AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,1/10
8 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA political leader's death leads to a power struggle. Amid corruption, greed and deceit, an unlikely opponent steps up.A political leader's death leads to a power struggle. Amid corruption, greed and deceit, an unlikely opponent steps up.A political leader's death leads to a power struggle. Amid corruption, greed and deceit, an unlikely opponent steps up.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 4 indicações no total
Nagendra Medida
- Bhramanna follower
- (apenas creditado)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
The story features good content and characters.
However, the screenplay suffers from being excessively slow-paced and lacking excitement.
Both the script and direction fail to match the quality of the original version.
Chiranjeevi is suitable for the role and delivers a commendable performance in many scenes, although some are not handled as effectively.
It would be unfair to compare Chiranjeevi to Mohanlal from the original film.
Sathya Dev also performs well in his role, although not as brilliantly as Vivek Oberoi.
Nayanthara follows her usual pattern of acting, similar to her previous films like "Tulasi," "Viswasam," and "Jayasimha." There's nothing new in her portrayal.
The on-screen pairing of Chiranjeevi and Nayanthara as brother and sister appears odd.
Salman Khan's role feels wasted, or rather, a good role is wasted on Salman.
The background score lifted from Vikram Veda is funny.
The cinematography is well-executed.
Editing seems to focus excessively on slow-motion sequences.
This film is not worth watching in theaters. It would be better to wait for its release on an OTT platform, especially if you haven't seen the original "Lucifer."
However, the screenplay suffers from being excessively slow-paced and lacking excitement.
Both the script and direction fail to match the quality of the original version.
Chiranjeevi is suitable for the role and delivers a commendable performance in many scenes, although some are not handled as effectively.
It would be unfair to compare Chiranjeevi to Mohanlal from the original film.
Sathya Dev also performs well in his role, although not as brilliantly as Vivek Oberoi.
Nayanthara follows her usual pattern of acting, similar to her previous films like "Tulasi," "Viswasam," and "Jayasimha." There's nothing new in her portrayal.
The on-screen pairing of Chiranjeevi and Nayanthara as brother and sister appears odd.
Salman Khan's role feels wasted, or rather, a good role is wasted on Salman.
The background score lifted from Vikram Veda is funny.
The cinematography is well-executed.
Editing seems to focus excessively on slow-motion sequences.
This film is not worth watching in theaters. It would be better to wait for its release on an OTT platform, especially if you haven't seen the original "Lucifer."
This is a film where the cinematic art dies. "Made for the masses" cannot be an excuse for releasing such a bad piece of work. About a good 30 minutes of the movie is reserved for people walking in slow motion. Ever present, deafening background music, two ugly songs, lack of a solid storyline make the film unbearable. Horrible lyrics and dance in the two songs! At times, the fact that the director saw the preview of the shots and said okay for certain takes to be included in the cut, surprises me.
Messiah like unrealistic depiction of the lead is mostly to pander the fan base and get whistles in the the theatres.
Sorry, we can't settle with this film being a hit or anything close to it.
I recommend skipping this for good.
Messiah like unrealistic depiction of the lead is mostly to pander the fan base and get whistles in the the theatres.
Sorry, we can't settle with this film being a hit or anything close to it.
I recommend skipping this for good.
I have dared to watch the movie and got a lingering headache. Lucifer is 1000 times more fine movie than this cheap remake. If the director has just copied as is then it would've been better but it was worst after changing the story and background music is like a comedy tunes. Salman khan is the worst riding the bike as a one man army. I would suggest chiranjeevi to take a nap and rest, he looks like his rival mohan babu. Movies like Lucifer and Ayyappanum Koshiyum are masterpieces and tollywood is ruining them with remakes and trying to show the super hero roles for the main characters but forgetting that those characters are perfect as is and the content should not be altered. Learn from hollywood which does remake of international movies without spoiling the content (example : the man called ove is being remake by Tom Hanks with the name the man called otto). Learn from them and don't just blindly go with fan approval.
I have seen Lucifer in Malayalam with subtitles and feel of the movie always connects to the hero's characterisation.
God Father clearly missed this and just focused on adding unnecessary masala elements with unconvincing hero characterisation.
Chiranjeevi sir should stop doing these remakes and should give chance to the young directors the way Kamal Hassan done with Vikram.
Audience taste has been changed and chiranjeevis mindset stuck 10 years back when he joined politics. Please update.
Start giving chances to new director's and stop involving in scripts of the successful directors like koratala shiva.
God Father clearly missed this and just focused on adding unnecessary masala elements with unconvincing hero characterisation.
Chiranjeevi sir should stop doing these remakes and should give chance to the young directors the way Kamal Hassan done with Vikram.
Audience taste has been changed and chiranjeevis mindset stuck 10 years back when he joined politics. Please update.
Start giving chances to new director's and stop involving in scripts of the successful directors like koratala shiva.
If you have seen the original movie Lucifer then you can compare that suspense level is very high in Lucifer compared to Godfather.
Poster and trailer already reveled that there is some relation between Chiranjeevi and Salmaan and while watching the movie you can guess there is some relation.
Salmaan's role is overexaggerated in the movie and the fight seens are overextended which shifts the audiance attendance to this side character.
Also the plotting of songs are not appropriate and seems like they are trying to fit in the songs for no reason.
Over all It is not worth watching. But the original movie Lucifer deserves a watch.
Poster and trailer already reveled that there is some relation between Chiranjeevi and Salmaan and while watching the movie you can guess there is some relation.
Salmaan's role is overexaggerated in the movie and the fight seens are overextended which shifts the audiance attendance to this side character.
Also the plotting of songs are not appropriate and seems like they are trying to fit in the songs for no reason.
Over all It is not worth watching. But the original movie Lucifer deserves a watch.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesFirst time megastar Chiranjeevi and Salman Khan come to gather in a film.
- Trilhas sonorasThaar Maar Thakkar Maar (Telugu)
Music by S. Thaman
Lyrics by Anantha Sriram
Performed by Shreya Ghoshal
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Godfather?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 18.737.287
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 37 min(157 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente