Code 207

This movie was bad from the script to the acting to the action sequences. And as a combat veteran, I really have to question the lead actors biography (Tino Struckland). Seems there is a lot of "fluff" in it. If he spent even a day in the military he would know the tactics, uniform and dialect used in this movie to portray the military were way off base and ridiculous. A personal friend of mine had a part in the movie and that is the ONLY reason I watched it. As I wanted it, it backs one of those "too bad not to watch" kind of things and I just had to finish it. If you've got some time to waste and want to watch something mindless and ridiculous, maybe watch something else.

Good action film, 11 July 2012 10/10 Author: web hardy from United States

it was a well thought out low budget action film it would have been better had they had a bit more money for the production and editing, but the acting is solid, a few award winning actors so no wonder. it is a low budget film sure, but for what they had they made the best of it, the story works, and inspired by real events makes it worth it the lead actors did a great job deserving of a bigger movie, and some of the new faces also. it could have paced up a little in the beginning but worth watching over a drink, there are a lot of studio films witch are worse, but for the low budget it was a good job for the budget loved the location, good choice Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following review useful: cool low budget action film, with a little humor and a twist, 10 July 2012 10/10 Author: vincent jones from United States

very low budget action film, and i have never seen anybody get that much out of that little money, so great job there. the acting was solid, and a good cast. some of the actors I know from sports and TV shows. the fight scenes looked well done, very real (im not sure they didn't hurt themselves actually) love to see Chase Stevens and Tommy Mercer I hope finally they are going to Hollywood, they did a great job. and the play between the lead Mac and Tiffany were really well done and funny moments too the editing could have been better, a bit of a slow start but I enjoyed it, good film for popcorn and a few beers. had they had a bit more money it would have been an awesome film worthy of cinema Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following review useful: Good little action film,, 10 July 2012 10/10 Author: sedelstein from United States

the idea they set out to do is solid, and the actors are good, it could have been shot a bit better and edited a bit faster, but for a popcorn film its pretty good. there is no real use of cgi or a lot of filler, its pretty much suspense and action throughout. it is a low budget film, sure, but its better then most of the low budget i have seen, great use of, pro wrestlers, and they did a great job too, a few new faces too, some of them could goo far if Hollywood finds them. the leads did a great job and should definitely be seen in bigger action films and have higher budgets i saw interview with the director talking about the storyline based on the real human trafficking going on right here in our back yard. and that makes it worth watching just on that account. Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following review useful: OK action film for an independent, 10 July 2012 10/10 Author: don zimmerman from United States

it was a good little action film, sure it could have been shot and edited better, but all in all well done. the acting is better then most low budget films I have seen, the storyline starts a little slow, but comes together well in the end. based on real events should make it worth watching. the fight scenes seems very real and the play between the two leads is reminiscent of moonlighting, well done and a little funny at times, which is good as most low budget action takes itself far to serious. i would love to see what these guys can do with more money on their next film, they have the right ideas but could have done with a little more time and funding

Acting is below B grade, and I was actually trying to decide if movie is worse due to bad writing or bad directing, then I checked here and saw both were done by same guy. Stop making movies Tino, go do something productive with your life!

As a matter of fact, the way one scene involving PTSD portrays it is flat out insulting. Its like person that wrote this horrible waste of time didn't even bother to read Wiki entries on topics he wrote about. Its THAT bad.

If you want to see good movies about topic this movie tries (and miserably fails) to tackle, see Trade with Kevin Kline or Taken with Liam Neeson.

I am a U.S. MARINE CORPS VET and over all I really liked this movie. Yes the acting was extremely bad especially on all the males parts as the all the females acting was a little better. Any man who wouldn't go all out to extremes to hunt down their children kidnappers and personally punish them and get their children back is NOT really a man at all. I would do much worse than what this husband in this movie did if it were my wife and or child.

They did a pretty good job, it is a little rough on editing and camera, but they were working clearly working on a budget, the writing was just as good as any studio film. And the acting good. I agree I did enjoy the play between the various characters it Tiffany and Struckmann did a pretty damn funny job at times. Well done. I understand that it was made on an extremely low budget, and some people love to compare those to large studio films, but this seems hardly fair, These guys made a good little film with a solid story. The acting was solid throughout even if the editing and camera work could have been better. and like peter said it is made to tell a serious story about a very big problem and making a film to depict it is inspiring.