AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,0/10
57 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Três jovens acidentalmente trazem as irmãs Sanderson de volta à Salem moderna e devem descobrir como impedir que as bruxas famintas por crianças causem estragos no mundo.Três jovens acidentalmente trazem as irmãs Sanderson de volta à Salem moderna e devem descobrir como impedir que as bruxas famintas por crianças causem estragos no mundo.Três jovens acidentalmente trazem as irmãs Sanderson de volta à Salem moderna e devem descobrir como impedir que as bruxas famintas por crianças causem estragos no mundo.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Indicado para 3 Primetime Emmys
- 2 vitórias e 16 indicações no total
Juju Journey Brener
- Young Sarah
- (as Juju Brener)
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Hocus Pocus 2' is appreciated for nostalgic elements, the return of the Sanderson sisters, and fun performances. Callbacks and new songs are enjoyed, though humor is sometimes criticized as too kid-friendly or forced. The film's exploration of sisterhood and emotional moments resonate, yet it faces criticism for a weak plot, underdeveloped new characters, and a lack of the original's magic. Despite mixed reviews, it is seen as a fun, if imperfect, sequel.
Avaliações em destaque
Hocus Pocus 2 uses a plethora of nostalgic references to the 1993 film. It follows basic legacyquel rules - bringing back characters and repeating old narrative concerns for a new audience. However, it's almost exactly the same premise, just set in contemporary times and touches on contemporary discussions around female empowerment.
Some of the jokes are funny, and Bette Midler brings star power, but I can't help but think this sequel tarnishes the original. Hocus Pocus 2 didn't have the fun and thrills of the first film. It is very Disneyfied. More child friendly, and has no real antagonist.
As a fan of the first film who watched it as a child, I hoped this sequel would have a continuation of story, and would trigger nostalgia in a positive way. Unfortunately, it was a disappointment.
Some of the jokes are funny, and Bette Midler brings star power, but I can't help but think this sequel tarnishes the original. Hocus Pocus 2 didn't have the fun and thrills of the first film. It is very Disneyfied. More child friendly, and has no real antagonist.
As a fan of the first film who watched it as a child, I hoped this sequel would have a continuation of story, and would trigger nostalgia in a positive way. Unfortunately, it was a disappointment.
In a time where Disney seems to struggle for new material, a sequel to a 29-year-old cult classic could've easily gone wrong. However, the movie is clever, enjoyable and the Sanderson sisters return is lots of fun.
Similar to the original, expect some camp witchcraft, spells through music and dance, and Winnie, Mary and Sarah once again on the hunt to be young, beautiful and to survive past dawn.
I watched the original earlier to refresh myself, but the movie does a great job of standing alone whilst also referencing key scenes in the 1993 film which have impact on the 2022 storyline.
Overall, a lot of fun for what it is and sure to be popular amongst those of us that grew up loving the original. A shame the kids from the first film didn't make a cameo!
Similar to the original, expect some camp witchcraft, spells through music and dance, and Winnie, Mary and Sarah once again on the hunt to be young, beautiful and to survive past dawn.
I watched the original earlier to refresh myself, but the movie does a great job of standing alone whilst also referencing key scenes in the 1993 film which have impact on the 2022 storyline.
Overall, a lot of fun for what it is and sure to be popular amongst those of us that grew up loving the original. A shame the kids from the first film didn't make a cameo!
I don't understand how fans of the first film would want to trash this.
The story offers a mix of prequel information, first film nostalgia and a decent revival of our characters. It isn't without flaws but after nearly thirty years, I found the plot interesting and fun to watch. The characters are older but still gave nice performances and the new characters weren't awful.
Most sequels fail to live up to the original film and you know this before sitting down but that doesn't mean they aren't fun to watch. I personally liked seeing the characters brought back and can honestly say that I enjoyed the experience. In my opinion, had the 1993 original not been made, simply cutting the references to it would've made this a fine stand alone film.
To each their own.
The story offers a mix of prequel information, first film nostalgia and a decent revival of our characters. It isn't without flaws but after nearly thirty years, I found the plot interesting and fun to watch. The characters are older but still gave nice performances and the new characters weren't awful.
Most sequels fail to live up to the original film and you know this before sitting down but that doesn't mean they aren't fun to watch. I personally liked seeing the characters brought back and can honestly say that I enjoyed the experience. In my opinion, had the 1993 original not been made, simply cutting the references to it would've made this a fine stand alone film.
To each their own.
I'll try my best to not spoil it...
It was a fun film, has nothing on the original sadly.
Referring to the 1993 movie with someone in the film watching the original! How's that possible!
I feel they tried too hard here at times Some of the jokes just over the top As much as the sets looked good, they also looked fake I feel kids will like it but the long time fans will enjoy it just not love it as much as the original
Lots of links to the first and hooks to match them up, but 3 key people missing with no real mention yet the evens were.
As I said it's fun, very "camp" can I say that?
I didn't have much hope for it and I was right for that, I also predicted the store for the main character
Also, the story of where Book came from was changed for this film
Will I watch it again, yeah of course and in time it more than likely might become a classic no brain power needed movie.
But the original will never be beaten that's for sure.
Disney just don't do a Ghostbuster on us now... I feel that could happen
As as for the 2 cut scenes.
It was a fun film, has nothing on the original sadly.
Referring to the 1993 movie with someone in the film watching the original! How's that possible!
I feel they tried too hard here at times Some of the jokes just over the top As much as the sets looked good, they also looked fake I feel kids will like it but the long time fans will enjoy it just not love it as much as the original
Lots of links to the first and hooks to match them up, but 3 key people missing with no real mention yet the evens were.
As I said it's fun, very "camp" can I say that?
I didn't have much hope for it and I was right for that, I also predicted the store for the main character
Also, the story of where Book came from was changed for this film
Will I watch it again, yeah of course and in time it more than likely might become a classic no brain power needed movie.
But the original will never be beaten that's for sure.
Disney just don't do a Ghostbuster on us now... I feel that could happen
As as for the 2 cut scenes.
Took sheer will power to get through the first 10 minutes it was like watching a middle school play. The 3 young witches were acting like they were waiting for us audience members to clap for how "cute" they were acting and it wasn't cute. So goofy! In a bad way. Terrible over the top acting!!! Everyone was trying way too hard. The first one felt grounded in reality within the fantasy of it, we could relate to the characters and it is such a great comfort movie I have watched every Halloween. This movie belongs at the bottom of the trash bin in what I would label as generic. All the actors were acting with a capital A! It's trying way too hard. The one playing the boyfriend, Froy something was so animatedly over acting it was painful. You may like this film if you're of the brainless and passive influencer crowd, but I don't know how a fan of the original could love this. I feel violated. Casting and films today are all about cheap optics and not good story telling.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesOn the podcast Inside of You (2018), Doug Jones said that the wig he wears as Billy Butcherson in this movie is the same one he wore in the first movie.
- Erros de gravaçãoGilbert states that as a child, he witnessed the climatic finale of the first movie, but in said film, all the children of Salem were under Sarah's trance at this point, marching towards the Sanderson cottage. Gilbert is clearly capable of performing magic and therefore, it's possible, he may be immune, like the Sanderson Sisters.
- Citações
Winifred Sanderson: [from trailer] Lock up your children! Yes, Salem, we're back!
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosSPOILER: There is a scene after the closing credits: Cobweb the black cat jumps onto a shelf next to a box containing a second Black Flame candle.
- ConexõesEdited from Abracadabra (1993)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Hocus Pocus 2?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Hocus Pocus 2
- Locações de filme
- Newport Rhode Island, EUA(Washington Square, aka: Eisenhower Park and Touro Street)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 100.000.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 43 min(103 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.20 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente