[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais bem avaliadosFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroBilheteria de sucessoHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de filmesDestaque do cinema indiano
    O que está passando na TV e no streamingAs 250 séries mais bem avaliadasProgramas de TV mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias de TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbGuia de entretenimento para a famíliaPodcasts do IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalPrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Criado hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorEnquetes
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
Guia de episódios
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
  • Curiosidades
  • Perguntas frequentes
IMDbPro

Deadliest Warrior

  • Série de TV
  • 2009–2011
  • 42 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,5/10
3,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Deadliest Warrior (2009)
For the last face-off of the season, "Deadliest Warrior" pits vampires versus zombies. See which undead creature comes out on top as part of the supersized season finale, airing at 9pm Wednesday, Sept. 14 on cable's Spike.
Reproduzir clip2:37
Assistir a Vampires vs. Zombies Claw Test
1 vídeo
56 fotos
AçãoGame ShowHistória

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaThe great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.

  • Criação
    • Timothy Prokop
  • Artistas
    • Geoff Desmoulin
    • Armand Dorian
    • Max Geiger
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    7,5/10
    3,6 mil
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Criação
      • Timothy Prokop
    • Artistas
      • Geoff Desmoulin
      • Armand Dorian
      • Max Geiger
    • 30Avaliações de usuários
    • 5Avaliações da crítica
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Episódios33

    Explorar episódios
    PrincipaisMais avaliados

    Vídeos1

    Vampires vs. Zombies Claw Test
    Clip 2:37
    Vampires vs. Zombies Claw Test

    Fotos56

    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    Ver pôster
    + 50
    Ver pôster

    Elenco principal99+

    Editar
    Geoff Desmoulin
    • Self - Host…
    • 2009–2011
    Armand Dorian
    • Self…
    • 2009–2011
    Max Geiger
    • Self - Computer Programmer…
    • 2009–2010
    Richard Machowicz
    Richard Machowicz
    • Self - Host…
    • 2011
    David Lain Baker
    David Lain Baker
    • Self…
    • 2011
    Sonny Sison
    • Al Capone…
    • 2009–2010
    David Wenham
    David Wenham
    • Narrator
    • 2009
    Shaun Paul Piccinino
    Shaun Paul Piccinino
    • William Wallace…
    • 2009–2010
    Robert Daley
    • Self - Combat Engine Designer…
    • 2011
    Ardeshir Radpour
    Ardeshir Radpour
    • Hernan Cortes…
    • 2010–2011
    Ryan T. Husk
    Ryan T. Husk
    • British Soldier…
    • 2009
    Bryan Forrest
    Bryan Forrest
    • Conquistador…
    • 2010–2011
    Mathew Lorenceau
    Mathew Lorenceau
    • French Foreign Legion Hero…
    • 2009–2011
    Westley Nguyen
    • Khmer Rouge Soldier…
    • 2009–2011
    Andrew Rasputin
    • Spetsnaz Leader…
    • 2009–2010
    Mike Mayhall
    Mike Mayhall
    • IRA Member…
    • 2009
    Aaron Schoenke
    Aaron Schoenke
    • Apache…
    • 2009
    Jason Nguyen
    Jason Nguyen
    • Asian Weapons Expert…
    • 2010–2011
    • Criação
      • Timothy Prokop
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários30

    7,53.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    8utsacad03

    Awesome Show, Science meets History

    I've watched the first 2 episodes 1. Gladiator vs Apache Warrior and 2. Viking vs Samurai and was very impressed. The show uses a lot of the high tech data devices like Sports Science and goes as in-depth as possible in the shows time slot. It uses multiple factors in deciding who would win the fights. That range from distance to weapons used. The use of modern day experts in the cultures make for great trash talking. Other fights to look forward to include Spartans, ninja's and pirates. If your interested in the history of warriors throughout time and can believe in the science deciding the winner then this show is a must watch.
    noblegrand41

    question accuracy

    As others have stated there are certain problems with each separate episode. As an example Al Capone vs. Jesse James. There were no handguns used by Al Capone which was inaccurate. The use of the Chicago typewriter had all ammunition used in one continuous burst -- which action could be questioned. The Chicago typewriter could have been fired in shorter bursts to allow more accurate along with more sustained firepower without reloading.

    In this episode Al Capone could have carried a Colt .45 1911 or other handgun. There would have been a difference in the amount of handgun firepower between a Colt .45 1911 and a Colt .45 Peacemaker revolver.

    Also either side could have been armed with a 10 or 12 gauge shotgun which could have also made a difference in the outcome. In my opinion all avenues were not explored or considered.

    In other episodes there seems to be questions in regards to individual combat vs. warriors who are used to fighting in groups. There are many differences in methods used during these confrontations, which should be taken into consideration along with an individual person's ability.
    6mike-ryan455

    Fun, but not accurate

    Don't get me wrong. This ranks up there with my other low brow comedy shows on Spike like "1,000 ways to die." It's great for something to relax to, and watching people get splattered makes it all the more fun. But accurate it is not.

    Their firearms knowledge is ludicrous. For example, on the Yakuza vs. Mafia episode they stated the Yakuza used the Walther P-38 pistol. Yet the graphics they showed were of a P-08 Luger. These are two totally, totally different looking pistols designed close to half a century apart. They had the IRA carrying a Boer War period .455 Webley revolver and they touted its reliability over a Makarov. I own both. There is no comparison between the Makarov and the Webley. You can't hit the broad side of a barn with a Webley.

    They do not test uniformly. In the Yakuza vs. Mafia episode, the Mafia had six machine gun targets they had to hit with the Thompson. The Yakuza only had four they had to hit with a Sten. That gave the Sten an easier score. Worse still, they used completely different ways of testing the Russian hand grenade and the US hand grenade. Why not do something logical - put three pig carcases up in an enclosed room and see how each grenade does? It's a uniform test? I shouldn't expect too much from Spike. It's unabashedly guy TV, and I like that. But they could do a lot better job with a little more care.
    7dorotka24

    Action heavy, logic lapsed

    I must first say about this series that the premise is outstanding, and one that has crossed my mind on numerous occasions. What would happen if a medieval knight met up with a samurai? Who would be victorious in battle?

    The show then attempts to determine whom is the better warrior amongst two different kinds in history - in many cases two warriors that are separated by many centuries. The arms and armors available to these warriors are demonstrated, both in their lethal potential or in their stopping power in the case of armor. The demonstrations are fascinating, including weapons experts that strike or fire their weapons at ballistics gel encased, and presumably reproduction skeletons. A physician or medical specialist then examines the footage, or the dummy in some cases, and describes the type of trauma inflicted. At the end, we get a well choreographed fight between two re-enactors dressed in costume to simulate the potential outcome of such a contest, as well as a statistics model that determines the winner in 1,000 contests. I like this concept because despite the advantages a particular warrior might possess over another, the randomness of combat will ensure that even the presumably better warrior will lose at least a percentage of the time.

    The problems with the show are many, however, and seriously challenge the credibility of the participants. As others have pointed out, a warrior is more than the sum of his weapons and armor, which the show spends the most amount of time demonstrating. I think the premise could be dropped and have the show focus on weapons demonstrations only. Although the mindset, culture, tactics, and goals of each warrior are mentioned, these descriptions are brief and superficial. In addition,the hypothetical combats displayed are all duels. Most of the warriors portrayed would rarely, if ever, be faced with a duel situation, instead fighting in a unit of many soldiers/warriors. The worst part for me has to be the banter or trash talk between the weapons experts representing each respective warrior. It reminds me of a WWE matchup or a pre-boxing/MMA trash session instead of a presumably serious and/or scientific look at a hypothetical combat situation.

    At any rate, I do enjoy the show because it has many good aspects. But the flaws do not make for "must-see" TV. If they would focus a little more on the tactics, drop the banter, and perhaps consider tactical unit combat instead of duels, I believe the show would be much improved. The producers are obviously trying to cater to a younger, action thirsty crowd, perhaps in an effort to make history more interesting. I applaud this rationale if nothing else, but the more discriminating viewers with a desire for logical and factual history, such as myself, are often left wanting.

    If any wish for a superior show with similarities to DW, check out an earlier History Channel series called "Conquest" with Peter Woodward. The latter is more mature, yet still with some light hearted moments. It covers nearly every criticism I have for DW and then some (see my review).

    EDIT: I had not seen Season 3 prior to this original review, and S3 does cover some of my criticisms for the first two Seasons. The banter here has been toned down substantially and the combats all consist of units fighting each other. The warrior's mindsets, values, and motivations are explored with the addition of Richard Machowicz. I also liked the addition of the "X Factors" as well, or somewhat intangible characteristics such as mental health or physical fitness which could positively or negatively impact a side's performance. Overall the changes added a more serious and scientific component to the show that was a substantial improvement IMO.

    There are still a few problems that I saw, particularly with the tendency to match two opponents who were not a very good matchup to begin with. Hannibal and Genghis Khan was a good example, as they were separated by nearly 1,400 years and Khan's armor and weapons technology was far superior. Same could be said of William the Conqueror and Joan of Arc. It was a little silly to see a unit of five men firing a heavy artillery piece at each other as well. The elite modern soldiers did not have weapons that they most likely would have carried. I am particularly thinking about the Rangers/North Korea and Gurkha/French Foreign Legion in that all these soldiers would have probably carried hand grenades and a pistol of some kind. Roosevelt/Lawrence of Arabia or even Washington/Napolean would have probably had pistols as well. Oddly enough, only Pancho Villa/Crazy Horse were depicted carrying pistols.

    In general, the format changes in S3 were an improvement and I enjoyed it quite a bit more than the previous seasons.
    7SnoopyStyle

    drunk history

    This is a Spike TV show. Its inspiration comes from drunk arguments or smoke pontifications. What would happen if two different types of historical warriors who never came into contact actually get into a fight? It's a fun idea. The audience is introduce to a minimal history lesson, a few weapons from each fighter, and a faux simulation of the fight. The history lesson is only interesting for the less-known fighters. The weapons testing is the most interesting section. There are a few really obscure weapons. I've never seen the Chinese repeating crossbow. The Rajput weapons are weird. They also get to blow up stuff, slice and dice, and play with guns. The last section is the simulation section. It's the section that one could skip over. It's LARPing.

    The third season tries to personalize the warriors by pinpointing historical leaders. It gives some unnecessary personal data and battle strategy. If you're comparing Joan of Arc with William the Conqueror, the personal size difference is of little interest to me. The battle strategy is intriguing in theory but this show is unable to do an in-depth dive into that subject matter. The show is grasping at straws by this point and Vampires vs. Zombies is the definition of jumping the shark. It's a fun little show while it lasted.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Pimp My Ride
    5,7
    Pimp My Ride
    1000 Maneiras de Morrer
    6,8
    1000 Maneiras de Morrer
    To Catch a Predator
    8,1
    To Catch a Predator
    The Legend of Calamity Jane
    6,9
    The Legend of Calamity Jane
    Tosh.0
    7,3
    Tosh.0
    Epic Rap Battles of History
    8,1
    Epic Rap Battles of History
    Ridiculousness
    6,3
    Ridiculousness
    O Show do Pernalonga
    8,6
    O Show do Pernalonga
    Survivorman
    8,2
    Survivorman
    À Prova de Tudo
    8,1
    À Prova de Tudo
    Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction
    7,9
    Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction
    The Andy Milonakis Show
    5,7
    The Andy Milonakis Show

    Enredo

    Editar

    Você sabia?

    Editar
    • Curiosidades
      This show first aired April 2009. It quickly became the number one show on Spike.
    • Citações

      [repeated line]

      Narrator: Who will be the deadliest warrior?

    • Conexões
      Featured in How TV Ruined Your Life: Knowledge (2011)

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Perguntas frequentes

    • How many seasons does Deadliest Warrior have?Fornecido pela Alexa

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 10 de março de 2009 (Estados Unidos da América)
    • País de origem
      • Estados Unidos da América
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • El guerrero más letal
    • Locações de filme
      • Los Angeles, Califórnia, EUA
    • Empresas de produção
      • 44 Blue Productions
      • Morningstar Entertainment
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      42 minutos
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Dolby SR
    • Proporção
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    Deadliest Warrior (2009)
    Principal brecha
    By what name was Deadliest Warrior (2009) officially released in India in English?
    Responda
    • Veja mais brechas
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar páginaAdicionar episódio

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o aplicativo IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença do IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Empregos
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, uma empresa da Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.