Avaliações de usuários

Eugene Bell (Zach Cregger) and Tucker Cleigh (Trevor Moore) have been best friends since they were children. Tucker has always had sexual attraction for women having his life driven by sex while Eugene and his sweetheart Cindi Whitehall (Raquel Alessi) do not have sexual intercourse waiting for their marriage. However on the day of their prom, Cindi decides that they should have sex. After the prom, they go to a party and Tucker convinces the nervous Eugene to drink a couple of drinks. Eugene is not used to drink and becomes dizzy, falling in the basement. Four years later, Eugene awakens from a coma and finds that Tucker is the only one that waited for him, since his father traveled abroad and his girlfriend has moved to another city. Further, Tucker is living with the schoolmate Candace (Molly Stanton) and he has atrophy of his muscles and incontinence. Soon they discover that Cindi is the centerfold of the March edition of Playboy magazine and she will be at Hugh Hefner's mansion in the anniversary party. Tucker has a serious situation with Candance and he needs to flee from her brother, who is a fireman. He takes Eugene with him and drives to the mansion to meet Cindi in a road trip full of incidents and confusions.

"Miss March" is among the most moronic and brainless films ever produced and certainly hated by professional critics. The story is politically incorrect since the very beginning. However if the viewer shutdown his brain and watch the movie, he or she will certainly laugh a lot. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Miss Março: A Garota da Capa" ("Miss March: The Girl on the Cover")

I don't know why they didn't add Timmy and other guys to the casting/scripting of this movie, but I'm sure hoping they will if they should ever create another one.

There were some very good laughs, but overall it felt kinda like 90's movie with Tom and Jerry like jokes(Which doesn't have to be a bad thing when well executed).

Also they were going WAY too much for the simple Hollywood recipe and moral story.

Whitest Kids You Know rocks 100% :P I sure can't wait to see new stuff from them.

...maybe my hopes were just too high for this one...

I'd give this a 2 or 3 excepting that is has 5 or 6 absolutely laugh out loud and that's more than most movies. None of this is rocket science: two guys head for the Playboy Mansion to find an ex-girlfriend and have adventures on the way. It's all very silly indeed - but if you imagine you're aged 12 - 14 or are 12 - 14 then this is a not bad guilty pleasure. Awful in places, and in others a huge chuckle fest it really is not anyone's idea of a great movie... but darn, the laugh out loud moments are some of the funniest I've seen all year... and had been laughing when i remembered them afterward....

I will not dignify this film with comments on the plot.. the characters.. the story line for this would be giving it more than it deserves.

Simply put this is one of those movies that you watch because its kind of like a car accident, you know you shouldn't be looking but you can't look away. The acting is so incredibly bad that you actually feel pity and shame for the actors who appear it in it.

It's a bad bad disease, please only watch this film if you watching it for the "it's so bad its good" factor.

Woeful.. awful... absolutely embarrassing for every single person involved. If I served the crew lunch I would want my name left off the credits in fear that this disaster would somehow follow me.

I think that this movie is a perfect example of the weaknesses of IMDb. You get too many people of the wrong mindset reviewing this movie. Being a huge fan of Youtube's "The Whitest Kids U' Know", I found the humour in this movie spot on. It is MEANT to be completely over the top (with some real cringy bits). Its just what they do, and to be honest, not many could do it better.

Yes, this film may not deserve a reputation for anything other than just another Teen movie, but in my books its darn good, and more than anything else, it made me feel a lot happier inside. Is that a bad thing?

Basically, if you are someone who is going to watch this movie without being able to handle sick, crude jokes, then why review it? it isn't for you. That's quite simple.

So in the words of Tucker himself, I would rate this film "A perfect seven".

Whoever went to see this movie and thought: " Hey...it's funny...I really enjoyed this one". Must have been watching Road Trip...because this movie was the stupidest, dumbest and most ridiculous movie I have seen in years. I thought Max Payne was bad...Max Payne was Ben-Hur compared to this movie. The worst acting by both main characters, even worse by the secondary ones(the crazy epileptic gf,crazy firefighter,lesbian Russians,Hugh Hefner,the bouncer with glasses(he should stop doing movies)). I mean will you people stop giving all of these movies 5 stars up here. Fired up was a way better movie than this! And if the directors think we didn't notice a little bit amateur camera work around the motel scenes they are mistaken! Basically this movie sucked! Badly...Meet the Spartans was funnier, Scary Movie 3 was better. Date movie was more appealing than Miss March!

Tucker Cleigh (Trevor Moore) is a loudmouth sex-crazed idiot. Eugene Bell (Zach Cregger) is his straight laced best friend. Cindi Whitehall (Raquel Alessi) is Eugene's girlfriend. They decided to save themselves but Cindi wants to take it to the next level. He promises to have sex on prom night. Then at the prom after party, he falls down a flight of stairs. He wakes up after a 4 year coma when Tucker hit him with a baseball bat. Cindy is the new Playboy centerfold. They take a cross country trip to the Playboy mansion to win her back.

The biggest problem is that the two leads who also co-wrote and co-directed this movie are completely lacking in big screen charisma. It doesn't help that they look like 30 year olds when their characters are in high school. Their age fits a little better after the coma. However the lack of charisma never changes. As for the crude humor, it has its moments. They are definitely pushing the envelope, but everything in between is dreadfully boring.

Critics tended to pan this movie. While I'll admit that the movie tended to lean towards gross and raunchy humor at times (especially the sex scenes, the "flasher" scenes, and the lesbian car driver characters) and that it didn't seem to be fit for all tastes or aiming for being a classic, I still enjoyed the movie and thought it was truly hilarious. What else can you expect from a movie that centers around Playboy magazine? My favorite scenes were with Molly Stanton chasing after the best friend after, during a pole dance scene, he instigated her into having a seizure with strobe lights and tried to pry her off of him by stabbing her in the face with a fork. Her chasing after him and getting the fire department to do the same were, in my opinion, the funniest scenes. I also liked the road trip scenes and Tucker's meeting with Hugh Heffner. You might like this movie. It really depends on your taste and "material threshold." Give it a try if you're in the right mood.

** 1/2 out of ****

Seems that a lot of people really don't like this movie. I don't understand what they wanted out of it or expected but I expected a dumb, raunchy comedy and that's exactly what I got. This movie is no more raunchy than many other teen comedies made around the same time and it actually made me laugh quite a bit. I may be slightly biased because I've been a huge fan of WKUK for a while and really wanted this movie to succeed. I know it's nothing to write home about but if you're in the mood to just laugh at some raunchy comedy then this is a great pick. 7/10.

This movie had potential to be a decent romantic comedy but too many poop jokes just puts it in the "Crass" category.

It was a pathetic attempt to shock the audience with its crudity.

It does have a few moments though. The protagonist Zach, seems to have potential to do better roles.He is the best part of the movie, but unfortunately doe to the poop jokes centered around him, the audience is unable to sympathise with him.

Trevor Moore has also done a decent job of playing the insensitive friend. What is really sad is that the director had come close to pulling off a good movie, but loses the audience due to a few really crass sequences, which were really unnecessary.

There are some humorous moments in this movie, but, not enough to overcome how truly horrible it really is. In between the humorous moments is a stupid movie with very bad acting and scenes that look like they were added just to make the movie longer. I'm pretty sure this movie was written in someone's dorm room while they were failing out of everything. How it became a movie is astonishing, but, I suppose Zach Creggor and Trevor Moore deserve credit for selling it to someone. I wish I had the dollar back it cost me to rent it and the gas it took me to get to the redbox. If you must watch it, I suggest you surf the internet or play a game at the same time to help pass the time.

It's been a long time since I've written an IMDb review but I feel I would be doing movie fans--and humanity--a disservice by not taking a few moments to describe how painful this movie is. It's only slight better than "Son Of The Mask" which I rank as my worst movie of all-time. Believe me...use the 90 minutes to call your grandmother or that old friend you keep putting off because you're "too busy"...or do some exercise...or clean up your garage. ANYTHING but sit on the couch and corrupt your humour glands with this filth.

I am not a prude by any means...I love any kind of smut and filth if it's done properly (i.e. American Pie; There's Something About Mary; etc)...but how this train wreck got produced is beyond me. That anybody in Hollywood in charge of writing the cheques for something like this could read the script and think "yeah, this deserves a budget of $XXXX!!!" makes me fear for the future of moviedom.

In the interest of fairness (what little this piece of trash deserves), I gave it a two instead of a one because I did chuckle--not a genuine LOL, but a guffaw--at least once in the movie and perhaps as many of three times. Certainly not more than that. And the saddest part is, the concept had the capacity to be a decent, poignant, road-trip movie with a decent script and some decent acting. But no, instead we are subjected to a 9-year-old-boy's masturbatory nightmare of degrading and scatological humour.

Avoid at all costs! Or better yet, jot down your own idea for a movie on your cocktail napkin next time you and your buddies are at the bar. No doubt somebody in Hollywood will write a big cheque for it.

Some things you're likely to hear people say after seeing Miss March advertised on television. "Oh, that's Trevor Moore and Zach Creggar! They're from WKUK! I can't wait to see it!" or "Oh, I love WKUK, let's go check that out!" Do you know how I know this? I was one of those people. This is a film that according to many many critics, "If you're a fan of the show, you'll quite probably enjoy this movie." Guess what. The critics were wrong. I find Whitest Kids U' Know hilarious, sketch after sketch, it leaves me amazed. They were in my area and I would have killed to see them perform some sketches live. Trevor, Zach, and the other Whitest Kids are some of my favorite comic performers alive today. Anyway, now onto the film.

Miss March is about a kid who plans to lose his virginity to his girlfriend on prom night. The kid is Eugene Bell, played by Zach Creggar. His best friend, Tucker Cleigh, played by Trevor Moore, tells him he should get drunk first, because it will help him last longer. He gets drunk, going through the wrong door and falling down the basement stairs, knocking down a toolbox and it falls on his head, knocking him out. The next scene opens with him waking from a four year coma, only to find out that his girlfriend is now a Playboy bunny. With the annual Playboy Anniversary Bash right around the corner, the two friends must get to the Playboy mansion so Eugene can get his girlfriend back.

The acting from the main characters, and surprisingly enough, Hugh Hefner himself, was decent. I kind of liked the acting. One of the few things I enjoyed, honestly. The script was awful though. This is the worst writing that I've seen from Trevor and Zach, and I was left disappointed. The jokes were very repetitive and some of the most immature things I've seen from them(although Whitest Kids is a very immature show. Anyone who watches can vouch for this.), and most of the acting was mediocre at best.

Basically, I felt this film was terrible, and even if you do watch Whitest Kids U' Know, enter this film with caution, because this is definitely not a proper representation of the talents of Trevor and Zach, and cameos from the others would have been nice, too, actually. I would have loved to see Timmy, Sam, and the others appear at some point or another.

This isn't a bad movie at all. I love movies like Road Trip, EuroTrip, and Sex Drive. Not sure what the hate is about on this one.

It's so bizarre that it managed to make me laugh out loud, like in the scene where the woman bouncing on the bed falls out the window, it looked like a prank, I laughed until I cried, the rest of the movie is silly and sometimes even boring, full of coconuts scattered around, a dog peeing in the girl's drink... It's interesting to know that the duo of protagonists, directors and screenwriters, who also maintain a TV show (one of them died at 41), are talented, intelligent, funny...

Eugene and Tucker are two great friends who embark on a hilarious trip across the country on their way to the legendary Playboy Mansion to find Cindi, Eugene's stunning girlfriend who went from "virgin to cover girl" while he was in a coma!

The monumentally disgusting Miss March seems to have one key moral to guide it along: ignorance is bliss. Among the most notable examples of Miss March's caveman-like intelligence is that it almost seems like it wants to grab and keep hold of every cliché it can take, but of course, something this reptilian, queasy and nearly reclusive in its anti-comedic not-being-funniness simply doesn't just go for mere clichés--Miss March functions much like a vacuum, too. That is, it makes sure, using plenty of noticeable effort, to suck out all the possible fun and humor of pop culture references, physical gags, et cetera--Miss March is like some dead, strange thing, a type of indecipherable, cancerous lump that started out by meeting my already-low expectations and going only down from there. Miss March is not merely bad, it's sprawling, multi-layered and complex in its boring, plain awfulness, something so fascinatingly stale that it's like a labyrinth of stupidity.

It begins as some casual fluff, children playing inside the cleanest, cutest lil' house in the suburb--but it then downgrades with the two boys finding a Playboy magazine. The directors and writers, with all their uncreative might, seem to pack every endlessly, relentlessly immature joke possible, save for, of course, one, single, solitary, lonely relatively-funny joke (the abstinence assembly sequence even manages to be clever when satirizing all those super-clean sugary abstinence speakers). Of course, Miss March can't merely respond to the lowest common denominator of humor alone--it makes sure to be a leech off previous emotional-ride melodrama tactics used in infinity-plus other comedies that existed before it, not to mention adding all the phony inspiration to the sentimentality that a horde of living, breathing forms of smug, TV-bred culture can live off of for a lifetime. Of course, Miss March doesn't even have the brain or the self-referential fun to even poke fun or at least understand its own ineptitude; all the sappy, happily ever after segments are done without even the slightest bit of irony. It's cringe-inducing. And this may come out as cold and cynical (maybe because I am, maybe because I'm just bothered by this movie's existence), but for the crowd that actually laughs, cries and cheers for this stuff, and there are lots of you, I sure hope you find some joy out of it. Because all I can muster out of it is contempt.

I've been looking forward to seeing this film for a while, as I know the creators from Whitest Kids You Know, which is one of the best and funniest sketch comedies on at the moment, it is seriously brilliant and off the wall but not in an 'attempting to be python again' kind of way coming into miss march was a bit of a downer, its a film thats more commercially acceptable, but really its just another twist on the 'road trip' genre, it has pretty interesting jokes but nothing really new Definitely worth a watch, but road trip, or American pie have done the same thing so much better, but really, check out whitest kids you know, same guys but absolutely brilliant

This is one of those films where less than five minutes in you're asking yourself "how the hell did this movie get made"? It's like watching a five year old trying to be funny, but I understand why adults lie and tell them they're being cute so as not to hurt their feelings. How could the filmmakers be so dense as to not realize that during the production...no one was laughing and the cast and crew were uncomfortable with how bad the material was.

I was actually feeling sorry for the two main guys until I looked the film up and saw that they are the writer/directors. Interesting that they managed to fail at all three jobs they had on this "film".

I very rarely can't tough it through even bad films, but this one is a league all it's own.

How did this movie get made? Why did High Hefner associate himself with this collection of garbage.

This was more a parody of a movie than an actual movie. A collection of targets to offend and very little to redeem it.

Look away! Look away! The gross-out sequences were too gross.

The unrated version had nothing of value and the extras were not worth including.

I fail to see why anybody likes this movie at all.

Bad script, bad acting.

Bad, bad, bad.