Para cada psicopata há sinais. Revendo alguns dos assassinos mais perigosos da história moderna para ver que traços psicopáticos exibiam. Com imagens de arquivo reais.Para cada psicopata há sinais. Revendo alguns dos assassinos mais perigosos da história moderna para ver que traços psicopáticos exibiam. Com imagens de arquivo reais.Para cada psicopata há sinais. Revendo alguns dos assassinos mais perigosos da história moderna para ver que traços psicopáticos exibiam. Com imagens de arquivo reais.
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
The so called experts present little insight into the subject matter and fail to offer any real science-based evidence that would identify the featured defendants as psychopathic. At the most their crimes and actions show some sociopathic tendencies or personality disorders but nothing rising to the level of the misleading title.
No doubt, this is a great show if you are looking for getting some insights of psychopath. However, it makes me sick even though there is no brutal graphical description in the show. I'm sick of their callousness and the way they justified themselves.
I'm a big fan of crime shows, but, I really don't wanna see this show again at the same time. Big relief that I can't understand any of their behavior.
I'm a big fan of crime shows, but, I really don't wanna see this show again at the same time. Big relief that I can't understand any of their behavior.
The most interesting parts of this series are the interrogation clips. Most of them using outdated and non scientific interrogation techniques.
A set of experts try to explain how every suspect in the series are psycopats, only based on transcripts and interrogations audio/video. Even if the experts sometimes agree that the suspects only have a degree of psycopathic behavior, the series miss an opposing view, with someone like professor Gisli Gudjonson and his work on false confessions and interrogations.
False confessions and interrogation methods would be another great tv series if you are more into documentaries based on facts than entertainment.
A set of experts try to explain how every suspect in the series are psycopats, only based on transcripts and interrogations audio/video. Even if the experts sometimes agree that the suspects only have a degree of psycopathic behavior, the series miss an opposing view, with someone like professor Gisli Gudjonson and his work on false confessions and interrogations.
False confessions and interrogation methods would be another great tv series if you are more into documentaries based on facts than entertainment.
What helps this show stand out from all of the other true crime shows out there is the honest sometimes shocking "diagnosis" the doctors give us as the crimes of the psychopath unfold. The show portrays the crimes of a psychopath while it cuts to various doctors who explain the reasoning behind the act. While the doctors may give insight into the crime there's really no understanding them. After all, can anyone, other than another psychopath, understand the reasoning behind the crimes of the psychopath? But the doctors really give that insight in terms that we all can understand. The only negative I can think of is that they sometimes don't go deep enough into some of the criminals portrayed. I'd love to see an hour long episode on some of the criminals.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does Signs of a Psychopath have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Signs of a Psychopath
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração30 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Sinais de um Psicopata (2020) officially released in India in English?
Responda