AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,3/10
12 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Em Londres, uma cineasta premiada documenta a viagem do seu melhor amigo para um casamento assistido, de acordo com a herança paquistanesa da família dele. No processo, ela desafia a sua pró... Ler tudoEm Londres, uma cineasta premiada documenta a viagem do seu melhor amigo para um casamento assistido, de acordo com a herança paquistanesa da família dele. No processo, ela desafia a sua própria atitude em relação às relações.Em Londres, uma cineasta premiada documenta a viagem do seu melhor amigo para um casamento assistido, de acordo com a herança paquistanesa da família dele. No processo, ela desafia a sua própria atitude em relação às relações.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Daniel Cook
- Spittle Mouth
- (as Dan Jarratt-Cook)
Avaliações em destaque
Filmed in London and in Pakistan. Lily James is the lead as documentary filmmaker Zoe Stevenson. She is in her 30s, does not have a serious relationship, and her mother (Emma Thompson) keeps dropping hints. She even tries her hand as a matchmaker, focusing on the nice, good-looking, age-appropriate Vet that cares for her dog.
Her good friend from childhood, growing up next door to each other in London, is Shazad Latif as Kaz Khan, a Physician. He is British of Pakistani heritage and his mom, dad, and old grandma also live there. His biological clock is ticking too and he decides to try the old-world method, a semi-arranged marriage. Much of the movie takes place in Pakistan as they all travel there for the wedding. And Zoe uses the occasion to film (digitally, of course) her next project.
The script writer as a 20-something lived and had her children in Pakistan for 10 years so she got to know the culture very well, and wanted this story to show some of the lesser known aspects of that culture. And, to explore some cross-culture issues.
There are a few very negative reviews here, along with some "1" or "2" votes. Now, having actually watched and enjoyed the movie along with my wife, I consider them all bogus. In fact it seems that some may not have actually watched the movie but somehow objected to the themes.
Good movie, meaningful and entertaining, at home on DVD from our public library.
Her good friend from childhood, growing up next door to each other in London, is Shazad Latif as Kaz Khan, a Physician. He is British of Pakistani heritage and his mom, dad, and old grandma also live there. His biological clock is ticking too and he decides to try the old-world method, a semi-arranged marriage. Much of the movie takes place in Pakistan as they all travel there for the wedding. And Zoe uses the occasion to film (digitally, of course) her next project.
The script writer as a 20-something lived and had her children in Pakistan for 10 years so she got to know the culture very well, and wanted this story to show some of the lesser known aspects of that culture. And, to explore some cross-culture issues.
There are a few very negative reviews here, along with some "1" or "2" votes. Now, having actually watched and enjoyed the movie along with my wife, I consider them all bogus. In fact it seems that some may not have actually watched the movie but somehow objected to the themes.
Good movie, meaningful and entertaining, at home on DVD from our public library.
I don't know what studio marketing "genius" came up with the generic title of this 2022 cross-cultural romcom, but I really thought it was going to evoke Tina Turner's song somehow. But no, it was meant to present the veracity of arranged marriages within the context of a burgeoning love story that's obvious to everyone except the two leads. Lily James plays Zoe, a documentary filmmaker who convinces her neighbor Kaz (Shazad Latif) to film his wedding process once he decides to go through with a traditional Pakistani arranged courtship. Of course, neither admits any feelings either may have for each other. As contrived as the concept sounds, director Shekhar Kapur manages to provide some intriguing insights into cultural customs that don't come across as condescending. As Zoe's pixilated mother, Emma Thompson seems wrongfully wasted even though she appears game for the inevitable shenanigans. However, if you're looking for something frothy with an exotic South Asian flavor, this might work for you. Actually Zoe came up with the best title for this movie: "Love Contractually".
There are good things about this film. See it if you are looking for a light-hearted experience.
It shows some good parts of "assisted" marriage very well, while also acknowledging how these traditional practices are coming under stress by modern culture.
A BULLSEYE.
The line " .. it must start with a simmer .." is just beautiful.
Another BULLSEYE.
They started showing how the positive aspects of "assisted" partnering can be hugely beneficial in "Western" culture.
Another BULLSEYE.
I like the way the female character was portrayed as someone who chases career and recognition above all else, then suddenly looks at her life, and her thoughts go to other things. Something (I think) that resonates with much of modern western society.
Another BULLSEYE.
So the movie started to take me down a deep and sensitive path about relationships, family pressures and expectations, the clash of cultures, acceptance, risk and courage. The underlying concept that people will "grow into Love" ... as heralded by the title ... made me expect a particular kind of movie. Then it changed.
They took a "stock standard" turn and cover everything in sugar syrup, whipped cream and choc sprinkles that completely overturns the whole build up. A school child could have written the last 20 mins.
. Many people will love this film, and there are some really good parts. It opens a door of great possibility with potential riches of emotion, cultural stresses and conflict, and just takes a little peek inside.
I would love someone to make a movie where this door is thrown open with abandon. Until then, enjoy this little Rom-Com.
It shows some good parts of "assisted" marriage very well, while also acknowledging how these traditional practices are coming under stress by modern culture.
A BULLSEYE.
The line " .. it must start with a simmer .." is just beautiful.
Another BULLSEYE.
They started showing how the positive aspects of "assisted" partnering can be hugely beneficial in "Western" culture.
Another BULLSEYE.
I like the way the female character was portrayed as someone who chases career and recognition above all else, then suddenly looks at her life, and her thoughts go to other things. Something (I think) that resonates with much of modern western society.
Another BULLSEYE.
So the movie started to take me down a deep and sensitive path about relationships, family pressures and expectations, the clash of cultures, acceptance, risk and courage. The underlying concept that people will "grow into Love" ... as heralded by the title ... made me expect a particular kind of movie. Then it changed.
They took a "stock standard" turn and cover everything in sugar syrup, whipped cream and choc sprinkles that completely overturns the whole build up. A school child could have written the last 20 mins.
. Many people will love this film, and there are some really good parts. It opens a door of great possibility with potential riches of emotion, cultural stresses and conflict, and just takes a little peek inside.
I would love someone to make a movie where this door is thrown open with abandon. Until then, enjoy this little Rom-Com.
What's Love Got To Do With It!
I liked the initial idea, however to make drama you need to compress reality and here it was reduced to some very basic premises. Arranged marriage in uk is quite different to how things might be arranged in Pakistan. Nearly everyone I know in this situation has been allowed to pursue a love match up to the age of 30, it is only when this has not worked that matchmakers are sought.
The film tried to oppose arranged marriages against a love match and this binary approach does not reflect real life. Secondly there was a sense we were, the audience, being educated but not with a realistic representation.
Did I laugh yes I did, did they follow through with any proper conclusion, no they didn't! The only conclusion I could draw from the movie was arranged marriages are all about pretence and the parents needs.
At best is was a 6 outta 10, I enjoyed it whilst I was watching it, but afterwards it really was quite unsatisfactory.
I liked the initial idea, however to make drama you need to compress reality and here it was reduced to some very basic premises. Arranged marriage in uk is quite different to how things might be arranged in Pakistan. Nearly everyone I know in this situation has been allowed to pursue a love match up to the age of 30, it is only when this has not worked that matchmakers are sought.
The film tried to oppose arranged marriages against a love match and this binary approach does not reflect real life. Secondly there was a sense we were, the audience, being educated but not with a realistic representation.
Did I laugh yes I did, did they follow through with any proper conclusion, no they didn't! The only conclusion I could draw from the movie was arranged marriages are all about pretence and the parents needs.
At best is was a 6 outta 10, I enjoyed it whilst I was watching it, but afterwards it really was quite unsatisfactory.
Totally lacking plot and character development the movie falls flat. Missing are all the usual twists, turns and laughs. There is no build or development of the main characters leaving them as empty and hollow as when they started.
This film makes the first half hour of Moonfall look like a cinematic masterpiece.
Whilst not bad and an easy watch this movie really fails to deliver. Carrying a camera awkwardly from scene to scene does not make our leading lady a documentary superstar.
We are not even given any insight into the two main characters life as children together, or any insight into them liking each other more than friends.
It's like two strangers kissing at the end taking a chance on what love?? Do they even like each other. There was no tension, no chemistry between them.
And what does Emma Thompson contribute? Jumping around each scene in a shrill voice adding nothing to the value of the movie.
This film makes the first half hour of Moonfall look like a cinematic masterpiece.
Whilst not bad and an easy watch this movie really fails to deliver. Carrying a camera awkwardly from scene to scene does not make our leading lady a documentary superstar.
We are not even given any insight into the two main characters life as children together, or any insight into them liking each other more than friends.
It's like two strangers kissing at the end taking a chance on what love?? Do they even like each other. There was no tension, no chemistry between them.
And what does Emma Thompson contribute? Jumping around each scene in a shrill voice adding nothing to the value of the movie.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesLead actors Lily James and Shazad Latif have been long time friends in real life.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe premiere takes place at the Curzon Mayfair, which is about a mile from the River Thames, but when Zoe goes outside during the screening, she's on the Embankment.
- Citações
Mo the Matchmaker: A Doctor! Top of the Food Chain!
- ConexõesFeatures O Passageiro (2018)
- Trilhas sonorasWhat's Love Got to Do With It
Written by Nitin Sawhney
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is What's Love Got to Do with It??Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- What's Love Got to Do with It?
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 11.065.050
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 48 min(108 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente