para revelar a história privada da alegação de abuso sexual contra Woody Allen envolvendo sua filha de 7 anos e Mia Farrow.Um olhar por trás dos anos de manchetes sensacionalistas para revelar a história privada da alegação de abuso sexual contra Woody Allen envolvendo sua filha de 7 anos e Mia Farrow.
- Indicado para 7 Primetime Emmys
- 16 indicações no total
Explorar episódios
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Allen v. Farrow' delves into the allegations against Woody Allen, highlighting Mia and Dylan Farrow's claims. It scrutinizes family dynamics, Allen's relationship with Soon-Yi Previn, and the sexual abuse allegations. The documentary uses interviews, videos, and documents to build its narrative. Critics claim it is biased due to Allen's absent perspective, whereas supporters commend it for amplifying victims' voices and uncovering alleged misconduct. It also discusses celebrity influence on public opinion and the legal system's case management.
Avaliações em destaque
This is a well-edited recount of the early days of a rather perverse plot. It's always been easy to criticize Mia Farrow for just assembling a huge family of children to care for, but that is less of a target here. The slow-burn of Allen's "inappropriate" behavior with selected children is intriguing...and you just want to know more. Why? Because it is downright weird. It's about time someone documented this story and let people make up their own minds. This is a good documentary.
I see many are saying this documentary is biased and presents only one side. Allen said his "truth" out loud back in the 90's when he attacked with all weapons, based on his money, connections and popularity. Nobody heard Farrow back then. So it is Farrow's turn to tell her story. I'm pleased she talked, so women become aware how dangerous narcissistic men can be.
Well made documentary and excellently told story. This needs to be seen by all.
I have seen the hole series and I found it to be shockingly truthful. It is visually beautiful and well edited, even if it is so heartbreaking. Dick and Ziering build up a strong piece with new never shown material, footage and recorded phone calls, combined with interviews with prosecutors, witnesses and child psychologists. They don't choose the truth, it was out there and they grabbed for i, cause it cannot be ignored anymore.
This is a story about a horrible family tragedy, but it is also a story of our culture, and the context we live in, a context that lets powerful men off the hook. It's about lack of justice and what part media plays in it.
In the core, how ever, is a little girl who was stolen of her innocence and childhood, who was not heard or believed. This little girl is a grown woman now, and it's time to listen to her.
I found Mia Farrow's story, and more importantly, her daughter Dylan's account of what happened in this case, to be totally credible and believable. Hard to call it a hatchet job when Mr .Allen declined to be interviewed. Woody Allen belongs behind bars IMO.
I have watched every single bit of stuff that is around, I've read Woddy's book, I've watched this documentary, and watched many videos on YT.
There are several things that I disliked a lot in this documentary: Hiding very important details of pro-Allen people and stuff that happened, and is proven (like the letter she sent to Woody with nails on it and such weird stuff). Makes this documentary absolutely untrustworthy... it it wasn't before watching it.
Also, add to it the "movie like" sad moments, playing with the viewer feelings, make it look like a very subjective and very "sentimental" and not a serious documentary.
Adding some images that we have never seen and the taped conversations is really interesting. I didn't like that all of them are edited or cut right before an answer was heard or a part of it was needed! So when listening to the excerpts seems like the audio has been edited heavily and hidden important details.
I would suggest the viewers to now watch some other stuff not made by Allen or the Farrows. Now watch a documentary on YT made by somebody who spend a lot of time researching too, called "By the way, Woody Allen is inocent" for a deep dive on all the details and reasoning of both sides, independently of your opinion, forget the title. It comments the stuff seen in this documentary as well as Allen's book and much more.
It is way more objetive than any other thing, I think.
Anyway, I'm not convinced at all, nor by this or Woddy's version, but this one feels bad, really bad, really biased.
I still watch W. A. movies and enjoy them as a work of art the same way we can enjoy a painting by Picasso without knowing stuff he did in his private life, I can have an opinion, but that's all I can do. On the other side, I feel like Dylan, whatever is the real version, is really broken, so it's too late for her to really know if that was really what happened or not, things stick forever and they will.
There are several things that I disliked a lot in this documentary: Hiding very important details of pro-Allen people and stuff that happened, and is proven (like the letter she sent to Woody with nails on it and such weird stuff). Makes this documentary absolutely untrustworthy... it it wasn't before watching it.
Also, add to it the "movie like" sad moments, playing with the viewer feelings, make it look like a very subjective and very "sentimental" and not a serious documentary.
Adding some images that we have never seen and the taped conversations is really interesting. I didn't like that all of them are edited or cut right before an answer was heard or a part of it was needed! So when listening to the excerpts seems like the audio has been edited heavily and hidden important details.
I would suggest the viewers to now watch some other stuff not made by Allen or the Farrows. Now watch a documentary on YT made by somebody who spend a lot of time researching too, called "By the way, Woody Allen is inocent" for a deep dive on all the details and reasoning of both sides, independently of your opinion, forget the title. It comments the stuff seen in this documentary as well as Allen's book and much more.
It is way more objetive than any other thing, I think.
Anyway, I'm not convinced at all, nor by this or Woddy's version, but this one feels bad, really bad, really biased.
I still watch W. A. movies and enjoy them as a work of art the same way we can enjoy a painting by Picasso without knowing stuff he did in his private life, I can have an opinion, but that's all I can do. On the other side, I feel like Dylan, whatever is the real version, is really broken, so it's too late for her to really know if that was really what happened or not, things stick forever and they will.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesAlthough Woody Allen did not respond to requests for interviews, his voice can be heard in the excerpts from the audio version of his autobiography, which he read. The publisher, Skyhorse Publishing, took exception to the inclusion of portions of the audio book and threatened to sue; the producers claimed the use of the book fell under "fair use" guidelines. Allen is also seen and heard, of course, through archive material, including home movies, his own films, and tape-recorded phone conversations.
- ConexõesFeatured in Entertainment Tonight Canada: Episode dated 22 February 2021 (2021)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Allen v. Farrow
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente