AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,9/10
3 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Uma mulher luta para ser acreditada enquanto é perseguida por uma figura ameaçadora que retorna a sua casa noite após noite. Quando não consegue obter ajuda dos que a rodeiam, ela é forçada ... Ler tudoUma mulher luta para ser acreditada enquanto é perseguida por uma figura ameaçadora que retorna a sua casa noite após noite. Quando não consegue obter ajuda dos que a rodeiam, ela é forçada a tomar as coisas em suas próprias mãos.Uma mulher luta para ser acreditada enquanto é perseguida por uma figura ameaçadora que retorna a sua casa noite após noite. Quando não consegue obter ajuda dos que a rodeiam, ela é forçada a tomar as coisas em suas próprias mãos.
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Leith M. Burke
- Rob
- (as Leith Burke)
Nikea Gamby-Turner
- Detective
- (as Nikea Gamby Turner)
Avaliações em destaque
I saw this film on Shudder, titled "It's A Secret", so I knew to expect something off the beaten path from a typical horror film. The constant looming presence of the silent killer has a very Michael Myers-esque approach to an abstraction of the turmoil the protagonist faces as she (Goes) It Alone with some fairly well-put together kills along the way, but the climax isn't one for anyone who expects clear answers. I had to stop treating this film as a standard film with a beginning, middle, and end (?) and instead focus on the way she deals with the killer rather than expect any explained reasons why he's there. It gets surreal towards the end, but I can't say I disliked it.
1. Poor or non-existent forensics reduced the credibility of the story.
2. Like a poor teacher the storyline does not direct the audience into thinking about the issue of fear, but instead has us asking what's going on. The focus was on knives, hammers, blood on floor, bodies gone.
3. Bodies disappearing opens many interpretations some of which are nonsensical which added to the confusion. Was she hallucinating; a metaphor; ghosts/spirits?
4. The poor response to securing the home & ways of protecting one's self gives us another female victim character as helpless & lacking intelligence.
5. Even the DVDs special feature of production staff audio commentary overlay said nothing about the story itself, but only camera angles, lighting, etc.
2. Like a poor teacher the storyline does not direct the audience into thinking about the issue of fear, but instead has us asking what's going on. The focus was on knives, hammers, blood on floor, bodies gone.
3. Bodies disappearing opens many interpretations some of which are nonsensical which added to the confusion. Was she hallucinating; a metaphor; ghosts/spirits?
4. The poor response to securing the home & ways of protecting one's self gives us another female victim character as helpless & lacking intelligence.
5. Even the DVDs special feature of production staff audio commentary overlay said nothing about the story itself, but only camera angles, lighting, etc.
I appreciate directors and writers who try to do things a little differently to the constant identical horror movies we see everyday. And I like the fact we get presented with movies that aren't as straightforward as others. This movies reminds me of Mother! While I like the ideas behind the movies and trying to get people to think outside the box, the execution of these films needs to be a little tidier. They start off really interesting and as a viewer, you're really intrigued and excited....and then they just go to a weird place and don't come back, and you're sitting there thinking...'huh?'
There were several plot holes in this film and many things that were introduced were not explained at all. Not everyone who watched will be able to deduce certain clues brought up. It doesn't need to be a blatant in your face explanation that takes away from the mystery of the film, but it does need to be addressed in a way the viewer is like, 'ah, ok...I see what they did there.' It felt unfinished at 1hr 20mins. Could have packed a bit more in to wrap things up.
There were several plot holes in this film and many things that were introduced were not explained at all. Not everyone who watched will be able to deduce certain clues brought up. It doesn't need to be a blatant in your face explanation that takes away from the mystery of the film, but it does need to be addressed in a way the viewer is like, 'ah, ok...I see what they did there.' It felt unfinished at 1hr 20mins. Could have packed a bit more in to wrap things up.
I dont get all the really bad reviews for this film. It wasnt that bad but it wasn't amazing either just ok. Yes it doesnt explain a lot and yes its a looped plot film but it tries to hard for the deaper meaning than just a typical looped slasher although it probably would have been better if stuck to the loops without the deepness. The acting isnt great and can seem a bit b movie ish at times but they get the job done well enough. It did have potential to be a hell of a lot better but overall it was different from what i expected and i didn't mind that. The direction is the best part of this film. Some good shots and a mellow score with synth elements bring a nice welcomed atmosphere and help set the tone. Its not the best film ever made or the best looped style movie but its worth a watch nonetheless.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoAt 19:32, when May is talking to Ted's sister Sarah, her iPhone isn't compatible with the case she's using.
- ConexõesFeatured in Dead Meat Podcast: Interview with Brea Grant (2021)
- Trilhas sonorasSign of the Times
Written by Hannah Fairlight
Produced by Michael Wagener
Performed by Hannah Fairlight
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Lucky?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Lucky
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 23 min(83 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente