AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,5/10
1,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA family man, hoping to prove his survivalist capabilities and manliness to his family, decides to irresponsibly head off into the woods and go deer hunting by himself.A family man, hoping to prove his survivalist capabilities and manliness to his family, decides to irresponsibly head off into the woods and go deer hunting by himself.A family man, hoping to prove his survivalist capabilities and manliness to his family, decides to irresponsibly head off into the woods and go deer hunting by himself.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 4 indicações no total
Michael Raymond-James
- Lone Wolf
- (as Michael Raymond James)
Charline St. Charles
- Francine
- (as Charline St Charles)
Avaliações em destaque
Insurance Salesman Joe decides to champion his inner Bear Grylls and challenge his surgical skills in the wild. Armed with a rifle, he aims to shoot a deer.
This surprised me somewhat, I rather enjoyed it, a story of foolishness and trying to prove a point. It doesn't go as I expected, which is in its favour. Pacing has been pointed out by several as an issue, but if argue it's purposefully slow, feeling as though it was done in real time, it doesn't lurch from one action scene to the next. Efforts were made to make the film seem realistic.
A film about masculinity, it actually made for something of a change to the recent films I've seen, where masculinity is simply deemed bad, here it does at least explore and question it.
Considering Clayne Crawford does most of the film solo, he does a pretty fine job, a good performance.
Overall, this was much better than I expected.
7/10.
This surprised me somewhat, I rather enjoyed it, a story of foolishness and trying to prove a point. It doesn't go as I expected, which is in its favour. Pacing has been pointed out by several as an issue, but if argue it's purposefully slow, feeling as though it was done in real time, it doesn't lurch from one action scene to the next. Efforts were made to make the film seem realistic.
A film about masculinity, it actually made for something of a change to the recent films I've seen, where masculinity is simply deemed bad, here it does at least explore and question it.
Considering Clayne Crawford does most of the film solo, he does a pretty fine job, a good performance.
Overall, this was much better than I expected.
7/10.
Joseph Chambers sells insurance for a living and he apparently makes a good living doing so. He is seen at the start of the story dressing up for a solo hunting adventure, much to the displeasure of his wife. Against her wise advice, the city slicker borrows a deer rifle from a friend for his first expedition.
His trek eventually turns out badly and the second half of the movie has Joseph making a few important decisions.
His future is dependent upon what moral choices he will ultimately make. Clayne Crawford is on screen alone for most of the film and he is excellent as Joseph Chambers. Will he or won't he do what is right?
His trek eventually turns out badly and the second half of the movie has Joseph making a few important decisions.
His future is dependent upon what moral choices he will ultimately make. Clayne Crawford is on screen alone for most of the film and he is excellent as Joseph Chambers. Will he or won't he do what is right?
As I was watching this film, it wasn't long into it, that I start noticing the stupidity of the characters. I suppose that in itself is entertaining, but usually it's more frustrating and maddening. This film definitely doesn't lead you into laughing about the ridiculousness of stupidity either.
I asked myself WHY I continued to watch this movie....clear up to the last 15 minutes. And that is when it became clear.
Then the ending left me with different questions.
I like that!!
I bet many people will not understand or like this movie. I'm not sure I understand it....
All I can say is I liked it. It made me think and feel.
I asked myself WHY I continued to watch this movie....clear up to the last 15 minutes. And that is when it became clear.
Then the ending left me with different questions.
I like that!!
I bet many people will not understand or like this movie. I'm not sure I understand it....
All I can say is I liked it. It made me think and feel.
I am rarely this negative on a movie, but the fact that all those reviews that gave this a great rating got me suckered into wasting my time watching this...? Don't be fooled like I was!
This movie simply is not working h the time it takes to watch. It is one of the SLOWEST moving movies that I have ever seen! And it's not like a "Good" slow, either. You know, the kinda that actually rewards your anticipation with a great scene. Nope. This movie is literally filled with scenes that drag on, and on, and on, and on... and the fact that there is hardly ANY dialogue going on in this movie only makes these scenes MORE brutal! It truly feels like the film maker was just trying to fill in a bunch of "dead time" to make this movie as long as it is. Because honestly, this story could have been told 20-30 minutes.
What an utter waste of time. Don't bother!
This movie simply is not working h the time it takes to watch. It is one of the SLOWEST moving movies that I have ever seen! And it's not like a "Good" slow, either. You know, the kinda that actually rewards your anticipation with a great scene. Nope. This movie is literally filled with scenes that drag on, and on, and on, and on... and the fact that there is hardly ANY dialogue going on in this movie only makes these scenes MORE brutal! It truly feels like the film maker was just trying to fill in a bunch of "dead time" to make this movie as long as it is. Because honestly, this story could have been told 20-30 minutes.
What an utter waste of time. Don't bother!
Yet another covid movie with few actors and constant navel inspection. These movies should come with a 'dont bother' warning. As you sit waiting for something to happen you wonder how come the star doesnt get lost which is typical of in the woods scenarios. How come this and that without giving too much away. HOWEVER the real audience insult is the non ending where you rise from your chair and swear at the tv for wasting those minutes from your life you wont get back. Some Directors think this is 'arty' or forced thought provoking but in this case it needed a conclusion. As society no longer automatically rewards the good and virtuous and if happy to punish the innocent this was one movie that badly needed a conclusion. If time is a consideration cut out all the aimless wandering and give us a result.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesClayne Crawford and Jordana Brewster previously worked together on the tv series Lethal Weapon (2016)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Integrity of Joseph Chambers?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Integrity of Joseph Chambers
- Locações de filme
- Clay, Alabama, EUA(Wooded area)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 5.206
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 36 min(96 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente