AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,5/10
2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAn FBI Agent is hot on the tracks of Frédéric Fortin who has taken up the identity of a woman's long lost son, completely convincing the police and the boy's family of his identity.An FBI Agent is hot on the tracks of Frédéric Fortin who has taken up the identity of a woman's long lost son, completely convincing the police and the boy's family of his identity.An FBI Agent is hot on the tracks of Frédéric Fortin who has taken up the identity of a woman's long lost son, completely convincing the police and the boy's family of his identity.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Ritchie Montgomery
- Diner Owner
- (as Ritchie Montgomerey)
Lance E. Nichols
- FBI Doctor
- (as Lance Nichols)
Lindsay Soileau
- Girl #1
- (as Lindsey Soileau)
Katy Peppard
- Girl #2
- (as Katy Preppard)
Gio March
- Spanish Policeman
- (as a different name)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
I decided not to mark this review for possible spoilers, since this movie is about a true story and therefore most people who are interested in seeing it will already know how it ends. Besides, several previous reviews tell more than I will about the end, and they got through without spoiler warnings.
First off, it's ridiculous to praise Ellen Barkin's acting just because she's practically unrecognizable: that's called makeup, not acting. Maybe she should be commended for allowing herself to look so awful, but she never was much in the looks department either. The best I can say is that she doesn't ruin this movie as she has some others. Her one-note performance certainly is unusual, but unusual doesn't necessarily mean great.
Second, the problem with movies based on true stories is that if the story isn't interesting the movie usually isn't interesting either. At first I wondered why I had never heard of any of these people before, under any names, and now I know why: there's nothing interesting about them - not the screwed-up, depressed family and not the neurotic, narcissistic bozo who duped them.
Famke Janssen adds a little bit of interest just because she's a charismatic person, but that plus Barkin's mousy, greasy, depressed, anorexic chain-smoking junkie are not enough to sustain a very boring story about very boring people.
First off, it's ridiculous to praise Ellen Barkin's acting just because she's practically unrecognizable: that's called makeup, not acting. Maybe she should be commended for allowing herself to look so awful, but she never was much in the looks department either. The best I can say is that she doesn't ruin this movie as she has some others. Her one-note performance certainly is unusual, but unusual doesn't necessarily mean great.
Second, the problem with movies based on true stories is that if the story isn't interesting the movie usually isn't interesting either. At first I wondered why I had never heard of any of these people before, under any names, and now I know why: there's nothing interesting about them - not the screwed-up, depressed family and not the neurotic, narcissistic bozo who duped them.
Famke Janssen adds a little bit of interest just because she's a charismatic person, but that plus Barkin's mousy, greasy, depressed, anorexic chain-smoking junkie are not enough to sustain a very boring story about very boring people.
What can you say about a film with multiple producers from different cultures and with diverse points of view, who finally mutilated it to accommodate their interests? Obviously, Canadians, French and Americans do not have the same notion of cinema. The "globalized entrepreneurs" apparently did and, in this case, "won." It's no wonder director Jean-Paul Salomé claims that the film was altered from its original conception.
This is neither a detective film, nor a crime thriller. It is a drama about identity, about deprivation of love, about moralistic justice, which illustrates the damage done to all children abandoned by parents who, to begin with, should never have had them. Based on real events, "The Chameleon" adapts a chapter in the life of Frédéric Bourdin, a French citizen abandoned by his Algerian father and French mother, nicknamed Chameleon by the press, for his notorious adoption of hundreds of false identities in various European countries, and for sneaking into several homes, posing as a missing relative. It was proven that there was no sexual deviation or economic motive in his actions: he was only looking for affection.
However, Frédéric had the bad idea of posing as a missing Texan teenager. This is how he managed to be "repatriated" to the United States, to be accommodated by the child's dysfunctional family (in the film, a proletarian, violent, heroin-addicted brother and mother, plus a sister who denies the truth), and that television and the police would doubt his identity, until they identified him and put him through a "moralizing" trial, in which he was given six years in prison, instead of the three established by law in such a case.
According to the tone and treatment of the filmed material, Salomé (director of "Belphegor", "Arsene Lupine" and "La daronne") and his co-screenwriter Natalie Carter had the purpose of observing and analyzing the events. Then the editor Toby Yates (son of Peter Yates, director of the action thriller "Bullitt") came on the scene and reissued the movie, so we do not know what the original 106-minute proposal was.
However, with everything that could be argued against it, I saw an honest and moving film, slow and inquisitive, with good performances from the cast. Not everything has to be extraordinary or Hollywood-style. The world is wide and open, the intimate or public exposition of human drama varies according to cultures and its appreciation is suitable for many readings and interpretations.
This is neither a detective film, nor a crime thriller. It is a drama about identity, about deprivation of love, about moralistic justice, which illustrates the damage done to all children abandoned by parents who, to begin with, should never have had them. Based on real events, "The Chameleon" adapts a chapter in the life of Frédéric Bourdin, a French citizen abandoned by his Algerian father and French mother, nicknamed Chameleon by the press, for his notorious adoption of hundreds of false identities in various European countries, and for sneaking into several homes, posing as a missing relative. It was proven that there was no sexual deviation or economic motive in his actions: he was only looking for affection.
However, Frédéric had the bad idea of posing as a missing Texan teenager. This is how he managed to be "repatriated" to the United States, to be accommodated by the child's dysfunctional family (in the film, a proletarian, violent, heroin-addicted brother and mother, plus a sister who denies the truth), and that television and the police would doubt his identity, until they identified him and put him through a "moralizing" trial, in which he was given six years in prison, instead of the three established by law in such a case.
According to the tone and treatment of the filmed material, Salomé (director of "Belphegor", "Arsene Lupine" and "La daronne") and his co-screenwriter Natalie Carter had the purpose of observing and analyzing the events. Then the editor Toby Yates (son of Peter Yates, director of the action thriller "Bullitt") came on the scene and reissued the movie, so we do not know what the original 106-minute proposal was.
However, with everything that could be argued against it, I saw an honest and moving film, slow and inquisitive, with good performances from the cast. Not everything has to be extraordinary or Hollywood-style. The world is wide and open, the intimate or public exposition of human drama varies according to cultures and its appreciation is suitable for many readings and interpretations.
"The Chameleon" is roughly based on the case of the disappearance of Nicholas Barclay, and the impostor Frederic Bourdin.
The movie stays reasonably close to the facts, though there are some mayor things changed that IMO was totally unnecessary. At the same time, more could have been done with other things. I am on purpose gonna keep this all pretty vague; as I do not want to spoil anything. If you want to know about the real case, google on it. It is a very interesting thing to do.
I would definitely have liked to have seen more background about Frederic. The case of Nicholas wasn't the first time he imposed as a missing child, neither was it the last time. As if the whole story about Nicholas wasn't bizarre enough, it gets more and more bizarre if you read up on Bourdin. He truly deserves the name Chameleon; it is incredible how good this guy is at languages and in blending in. I do understand that the movie's focus was on only one of his crimes, but I think a bit more history would have made it all even more absurd. Now, you almost feel at least a bit pity for Bourdin, but that should not happen. After all, the guy was/is a very disturbed man who didn't give a *beep* about the feelings of his victims.
The overall acting was not very good. Famke Janssen made the best of it and steals the scenes when she comes in, but I was unfortunately pretty unconvinced by the lead character. The way the story unfolds was just not good enough to convince, and the characters way too shallow. Many things are there in potential, but somehow it just doesn't work. It could have been an 'edge of your seat' thriller or drama, but it simply isn't. Throughout the whole story, it just lacks something. An other reviewer used the word 'dull', and I think that's quite a good description.
All in all; an intriguing case made to a less intriguing movie.
(Ps: An interesting little fact; Bourdin himself worked as a creative consultant for this movie. )
The movie stays reasonably close to the facts, though there are some mayor things changed that IMO was totally unnecessary. At the same time, more could have been done with other things. I am on purpose gonna keep this all pretty vague; as I do not want to spoil anything. If you want to know about the real case, google on it. It is a very interesting thing to do.
I would definitely have liked to have seen more background about Frederic. The case of Nicholas wasn't the first time he imposed as a missing child, neither was it the last time. As if the whole story about Nicholas wasn't bizarre enough, it gets more and more bizarre if you read up on Bourdin. He truly deserves the name Chameleon; it is incredible how good this guy is at languages and in blending in. I do understand that the movie's focus was on only one of his crimes, but I think a bit more history would have made it all even more absurd. Now, you almost feel at least a bit pity for Bourdin, but that should not happen. After all, the guy was/is a very disturbed man who didn't give a *beep* about the feelings of his victims.
The overall acting was not very good. Famke Janssen made the best of it and steals the scenes when she comes in, but I was unfortunately pretty unconvinced by the lead character. The way the story unfolds was just not good enough to convince, and the characters way too shallow. Many things are there in potential, but somehow it just doesn't work. It could have been an 'edge of your seat' thriller or drama, but it simply isn't. Throughout the whole story, it just lacks something. An other reviewer used the word 'dull', and I think that's quite a good description.
All in all; an intriguing case made to a less intriguing movie.
(Ps: An interesting little fact; Bourdin himself worked as a creative consultant for this movie. )
When the fiction is more unsatisfying than the real life, then you're in a big trouble. "The Chameleon" is a weak film because it fails to generate interest in a real life story that has all the elements that could make into a great project. The director made questions he couldn't answer and we couldn't figure out possible reasons for all what happened in the events surrounding a young French (Marc-André Grondin) who claims to be the disappeared son of a poor American family, "returning" to his home after being kidnapped and taken to Europe. The problem is that it's obvious that some members of the family know that this French accented guy can't be Nicky, but they continue with this game until an FBI agent (Famke Janssen) get suspicious about this sudden reappearance.
Its cheap insistence in creating a mystery bigger than the one existing just doesn't work, with the skeletons in the family's closet with people who knew about the kid's real fate, like his older brother (Nick Stahl). And we are easily bothered by the lack of choices, lack of ways for the story to move in a proper manner. A movie like this can't dwell in the psychology involving the main character, therefore we'll never understand the reasoning behind the boy's staying with people who don't care about him. Why the hell he'd trade his erroneous life in France by shooting in the dark with a strange and careless American family, or why he didn't run away from this family he adopted, a bunch of people who wouldn't provide for him with anything? He's not getting much by staying there, no indicative that he's winning something.
The cast tries a little bit harder than what the script can offer to them make something worthy of our attention. Grondin is a fine actor as evidenced in "C.R.A.Z.Y." but here there's only glimpses of that actor, his duality of angelical innocence with some darker traits is relatively good; Janssen was pretty decent and the more her character progress the more we like her, same goes with Emile De Ravin and Brian Geraghty, doing their best; Ellen Barkin was distractive while trying to be exceptional as the mother.
As a drama, it's not as compelling as the plot sounds and could be; as a thriller is just dull and worthless. Bits of decent acting aren't enough to make it tolerable or watchable. 4/10
Its cheap insistence in creating a mystery bigger than the one existing just doesn't work, with the skeletons in the family's closet with people who knew about the kid's real fate, like his older brother (Nick Stahl). And we are easily bothered by the lack of choices, lack of ways for the story to move in a proper manner. A movie like this can't dwell in the psychology involving the main character, therefore we'll never understand the reasoning behind the boy's staying with people who don't care about him. Why the hell he'd trade his erroneous life in France by shooting in the dark with a strange and careless American family, or why he didn't run away from this family he adopted, a bunch of people who wouldn't provide for him with anything? He's not getting much by staying there, no indicative that he's winning something.
The cast tries a little bit harder than what the script can offer to them make something worthy of our attention. Grondin is a fine actor as evidenced in "C.R.A.Z.Y." but here there's only glimpses of that actor, his duality of angelical innocence with some darker traits is relatively good; Janssen was pretty decent and the more her character progress the more we like her, same goes with Emile De Ravin and Brian Geraghty, doing their best; Ellen Barkin was distractive while trying to be exceptional as the mother.
As a drama, it's not as compelling as the plot sounds and could be; as a thriller is just dull and worthless. Bits of decent acting aren't enough to make it tolerable or watchable. 4/10
I enjoyed it. The acting was solid. The story kept me intrigued. The actual case was very interesting.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesLoosely based on the story of Frédéric Bourdin, a French serial impostor nicknamed "The Chameleon" by the press. In 1997 Bourdin claimed to be Nicholas Barclay, a Texas native that disappeared 3 years earlier. Although Bourdin had brown eyes and a French accent, he convinced the family he was their blue-eyed son, saying he had escaped from a child prostitution ring. Bourdin lived with the family for almost 5 months until March 6, 1998. In late 1997 a local private investigator grew suspicious while working with a TV crew that had been filming the family. In February 1998 the FBI got a court order to take the young man's fingerprints and DNA, which later identified him as Bourdin. In September 1998, Bourdin pleaded guilty to passport fraud and perjury in a San Antonio federal court. He was imprisoned for six years.
- Erros de gravação(at around 33 mins) Brendan Kerrigan (Nick Stahl) is driving a burgundy colored Camaro with a spoiler on the trunk, and (at around 18 mins) he is clearly driving a burgundy colored Trans Am with no spoiler.
- Citações
Kimberly Miller: I was never a very good mother to you. I guess you forgot that too, huh?
- ConexõesReferences Michael Jackson: Thriller (1983)
- Trilhas sonorasCause and Effect
Written by Simon Steadman and Nicholas Jonathan Tyler
Performed by Pet Robot
Produced by by Simon Steadman and Nicholas Jonathan Tyler
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Chameleon?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Хамелеон
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 141.816
- Tempo de duração1 hora 46 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was The Chameleon (2010) officially released in India in English?
Responda