AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,3/10
1,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um olhar sobre a vida da princesa Diana através do arquivo contemporâneo criando uma narrativa ousada e envolvente de sua vida e morte, além de revelar a atitude do público em relação à mona... Ler tudoUm olhar sobre a vida da princesa Diana através do arquivo contemporâneo criando uma narrativa ousada e envolvente de sua vida e morte, além de revelar a atitude do público em relação à monarquia.Um olhar sobre a vida da princesa Diana através do arquivo contemporâneo criando uma narrativa ousada e envolvente de sua vida e morte, além de revelar a atitude do público em relação à monarquia.
- Prêmios
- 2 indicações no total
Princess Diana
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (as The Princess)
King Charles III
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Queen Elizabeth II
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Martin Bashir
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Tony Blair
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Gavin Campbell
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Lady Colin Campbell
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Hillary Clinton
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Jonathan Dimbleby
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Clint Eastwood
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Dodi Fayed
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Sarah Ferguson
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Robert Kilroy-Silk
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Henry Kissinger
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Bernie Levien
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
John Major
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Nelson Mandela
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Mother Teresa
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
I love documentaries more when they include archival materials such as videos and documents. This documentary is full of videos from the early 1980s to 1997 covering the time Diana passed from Prince Charles's girlfriend to her death. However, the film does not offer a timeline, a context, or an interview that helps situate the viewer in the images they are watching. For those who lived through those times, it is not challenging to situate themselves in the time situations shown in the archive videos happen. But anyone who did not live during those years can feel lost in the film. It feels like the people behind the film had to access all that video material and focus mainly on the editing part forgetting about the viewers. It could be done much better.
Premiered at the 2022 Sundance Film Festival in the Premieres Selection.
This documentary is about Princess Diana's story that is told exclusively through contemporaneous archive creating a bold and immersive narrative of her life and death. It also illuminates how the public's attitude to the monarchy was, and still is. This documentary is truly an emotional experience that goes in-depth about the life of Princess Diana's career and it does a great job on handling it's source material without being biased.
Director Ed Perkins managed to make a documentary that feels engaging, emotional, thought-provoking and well documented that you get a sense of reality and story about Princess Diana and everything that has been surrounding her. The soundtrack fits perfectly to the scenes being filmed, good editing, great sound design and the archive footage is well used and looks beautiful to look at. Restoration footages are always a treat to see as it helps to give you a good out look of what the past looked like. It's truly an experience to watch.
Diana has already been a big subject for years and knowing about her life and having down research about her problems and situations did make me feel emotional about it. Perkins did a fantastic job on documenting the film and I regret not seeing it when it premiered at the Sundance Film Festival right away.
A great mix of drama, realism and sometimes true horror.
Rating: A-
This documentary is about Princess Diana's story that is told exclusively through contemporaneous archive creating a bold and immersive narrative of her life and death. It also illuminates how the public's attitude to the monarchy was, and still is. This documentary is truly an emotional experience that goes in-depth about the life of Princess Diana's career and it does a great job on handling it's source material without being biased.
Director Ed Perkins managed to make a documentary that feels engaging, emotional, thought-provoking and well documented that you get a sense of reality and story about Princess Diana and everything that has been surrounding her. The soundtrack fits perfectly to the scenes being filmed, good editing, great sound design and the archive footage is well used and looks beautiful to look at. Restoration footages are always a treat to see as it helps to give you a good out look of what the past looked like. It's truly an experience to watch.
Diana has already been a big subject for years and knowing about her life and having down research about her problems and situations did make me feel emotional about it. Perkins did a fantastic job on documenting the film and I regret not seeing it when it premiered at the Sundance Film Festival right away.
A great mix of drama, realism and sometimes true horror.
Rating: A-
This documentary tells, at a pace, the story of Princess Diana through media coverage.
Many phases of Diana's relationship with the media, eg the Bashir interview, are worth a documentary in their own right.
The commentary is unspoken through the editing and music score. It doesn't tell those who lived through the 80s and 90s anything new and it certainly won't be last work on Diana's life.
There has been a lot of work selecting a vast range of archive footage, primarily from the UK and the US, with many hitherto unseen finds.
Most, if not all, of the original source material was shot in 4:3. I question the decision to crop and zoom all of this for widescreen, with a consequent degradation in picture quality. It would have been better to have preserved the original 4:3 aspect ratio.
On the Bashir interview, these are the only clips credited to the source on screen during the documentary. I understand this is because the BBC didn't give clearance for their use (the BBC has actually banned it from being licensed or repeated) and the documentary makers are claiming fair dealing on its use.
Many phases of Diana's relationship with the media, eg the Bashir interview, are worth a documentary in their own right.
The commentary is unspoken through the editing and music score. It doesn't tell those who lived through the 80s and 90s anything new and it certainly won't be last work on Diana's life.
There has been a lot of work selecting a vast range of archive footage, primarily from the UK and the US, with many hitherto unseen finds.
Most, if not all, of the original source material was shot in 4:3. I question the decision to crop and zoom all of this for widescreen, with a consequent degradation in picture quality. It would have been better to have preserved the original 4:3 aspect ratio.
On the Bashir interview, these are the only clips credited to the source on screen during the documentary. I understand this is because the BBC didn't give clearance for their use (the BBC has actually banned it from being licensed or repeated) and the documentary makers are claiming fair dealing on its use.
To start, yes there is a lot of low quality clips and much of what you see here has been in previous documentaries, however, it's not exactly possible to improve video quality from thirty years ago so you shouldn't judge it based on today's standards, that's just stupid. As for it "being done before" it's important to note that many docs fall to the wayside over the years and become difficult to track down, so there will always be new editions for every generation so long as Diana stays relevant.
I found this to be an interesting watch. There is no narrative, at least not in a literal sense, but there is an obvious angle to the documentary. Not all the information is presented, some parts of the clips shown are deliberately edited to enhance mood or atmosphere, like painting the prince or princess in a certain light. That being said, it's surprisingly unbiased, there was a lot of uncomfortable dialogue from interviews with citizens or journalists who were for or against Princess Diana. It was quite polarized The worst was the paparazzi. This documentary solidified my assumption that the paparazzi were as bad as everyone made them out be. The way they talked about her was disgusting, like she wasn't even a human being. They harassed her to the point of breaking her spirit. If she resisted them she was called a f---ing b----, if she dared played along and smiled or engaged with them they had the audacity to call her a mediawhore. It's like victim blaming after a rape, and it is extremely uncomfortable to watch.
I was also surprised to see so many people given a platform to speak out against her and say such repulsive things. I guess the bar was set incredibly low for journalistic integrity in the UK in the 80's and 90's. Journalists were given the opportunity to voice pointless, unfounded arguments which often ended up in childish name calling (?!).
The truth was that Diana was an unusual woman. Her humanitarian efforts were commendable, she did more than any of the other Royal family were willing to do at the time. Yes her marriage was on the rocks from the outset. Interviews with Charles have spelled out the truth from the begginning. I don't think he ever truly deceived Diana, but I believe she had trouble accepting and facing the truth and thought, like many women, that she could change him. It was cruel to expect her to just face up and deal with the situation and take it in stride. Blasting her for having mental health crises was just stigmatizing mental illness and it's part and parcel to the incredibly prejudiced attitudes of the time (which sadly still persist to this day). She was not a saint and that is not why people still talk about her to this day, she was representative of a hope for a future that really we will never know.
I recommend this doc but it is difficult at times to watch.
I found this to be an interesting watch. There is no narrative, at least not in a literal sense, but there is an obvious angle to the documentary. Not all the information is presented, some parts of the clips shown are deliberately edited to enhance mood or atmosphere, like painting the prince or princess in a certain light. That being said, it's surprisingly unbiased, there was a lot of uncomfortable dialogue from interviews with citizens or journalists who were for or against Princess Diana. It was quite polarized The worst was the paparazzi. This documentary solidified my assumption that the paparazzi were as bad as everyone made them out be. The way they talked about her was disgusting, like she wasn't even a human being. They harassed her to the point of breaking her spirit. If she resisted them she was called a f---ing b----, if she dared played along and smiled or engaged with them they had the audacity to call her a mediawhore. It's like victim blaming after a rape, and it is extremely uncomfortable to watch.
I was also surprised to see so many people given a platform to speak out against her and say such repulsive things. I guess the bar was set incredibly low for journalistic integrity in the UK in the 80's and 90's. Journalists were given the opportunity to voice pointless, unfounded arguments which often ended up in childish name calling (?!).
The truth was that Diana was an unusual woman. Her humanitarian efforts were commendable, she did more than any of the other Royal family were willing to do at the time. Yes her marriage was on the rocks from the outset. Interviews with Charles have spelled out the truth from the begginning. I don't think he ever truly deceived Diana, but I believe she had trouble accepting and facing the truth and thought, like many women, that she could change him. It was cruel to expect her to just face up and deal with the situation and take it in stride. Blasting her for having mental health crises was just stigmatizing mental illness and it's part and parcel to the incredibly prejudiced attitudes of the time (which sadly still persist to this day). She was not a saint and that is not why people still talk about her to this day, she was representative of a hope for a future that really we will never know.
I recommend this doc but it is difficult at times to watch.
Solid documentary that doesn't shy away from all of the opinions about Diana and the monarchy. No narrator or interviews, instead just a collection of interesting news clips and found footage that helps portray her life. Well edited, engaging, and interesting. I was 13 when she died, and this film helped me to understand why everyone was so devastated by the loss. Good companion piece to 'the crown' and 'the queen'.
Você sabia?
- Citações
Princess Diana: It is humbling to know that some of you feel that I should be honored in this way.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Princess?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Princess
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 72.453
- Tempo de duração1 hora 49 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente