Chandramukhi 2: A Vingança

To start with, the movie is excessively loud. I went to watch the movie for the pure nostalgia, but you are betrayed by poor writing, poor screenplay, and all round poor acting. The movie plays like a mega serial right from the start. If you were expecting Vadivelu to recreate the magic from Chandramukhi 1, you will be wrong! Nobody can save this movie.

The graphics are horrible. The CGI is cringe work. The dog fight sequence is among the worst.

If you thought Keeravani' s background score and music would be worth the watch, you are once again wrong!

Finally, the direction! You would not have expected P. Vasu to have directed this movie.

The Former was a cult classic which literally had a very strong screenplay due to its Original versions from Other language. But This is better be called as a Spoof or remake's remake. Definitely It is not a Sequel. Raghava Lawrence gave his part as vettaiyan which looks so pathetic and Kangana Ranaut couldn't even match with the former performances of other legends. The Unofficial Sequel Nagavalli was even better compared to this. Dir P. Vasu insulted the whole fanbase of chandramukhi. Superstar Rajinikanth chose Enthiran over this which the best thing that happened in his life. Extremely Bad.

While Chandramukhi 1 boasted a meticulously crafted screenplay brimming with entertainment, mystery, and thrills, its sequel, Chandramukhi 2, unfortunately falls short in comparison. In the second installment, the narrative treads a familiar path, rendering everything rather predictable. It fails to deliver the captivating entertainment and spine-tingling thrills that its predecessor offered, often veering towards boredom. The climax, in particular, drags on endlessly, testing the patience of the audience.

Lead actor Lawrence's exaggerated performance proves to be a significant irritant, feeling entirely out of place for the character he portrays. The first half of the film lacks the spark of excitement, only coming to life when the flashback episode unfolds in the second half. On a positive note, Kangana's presence graces the screen with her beauty, and her acting and dance sequences, while decent, lack the impact one would hope for. Some might argue that she doesn't quite fit the character as envisioned.

On the technical front, the cinematography and set design shine, showcasing the visual prowess of the production team. Unfortunately, the songs fail to leave a mark. Moreover, the direction adheres to an outdated style that doesn't align with contemporary storytelling trends.

In conclusion, I cannot recommend watching Chandramukhi 2, either in theaters or on OTT platforms.

Kangana has become a stale actress with lack of variations in expression or dialogue delivery. The movie is so boring it feels like watching an entire ektaa kapoor soap in one sitting. There is no rhyme or reason to the storyline which keeps dragging on in multiple directions without any logical direction. Dialogues are so childish it seems like kangana improvised every sentence thinking she's making it "better". I would have left after first half if I hadn't fell asleep twice during the movie. I wouldn't watch it even for free on OTT so if anyone has not seen it yet, save your time, money and brain cells!

CGI-BAD MAKE UP- BAD SCREENPLAY- BAD, BORING, PREDICTABLE

UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCE. THIS IS 2023, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER SCREENPLAY AND CGI ETC BUT SUCH A WASTE.

The story has too many unnecessary dialogue. Lack of emotion. Poor taste for comedy scene, action scene. Nothing is special. Except kangana song. Eventho she was rather stiff at dancing she made it BUT HER MAKE UP AS THE GHOST IS PRETTY PATHETIC. Jyothika was better and THAT WAS IN 2005. Come on! She expression was subpar meanwhile the hero did a better job representing himself as the antagonist. The storyline is surprisingly so average and just waste of time.